IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9479-d878418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternatives to Improve Performance and Operation of a Hybrid Solar Thermal Power Plant Using Hybrid Closed Brayton Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Faustino Moreno-Gamboa

    (Grupo de Investigación FLUTER, Engineering School, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Cucuta 540004, Colombia)

  • Ana Escudero-Atehortua

    (Engineering School, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

  • César Nieto-Londoño

    (Engineering School, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

Abstract

Hybrid solar thermal power plants using the Brayton cycle are currently of great interest as they have proven to be technically feasible. This study evaluates mechanisms to reduce fuel consumption and increase the power generated, improving plant efficiency. An energy and exergy model for the hybrid solar plant is developed using an estimation model for the solar resource to determine the plant operation under specific environmental conditions. The effect of using different working fluids in the Brayton cycle, such as air, and helium in transcritical conditions and carbon dioxide in subcritical and supercritical conditions, is evaluated. Additionally, the plant’s exergy destruction and exergy efficiency are evaluated. In those, it can be highlighted that the helium cycle in the same operating conditions compared to other working fluids can increase the power by 160%, increasing fuel consumption by more than 390%.

Suggested Citation

  • Faustino Moreno-Gamboa & Ana Escudero-Atehortua & César Nieto-Londoño, 2022. "Alternatives to Improve Performance and Operation of a Hybrid Solar Thermal Power Plant Using Hybrid Closed Brayton Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9479-:d:878418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue, Ting & Lior, Noam, 2018. "Thermal hybrid power systems using multiple heat sources of different temperature: Thermodynamic analysis for Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 639-665.
    2. Zhai, H. & Dai, Y.J. & Wu, J.Y. & Wang, R.Z., 2009. "Energy and exergy analyses on a novel hybrid solar heating, cooling and power generation system for remote areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1395-1404, September.
    3. Al-attab, K.A. & Zainal, Z.A., 2015. "Externally fired gas turbine technology: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 474-487.
    4. Yue, Ting & Lior, Noam, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of hybrid Rankine cycles using multiple heat sources of different temperatures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 564-583.
    5. Chen, Lingen & Zhang, Wanli & Sun, Fengrui, 2007. "Power, efficiency, entropy-generation rate and ecological optimization for a class of generalized irreversible universal heat-engine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(5), pages 512-525, May.
    6. Wang, Xurong & Dai, Yiping, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis of utilizing the transcritical CO2 cycle and the ORC for a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle waste heat recovery: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 193-207.
    7. Abram, Tim & Ion, Sue, 2008. "Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4323-4330, December.
    8. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    9. Cocco, Daniele & Deiana, Paolo & Cau, Giorgio, 2006. "Performance evaluation of small size externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) power plants integrated with direct biomass dryers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1459-1471.
    10. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Akbari, Ata D. & Mahmoudi, Seyed M.S., 2014. "Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 501-512.
    12. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    2. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Muñoz, Marta & Rovira, Antonio & Sánchez, Consuelo & Montes, María José, 2017. "Off-design analysis of a Hybrid Rankine-Brayton cycle used as the power block of a solar thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 369-381.
    4. Cao, Yan & Habibi, Hamed & Zoghi, Mohammad & Raise, Amir, 2021. "Waste heat recovery of a combined regenerative gas turbine - recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle driven by a hybrid solar-biomass heat source for multi-generation purpose: 4E analysis and pa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Fan, Gang & Lu, Xiaochen & Chen, Kang & Zhang, Yicen & Han, Zihao & Yu, Haibin & Dai, Yiping, 2022. "Comparative analysis on design and off-design performance of novel cascade CO2 combined cycles for gas turbine waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    6. Fan, Gang & Du, Yang & Li, Hang & Dai, Yiping, 2021. "Off-design behavior investigation of the combined supercritical CO2 and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    7. Tozlu, Alperen & Abuşoğlu, Ayşegül & Özahi, Emrah, 2018. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a Re-compression supercritical CO2 cycle using waste heat of Gaziantep Municipal Solid Waste Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 168-180.
    8. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & He, Ya-Ling & Xu, Jin-Liang, 2019. "A study of new method and comprehensive evaluation on the improved performance of solar power tower plant with the CO2-based mixture cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    9. Penkuhn, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Systematic evaluation of efficiency improvement options for sCO2 Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    11. Kardaś, Dariusz & Polesek-Karczewska, Sylwia & Turzyński, Tomasz & Wardach-Święcicka, Izabela & Hercel, Paulina & Szymborski, Jakub & Heda, Łukasz, 2023. "Thermal performance enhancement of a red-hot air furnace for a micro-scale externally fired gas turbine system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    13. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Marchionni, Matteo & Bianchi, Giuseppe & Tassou, Savvas A., 2018. "Techno-economic assessment of Joule-Brayton cycle architectures for heat to power conversion from high-grade heat sources using CO2 in the supercritical state," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1140-1152.
    16. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    17. David Vera & Francisco Jurado & Bárbara de Mena & Jesús C. Hernández, 2019. "A Distributed Generation Hybrid System for Electric Energy Boosting Fueled with Olive Industry Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Zhang, Yuan & Liang, Tianyang & Yang, Ke, 2022. "An integrated energy storage system consisting of Compressed Carbon dioxide energy storage and Organic Rankine Cycle: Exergoeconomic evaluation and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    19. Wang, Jiangjiang & Lu, Zherui & Li, Meng & Lior, Noam & Li, Weihua, 2019. "Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental (4E) analysis of a distributed generation solar-assisted CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) gas turbine system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1246-1258.
    20. Tong, Yongjing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Ming & Pang, Liping, 2022. "Design optimization of a new supercritical CO2 single reheat coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9479-:d:878418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.