IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v315y2022ics0306261922004548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications

Author

Listed:
  • Eyerer, Sebastian
  • Dawo, Fabian
  • Schifflechner, Christopher
  • Niederdränk, Anne
  • Spliethoff, Hartmut
  • Wieland, Christoph

Abstract

The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) can be applied to generate power from low-temperature heat sources and thus supports a sustainable energy system. This paper contributes to ORC development, particularly for geothermal applications, to increase competitiveness of the technology. To this end, new plant architectures based on regenerative preheating are being investigated. The concept of regenerative preheating is investigated in literature by numerical studies and its thermodynamic and economic performance is predominantly evaluated positively. However, regenerative preheating has not yet been realized in experimental ORC test rigs or commercial products. For this purpose, a novel ORC test rig is designed, constructed and commissioned. For evaluation purposes, the regenerative preheating concept is compared to a standard ORC configuration. As a result, a 9.9% higher net thermal efficiency is achieved with regenerative preheating, while the net power output is equal to the one achieved with the standard configuration. This result is particularly important for combined heat and power (CHP) generation due to the reduced cooling of the heat source. In order to evaluate this concept for CHP applications, a novel ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating is experimentally compared to three state-of-the-art ORC-CHP concepts. Moreover, three different supply and return temperatures of the district heating system (DHS) are considered. The results reveal that the novel architecture, in combination with low- and medium-temperature DHS, leads to an increased part-load performance and a wider operating range. This enables up to 9.4% increase in annual net electricity production, which accounts for additional revenues of 4.56million € in the case of a typical geothermal project. Thus, it can be concluded that this novel ORC-CHP architecture is beneficial from a technical perspective and also promising in terms of economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Niederdränk, Anne & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922004548
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922004548
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wieland, Christoph & Meinel, Dominik & Eyerer, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2016. "Innovative CHP concept for ORC and its benefit compared to conventional concepts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 478-490.
    2. Lorenzo Tocci & Tamas Pal & Ioannis Pesmazoglou & Benjamin Franchetti, 2017. "Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Dawo, Fabian & Fleischmann, Jonas & Kaufmann, Florian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "R1224yd(Z), R1233zd(E) and R1336mzz(Z) as replacements for R245fa: Experimental performance, interaction with lubricants and environmental impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Mohammed Khennich & Nicolas Galanis & Mikhail Sorin, 2013. "Comparison of combined heat and power systems using an organic Rankine cycle and a low-temperature heat source," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(suppl_1), pages 42-46, April.
    5. Mazhar, Abdur Rehman & Liu, Shuli & Shukla, Ashish, 2018. "A state of art review on the district heating systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 420-439.
    6. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Advanced ORC architecture for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    8. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    9. Glen P. Peters & Robbie M. Andrew & Tom Boden & Josep G. Canadell & Philippe Ciais & Corinne Le Quéré & Gregg Marland & Michael R. Raupach & Charlie Wilson, 2013. "The challenge to keep global warming below 2 °C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 4-6, January.
    10. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    12. Lund, Henrik & Werner, Sven & Wiltshire, Robin & Svendsen, Svend & Thorsen, Jan Eric & Hvelplund, Frede & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2014. "4th Generation District Heating (4GDH)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-11.
    13. Aghahosseini, Arman & Breyer, Christian, 2020. "From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    14. Rubio-Maya, C. & Ambríz Díaz, V.M. & Pastor Martínez, E. & Belman-Flores, J.M., 2015. "Cascade utilization of low and medium enthalpy geothermal resources − A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 689-716.
    15. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    16. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D'haeseleer, William, 2017. "Comparison of series/parallel configuration for a low-T geothermal CHP plant, coupled to thermal networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 494-505.
    17. Hawkes, A.D. & Leach, M.A., 2007. "Cost-effective operating strategy for residential micro-combined heat and power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 711-723.
    18. Antonelli, M. & Baccioli, A. & Francesconi, M. & Desideri, U., 2016. "Dynamic modelling of a low-concentration solar power plant: A control strategy to improve flexibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 574-585.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mitterrutzner, Benjamin & Callegher, Claudio Zandonella & Fraboni, Riccardo & Wilczynski, Eric & Pezzutto, Simon, 2023. "Review of heating and cooling technologies for buildings: A techno-economic case study of eleven European countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Schifflechner, Christopher & Kuhnert, Lara & Irrgang, Ludwig & Dawo, Fabian & Kaufmann, Florian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 218-233.
    3. Andrés Meana-Fernández & Juan M. González-Caballín & Roberto Martínez-Pérez & Francisco J. Rubio-Serrano & Antonio J. Gutiérrez-Trashorras, 2022. "Power Plant Cycles: Evolution towards More Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2023. "Exergy efficiency potential of dual-phase expansion trilateral and partial evaporation ORC with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schifflechner, Christopher & Kuhnert, Lara & Irrgang, Ludwig & Dawo, Fabian & Kaufmann, Florian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 218-233.
    2. Schifflechner, Christopher & Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1292-1302.
    3. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Advanced ORC architecture for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    5. Dawo, Fabian & Fleischmann, Jonas & Kaufmann, Florian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "R1224yd(Z), R1233zd(E) and R1336mzz(Z) as replacements for R245fa: Experimental performance, interaction with lubricants and environmental impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    6. Chen, Heng & Wang, Yihan & Li, Jiarui & Xu, Gang & Lei, Jing & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Pili, R. & Eyerer, S. & Dawo, F. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Development of a non-linear state estimator for advanced control of an ORC test rig for geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 676-690.
    8. Witanowski, Łukasz & Klonowicz, Piotr & Lampart, Piotr & Ziółkowski, Paweł, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization of the ORC axial turbine for a waste heat recovery system working in two modes: cogeneration and condensation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    9. Hsieh, Jui-Ching & Chen, Yen-Hsun & Hsieh, Yi-Chi, 2023. "Experimental study of an organic Rankine cycle with a variable-rotational-speed scroll expander at various heat source temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    10. Yuan Zhao & Chenghao Gao & Chengjun Li & Jie Sun & Chunyan Wang & Qiang Liu & Jun Zhao, 2022. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycles Considering the Effect of Brine Reinjection Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Weitzer, Maximilian & Müller, Dominik & Karl, Jürgen, 2022. "Two-phase expansion processes in heat pump – ORC systems (Carnot batteries) with volumetric machines for enhanced off-design efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 720-732.
    12. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    13. Persson, Urban & Wiechers, Eva & Möller, Bernd & Werner, Sven, 2019. "Heat Roadmap Europe: Heat distribution costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 604-622.
    14. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Gao, Datong & Zhao, Bin & Kwan, Trevor Hocksun & Hao, Yong & Pei, Gang, 2022. "The spatial and temporal mismatch phenomenon in solar space heating applications: status and solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    16. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    17. Agnieszka Operacz & Agnieszka Zachora-Buławska & Izabela Strzelecka & Mariusz Buda & Bogusław Bielec & Karolina Migdał & Tomasz Operacz, 2022. "The Standard Geothermal Plant as an Innovative Combined Renewable Energy Resources System: The Case from South Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Ma, Ting & Guo, Zhixiong & Lin, Mei & Wang, Qiuwang, 2021. "Recent trends on nanofluid heat transfer machine learning research applied to renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Sindu Daniarta & Magdalena Nemś & Piotr Kolasiński & Michał Pomorski, 2022. "Sizing the Thermal Energy Storage Device Utilizing Phase Change Material (PCM) for Low-Temperature Organic Rankine Cycle Systems Employing Selected Hydrocarbons," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Kang, Fangchao & Jia, Tianrang & Li, Yingchun & Deng, Jianhui & Tang, Chun'an & Huang, Xin, 2021. "Experimental study on the physical and mechanical variations of hot granite under different cooling treatments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1316-1328.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922004548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.