IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v161y2020icp1292-1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation

Author

Listed:
  • Schifflechner, Christopher
  • Dawo, Fabian
  • Eyerer, Sebastian
  • Wieland, Christoph
  • Spliethoff, Hartmut

Abstract

Petrothermal reservoirs contain a tremendous technical potential without major regional restrictions. The application of supercritical CO2 (sCO2) as a heat carrier might be a promising alternative to the commonly discussed usage of water. This study evaluates both heat carriers for a CHP application. A novel CHP plant layout for a thermosiphon with direct utilization of sCO2 for power generation and a pumped brine system with a parallel CHP plant and power generation by an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) are compared for a defined mass flow rate of 225 kg/s and reservoir conditions of 180 °C and 49 MPa. For the ORC with R245fa the annual amount of net electricity is 3% higher than for the ORC with R1233zd(E) and 8% higher than for the sCO2 case. The net power of the sCO2 plant displays a significantly higher sensitivity to changes of the heat demand compared to the brine-ORC system. While the average exergetic efficiency for the brine concept is 40.9% for R245fa and 40.0% for R1233zd(E), respectively, the sCO2 concept reaches an average efficiency of 72.6%. Finally, two different operation strategies for the sCO2 CHP plant are investigated against the background of potential turbine part-load models.

Suggested Citation

  • Schifflechner, Christopher & Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1292-1302.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:161:y:2020:i:c:p:1292-1302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120311204
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weinand, Jann Michael & McKenna, Russell & Kleinebrahm, Max & Mainzer, Kai, 2019. "Assessing the contribution of simultaneous heat and power generation from geothermal plants in off-grid municipalities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Wieland, Christoph & Meinel, Dominik & Eyerer, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2016. "Innovative CHP concept for ORC and its benefit compared to conventional concepts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 478-490.
    3. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    4. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    5. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2014. "Thermoeconomic Analysis of Hybrid Power Plant Concepts for Geothermal Combined Heat and Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Chamorro, César R. & García-Cuesta, José L. & Mondéjar, María E. & Pérez-Madrazo, Alfonso, 2014. "Enhanced geothermal systems in Europe: An estimation and comparison of the technical and sustainable potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 250-263.
    7. Rajib Uddin Rony & Huojun Yang & Sumathy Krishnan & Jongchul Song, 2019. "Recent Advances in Transcritical CO 2 (R744) Heat Pump System: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-35, January.
    8. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2014. "On the importance of the thermosiphon effect in CPG (CO2 plume geothermal) power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 409-418.
    9. Biagi, James & Agarwal, Ramesh & Zhang, Zheming, 2015. "Simulation and optimization of enhanced geothermal systems using CO2 as a working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 627-637.
    10. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Hast, Aira & Syri, Sanna & Lekavičius, Vidas & Galinis, Arvydas, 2018. "District heating in cities as a part of low-carbon energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 627-639.
    12. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    13. Altun, A.F. & Kilic, M., 2020. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of a geothermal ORC power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 261-274.
    14. Möller, Bernd & Wiechers, Eva & Persson, Urban & Grundahl, Lars & Lund, Rasmus Søgaard & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2019. "Heat Roadmap Europe: Towards EU-Wide, local heat supply strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 554-564.
    15. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Bolatturk, Ali, 2008. "Performance and parametric investigation of a binary geothermal power plant by exergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2366-2374.
    16. Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Zhang, Wei & Lu, Xinli, 2017. "A study on generating a map for selection of optimum power generation cycles used for Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 502-512.
    17. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Schampheleire, S. & De Paepe, M., 2013. "Part load based thermo-economic optimization of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applied to a combined heat and power (CHP) system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 871-881.
    18. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    19. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D'haeseleer, William, 2017. "Comparison of series/parallel configuration for a low-T geothermal CHP plant, coupled to thermal networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 494-505.
    20. Lin, David T.W. & Hsieh, Jui Ching & Shih, Bo Yen, 2019. "The optimization of geothermal extraction based on supercritical CO2 porous heat transfer model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1162-1171.
    21. Wang, Fu & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Jun & Wang, Junyao & Sun, Taiwei & Yan, Jinyue, 2017. "Performance and economic assessments of integrating geothermal energy into coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 278-287.
    22. Tim Eller & Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2019. "Transient Simulation of Geothermal Combined Heat and Power Generation for a Resilient Energetic and Economic Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    23. Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Kalina power plant part load modeling: Comparison of different approaches to model part load behavior and validation on real operating data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 625-637.
    24. Quattrocchi, Fedora & Boschi, Enzo & Spena, Angelo & Buttinelli, Mauro & Cantucci, Barbara & Procesi, Monia, 2013. "Synergic and conflicting issues in planning underground use to produce energy in densely populated countries, as Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 393-412.
    25. Lacirignola, Martino & Blanc, Isabelle, 2013. "Environmental analysis of practical design options for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) through life-cycle assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 901-914.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shakibi, Hamid & Faal, Mehrdad Yousefi & Assareh, Ehsanolah & Agarwal, Neha & Yari, Mortaza & Latifi, Seyed Ali & Ghodrat, Maryam & Lee, Moonyong, 2023. "Design and multi-objective optimization of a multi-generation system based on PEM electrolyzer, RO unit, absorption cooling system, and ORC utilizing machine learning approaches; a case study of Austr," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Mauro Tagliaferri & Paweł Gładysz & Pietro Ungar & Magdalena Strojny & Lorenzo Talluri & Daniele Fiaschi & Giampaolo Manfrida & Trond Andresen & Anna Sowiżdżał, 2022. "Techno-Economic Assessment of the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Guo, Tiankui & Zhang, Yuelong & He, Jiayuan & Gong, Facheng & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2021. "Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in North China oilfield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Guo, Tiankui & Hao, Tong & Chen, Ming & Zhang, Yuelong & Qu, Zhanqing & Jia, Xuliang & Zhang, Wei & Yu, Haiyang, 2023. "Numerical simulation on Geothermal extraction by radial well assisted hydraulic fracturing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 440-450.
    5. R.V., Rohit & R., Vipin Raj & Kiplangat, Dennis C. & R., Veena & Jose, Rajan & Pradeepkumar, A.P. & Kumar, K. Satheesh, 2023. "Tracing the evolution and charting the future of geothermal energy research and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Norouzi, Amir Mohammad & Pouranian, Fatemeh & Rabbani, Arash & Fowler, Neil & Gluyas, Jon & Niasar, Vahid & Ezekiel, Justin & Babaei, Masoud, 2023. "CO2-plume geothermal: Power net generation from 3D fluvial aquifers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Niederdränk, Anne & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    2. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Pili, R. & Eyerer, S. & Dawo, F. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Development of a non-linear state estimator for advanced control of an ORC test rig for geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 676-690.
    5. Chen, Heng & Wang, Yihan & Li, Jiarui & Xu, Gang & Lei, Jing & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Advanced ORC architecture for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Esteves, Ana Filipa & Santos, Francisca Maria & Magalhães Pires, José Carlos, 2019. "Carbon dioxide as geothermal working fluid: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Qiu, Lihua & He, Li & Kang, Yu & Liang, Dongzhe, 2022. "Assessment of the potential of enhanced geothermal systems in Asia under the impact of global warming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 636-646.
    9. Cui, Guodong & Ren, Shaoran & Rui, Zhenhua & Ezekiel, Justin & Zhang, Liang & Wang, Hongsheng, 2018. "The influence of complicated fluid-rock interactions on the geothermal exploitation in the CO2 plume geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 49-63.
    10. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Olasolo, A. & Agius, M.R., 2018. "Analysis of working fluids applicable in Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Nitrous oxide as an alternative working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 150-161.
    11. Romanov, D. & Leiss, B., 2022. "Geothermal energy at different depths for district heating and cooling of existing and future building stock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Schifflechner, Christopher & Kuhnert, Lara & Irrgang, Ludwig & Dawo, Fabian & Kaufmann, Florian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 218-233.
    13. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    14. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    15. Malek, Adam E. & Adams, Benjamin M. & Rossi, Edoardo & Schiegg, Hans O. & Saar, Martin O., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of Advanced Geothermal Systems (AGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 927-943.
    16. Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Pili, Roberto & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "Experimental investigation, model validation and application of twin-screw expanders with different built-in volume ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    17. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    18. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2019. "Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 716-731.
    19. Vaccari, Marco & Pannocchia, Gabriele & Tognotti, Leonardo & Paci, Marco & Bonciani, Roberto, 2020. "A rigorous simulation model of geothermal power plants for emission control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    20. Xia, Z.H. & Jia, G.S. & Ma, Z.D. & Wang, J.W. & Zhang, Y.P. & Jin, L.W., 2021. "Analysis of economy, thermal efficiency and environmental impact of geothermal heating system based on life cycle assessments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:161:y:2020:i:c:p:1292-1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.