IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v65y2014icp250-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced geothermal systems in Europe: An estimation and comparison of the technical and sustainable potentials

Author

Listed:
  • Chamorro, César R.
  • García-Cuesta, José L.
  • Mondéjar, María E.
  • Pérez-Madrazo, Alfonso

Abstract

In this work an estimation and comparison of the technical and sustainable potentials of EGS (Enhanced Geothermal Systems) in Europe is presented. The temperatures at depths of (3500–9500) m were firstly calculated from the available data of temperatures at surface, 1000 m and 2000 m depth, and heat flow. Next the available thermal energy stored in each 1000 m thick layer along the considered depths was evaluated. At this point, the EGS technical potential was estimated and results are presented as installable net electrical power by considering a 30 year time project. A method to estimate the EGS sustainable potential is proposed and the results are compared with the technical potential. Results are presented for the European territory as a whole and individually for each one of the European countries. Estimations for Turkey and the Caucasus region are also presented. Under the hypotheses considered in our study, the technical potential of EGS in Europe for temperatures above 150 °C and depths of between 3 km and 10 km was estimated to be more than 6500 GWe. The part of this technical potential that can be considered as ‘sustainable’ or ‘renewable’ potential was estimated to be 35 GWe.

Suggested Citation

  • Chamorro, César R. & García-Cuesta, José L. & Mondéjar, María E. & Pérez-Madrazo, Alfonso, 2014. "Enhanced geothermal systems in Europe: An estimation and comparison of the technical and sustainable potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 250-263.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:250-263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213010487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chamorro, César R. & Mondéjar, María E. & Ramos, Roberto & Segovia, José J. & Martín, María C. & Villamañán, Miguel A., 2012. "World geothermal power production status: Energy, environmental and economic study of high enthalpy technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 10-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayobami Solomon Oyewo & Javier Farfan & Pasi Peltoniemi & Christian Breyer, 2018. "Repercussion of Large Scale Hydro Dam Deployment: The Case of Congo Grand Inga Hydro Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Leszek Pająk, 2020. "Geological and Thermodynamic Analysis of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation Using ORC and Kalina Cycle Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    4. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2018. "Siting enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): Heat benefits versus induced seismicity risks from an investor and societal perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1311-1325.
    5. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    6. Pattupara, Rajesh & Kannan, Ramachandran, 2016. "Alternative low-carbon electricity pathways in Switzerland and it’s neighbouring countries under a nuclear phase-out scenario," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 152-168.
    7. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & D´Amico, Sebastiano & Liarte, I.A., 2016. "Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 133-144.
    8. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    9. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    10. Wei, Xin & Feng, Zi-jun & Zhao, Yang-sheng, 2019. "Numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling effect in mining fault-mode hot dry rock geothermal energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 120-135.
    11. Zhou, Luming & Zhu, Zhende & Xie, Xinghua & Hu, Yunjin, 2022. "Coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical model for an enhanced geothermal system and numerical analysis of its heat mining performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1440-1458.
    12. Falcone, Gioia & Liu, Xiaolei & Okech, Roy Radido & Seyidov, Ferid & Teodoriu, Catalin, 2018. "Assessment of deep geothermal energy exploitation methods: The need for novel single-well solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 54-63.
    13. Schifflechner, Christopher & Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1292-1302.
    14. Qiu, Lihua & He, Li & Kang, Yu & Liang, Dongzhe, 2022. "Assessment of the potential of enhanced geothermal systems in Asia under the impact of global warming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 636-646.
    15. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Olasolo, A. & Agius, M.R., 2018. "Analysis of working fluids applicable in Enhanced Geothermal Systems: Nitrous oxide as an alternative working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 150-161.
    16. Wang, Guoying & Ma, Hongwei & Liu, Shaowei & Yang, Dong & Xu, Xiaokai & Fu, Mengxiong & Jia, Housheng, 2022. "Thermal power extraction from a deep, closed-loop, multi-level, multi-branch, U-shaped borehole heat exchanger geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 894-906.
    17. Aghahosseini, Arman & Breyer, Christian, 2020. "From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    18. Child, Michael & Breyer, Christian, 2016. "Vision and initial feasibility analysis of a recarbonised Finnish energy system for 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 517-536.
    19. Buonocore, Elvira & Vanoli, Laura & Carotenuto, Alberto & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2015. "Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 476-487.
    20. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    21. Ellen Nordgård-Hansen & Ingvild Firman Fjellså & Tamás Medgyes & María Guðmundsdóttir & Baldur Pétursson & Maciej Miecznik & Leszek Pająk & Oto Halás & Einar Leknes & Kirsti Midttømme, 2023. "Differences in Direct Geothermal Energy Utilization for Heating and Cooling in Central and Northern European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-30, September.
    22. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Stauffacher, Michael, 2019. "Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss-German cross-national study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 807-816.
    23. Arman Aghahosseini & Dmitrii Bogdanov & Christian Breyer, 2017. "A Techno-Economic Study of an Entirely Renewable Energy-Based Power Supply for North America for 2030 Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-28, August.
    24. Guo, Tiankui & Tang, Songjun & Sun, Jiang & Gong, Facheng & Liu, Xiaoqiang & Qu, Zhanqing & Zhang, Wei, 2020. "A coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical modeling and evaluation of geothermal extraction in the enhanced geothermal system based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Haris, Muhammad & Hou, Michael Z. & Feng, Wentao & Mehmood, Faisal & Saleem, Ammar bin, 2022. "A regenerative Enhanced Geothermal System for heat and electricity production as well as energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 342-358.
    3. Pietrasanta, Ariana M. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Aguirre, Pio A. & Morosuk, Tatiana & Mussati, Miguel C., 2022. "Water-renewable energy Nexus: Optimization of geothermal energy-powered seawater desalination systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 234-246.
    4. Trumpy, Eugenio & Bertani, Ruggero & Manzella, Adele & Sander, Marietta, 2015. "The web-oriented framework of the world geothermal production database: A business intelligence platform for wide data distribution and analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 379-389.
    5. Veldhuis, A.J. & Reinders, A.H.M.E., 2013. "Reviewing the potential and cost-effectiveness of grid-connected solar PV in Indonesia on a provincial level," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 315-324.
    6. Gude, Veera Gnaneswar, 2016. "Geothermal source potential for water desalination – Current status and future perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1038-1065.
    7. Ilyas Khurshid & Imran Afgan, 2021. "Investigation of Water Composition on Formation Damage and Related Energy Recovery from Geothermal Reservoirs: Geochemical and Geomechanics Insights," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2017. "Geothermal energy in Turkey and around the World: A review of the literature and an analysis based on Turkey's Vision 2023 energy targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 485-492.
    9. Xu, Tianfu & Yuan, Yilong & Jia, Xiaofeng & Lei, Yude & Li, Shengtao & Feng, Bo & Hou, Zhaoyun & Jiang, Zhenjiao, 2018. "Prospects of power generation from an enhanced geothermal system by water circulation through two horizontal wells: A case study in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 196-207.
    10. Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Singh, Mrityunjay & Turan, Aysegul & Bär, Kristian & Sass, Ingo, 2022. "Simulations and global sensitivity analysis of the thermo-hydraulic-mechanical processes in a fractured geothermal reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    11. Abbas, Tauqeer & Ahmed Bazmi, Aqeel & Waheed Bhutto, Abdul & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2014. "Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan-geothermal energy prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 258-269.
    12. Wei, Xin & Feng, Zi-jun & Zhao, Yang-sheng, 2019. "Numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling effect in mining fault-mode hot dry rock geothermal energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 120-135.
    13. Muhammad Haris & Michael Z. Hou & Wentao Feng & Jiashun Luo & Muhammad Khurram Zahoor & Jianxing Liao, 2020. "Investigative Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Modelling Approach for Geothermal Heat Extraction through Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing from Hot Geothermal Sedimentary Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Zhang, Yan-Jun & Li, Zheng-Wei & Guo, Liang-Liang & Gao, Ping & Jin, Xian-Peng & Xu, Tian-Fu, 2014. "Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: A case study in Xujiaw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 788-805.
    15. Osman Özkaraca & Pınar Keçebaş & Cihan Demircan & Ali Keçebaş, 2017. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Geothermal- Based Organic Rankine Cycle System Using an Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    16. Sahraei, Mohammad Hossein & Farhadi, Fatola & Boozarjomehry, Ramin Bozorgmehry, 2013. "Analysis and interaction of exergy, environmental and economic in multi-objective optimization of BTX process based on evolutionary algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 147-156.
    17. Wang, Yang & Li, Tuo & Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei, 2019. "Numerical analysis of heat mining and geological carbon sequestration in supercritical CO2 circulating enhanced geothermal systems inlayed with complex discrete fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 92-108.
    18. Kazemiani-Najafabadi, Parisa & Amiri Rad, Ehsan, 2020. "Optimization of an improved power cycle for geothermal applications in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    19. Zeng, Yu-Chao & Su, Zheng & Wu, Neng-You, 2013. "Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 92-107.
    20. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:65:y:2014:i:c:p:250-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.