IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2121-d533603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Criteria for Optimal Site Selection for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Plants in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito Exterior s/n, Coyoacán, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Rodolfo Silva

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito Exterior s/n, Coyoacán, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Yandy Rodríguez-Cueto

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito Exterior s/n, Coyoacán, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Alejandro García-Huante

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Ciudad Universitaria, Circuito Exterior s/n, Coyoacán, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Jorge Olmedo-González

    (ESIQIE, Laboratorio Electroquímica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Avenida Instituto Politécnico Nacional s/n, Nueva Industrial Vallejo, 07738 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • M. Luisa Martínez

    (Functional Ecology Network, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Xalapa, 91073 Veracruz, Mexico)

  • Astrid Wojtarowski

    (El Colegio de Veracruz, Xalapa, 91000 Veracruz, Mexico)

  • Raúl Martell-Dubois

    (Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Tlalpan, 14010 Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Sergio Cerdeira-Estrada

    (Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Tlalpan, 14010 Mexico City, Mexico)

Abstract

Sustainable energy is needed globally, and Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) is a possible way to diversify the energy matrix. This article suggests a preliminary selection process to find optimal sites for OTEC deployment on the Mexican coastline. The method comprises the (1) evaluation of the thermal power potential, using daily data (16 years) of sea surface temperature, and the percentage of available time of the power thresholds; (2) assessment of feasibility using a decision matrix, fed by technical, environmental and socioeconomic criteria; (3) identification of four potential sites; and (4) comparison of OTEC competitiveness with other technologies through the levelized cost of energy. Multi-criteria decision analysis was applied to select optimal sites, using the technique for ordering performance by the similarity to the ideal solution. The best sites were (1) Puerto Angel and (2) Cabo San Lucas; with power production of > 50 MW and a persistence of > 40%. As yet there is no evidence from operational OTEC plants that could alter the environmental and socioeconomic criteria weightings. More in situ studies on pilot plants should help to determine their possible environmental impact and socio-economic consequences before any larger-scale projects are implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz & Rodolfo Silva & Yandy Rodríguez-Cueto & Alejandro García-Huante & Jorge Olmedo-González & M. Luisa Martínez & Astrid Wojtarowski & Raúl Martell-Dubois & Sergio Cerdeira-Estr, 2021. "Criteria for Optimal Site Selection for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) Plants in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2121-:d:533603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernardoni, C. & Binotti, M. & Giostri, A., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of closed OTEC cycles for power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1018-1033.
    2. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    3. Juan Francisco Barcenas Graniel & Enrique Celestino Carrera Chan & Maria Fernanda Sabido Tun & Estela Cerezo-Acevedo, 2020. "Environmental Impact Assessment of the Operation of an Open Cycle OTEC 1MWe Power Plant in the Cozumel Island, Mexico," Chapters, in: Albert S. Kim & Hyeon-Ju Kim (ed.), Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) - Past, Present, and Progress, IntechOpen.
    4. Mendoza, Edgar & Lithgow, Debora & Flores, Pamela & Felix, Angélica & Simas, Teresa & Silva, Rodolfo, 2019. "A framework to evaluate the environmental impact of OCEAN energy devices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 440-449.
    5. Osorio, Andrés F. & Arias-Gaviria, Jessica & Devis-Morales, Andrea & Acevedo, Diego & Velasquez, Héctor Iván & Arango-Aramburo, Santiago, 2016. "Beyond electricity: The potential of ocean thermal energy and ocean technology ecoparks in small tropical islands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 713-724.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Langer, Jannis & Infante Ferreira, Carlos & Quist, Jaco, 2022. "Is bigger always better? Designing economically feasible ocean thermal energy conversion systems using spatiotemporal resource data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Albert S. Kim, 2022. "Special Issue “Selected Papers from the 8th International OTEC Symposium”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-2, January.
    3. Enas Taha Sayed & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Abdul Hai Alami & Ali Radwan & Ayman Mdallal & Ahmed Rezk & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Hall, Kashawn & Kelly, Solange & Henry, Legena, 2022. "Site selection of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) plants for Barbados," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 60-69.
    5. Guillermo Lopez & Maria de los Angeles Ortega Del Rosario & Arthur James & Humberto Alvarez, 2022. "Site Selection for Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Plants (OTEC): A Case Study in Panama," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Jessica Guadalupe Tobal-Cupul & Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz & Emiliano Gorr-Pozzi & Jorge Olmedo-González & Emily Diane Martínez & Andrés Rosales & Dulce Daniela Navarro-Moreno & Jonathan Emmanuel Beníte, 2022. "An Assessment of the Financial Feasibility of an OTEC Ecopark: A Case Study at Cozumel Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    7. Eglė Tumelienė & Jūratė Sužiedelytė Visockienė & Vida Maliene, 2022. "Evaluating the Eligibility of Abandoned Agricultural Land for the Development of Wind Energy in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica Guadalupe Tobal-Cupul & Erika Paola Garduño-Ruiz & Emiliano Gorr-Pozzi & Jorge Olmedo-González & Emily Diane Martínez & Andrés Rosales & Dulce Daniela Navarro-Moreno & Jonathan Emmanuel Beníte, 2022. "An Assessment of the Financial Feasibility of an OTEC Ecopark: A Case Study at Cozumel Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Langer, Jannis & Quist, Jaco & Blok, Kornelis, 2020. "Recent progress in the economics of ocean thermal energy conversion: Critical review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Langer, Jannis & Quist, Jaco & Blok, Kornelis, 2022. "Upscaling scenarios for ocean thermal energy conversion with technological learning in Indonesia and their global relevance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    5. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    6. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Xinxin Liu & Xiaosheng Wang & Haiying Guo & Xiaojie An, 2021. "Benefit Allocation in Shared Water-Saving Management Contract Projects Based on Modified Expected Shapley Value," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 39-62, January.
    8. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    9. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.
    10. D. K. Choudhury, 2019. "Standard Critical Path and Selection of Most Economic and Quality Contractors for Construction of Thermal Power Plant: A Case Study in NTPC," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 18(2), pages 103-118, December.
    11. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    12. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    13. Levary, Reuven R. & Wan, Ke, 1999. "An analytic hierarchy process based simulation model for entry mode decision regarding foreign direct investment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 661-677, December.
    14. Lilian. O. Iheukwumere-Esotu & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo, 2021. "Knowledge Criticality Assessment and Codification Framework for Major Maintenance Activities: A Case Study of Cement Rotary Kiln Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Wang, Guohui & Yang, Yanan & Wang, Shuxin & Zhang, Hongwei & Wang, Yanhui, 2019. "Efficiency analysis and experimental validation of the ocean thermal energy conversion with phase change material for underwater vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 475-488.
    16. Alpana Agarwal & Divina Raghav, 2023. "Analysing Determinants of Employee Performance Based on Reverse Mentoring and Employer Branding Using Analytic Hierarchical Process," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 48(3), pages 343-358, August.
    17. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    19. Mou, W.M. & Wong, W.-K. & McAleer, M.J., 2018. "Financial Credit Risk and Core Enterprise Supply Chains," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-27, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    20. Marco Rogna, 2019. "A First-Phase Screening Device for Site Selection of Large-Scale Solar Plants with an Application to Italy," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS57, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2121-:d:533603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.