IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i5p1418-d510666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Energy Consumption and Drivability Performance of an IPMSM-Driven Electric Vehicle Using Different Buried Magnet Arrangements

Author

Listed:
  • Pedram Asef

    (Department of Engineering and Technology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK)

  • Ramon Bargallo

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08019 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Andrew Lapthorn

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch CT1 1QU, New Zealand)

  • Davide Tavernini

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Lingyun Shao

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Aldo Sorniotti

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of the buried magnet arrangement on the efficiency and drivability performance provided by an on-board interior permanent magnet synchronous machine for a four-wheel-drive electric car with two single-speed on-board powertrains. The relevant motor characteristics, including flux-linkage, inductance, electromagnetic torque, iron loss, total loss, and efficiency, are analyzed for a set of six permanent magnet configurations suitable for the specific machine, which is controlled through maximum-torque-per-ampere and maximum-torque-per-voltage strategies. Moreover, the impact of each magnet arrangement is analyzed in connection with the energy consumption along four driving cycles, as well as the longitudinal acceleration and gradeability performance of the considered vehicle. The simulation results identify the most promising rotor solutions, and show that: (i) the appropriate selection of the rotor configuration is especially important for the driving cycles with substantial high-speed sections; (ii) the magnet arrangement has a major impact on the maximum motor torque below the base speed, and thus on the longitudinal acceleration and gradeability performance; and (iii) the configurations that excel in energy efficiency are among the worst in terms of drivability, and vice versa, i.e., at the vehicle level, the rotor arrangement selection is a trade-off between energy efficiency and longitudinal vehicle dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedram Asef & Ramon Bargallo & Andrew Lapthorn & Davide Tavernini & Lingyun Shao & Aldo Sorniotti, 2021. "Assessment of the Energy Consumption and Drivability Performance of an IPMSM-Driven Electric Vehicle Using Different Buried Magnet Arrangements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1418-:d:510666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1418/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1418/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoyu Liu & Qifang Lin & Weinong Fu, 2017. "Optimal Design of Permanent Magnet Arrangement in Synchronous Motors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Grzegorz Sieklucki, 2021. "Optimization of Powertrain in EV," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Stefano De Pinto & Pablo Camocardi & Christoforos Chatzikomis & Aldo Sorniotti & Francesco Bottiglione & Giacomo Mantriota & Pietro Perlo, 2020. "On the Comparison of 2- and 4-Wheel-Drive Electric Vehicle Layouts with Central Motors and Single- and 2-Speed Transmission Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Jianxia Sun & Cheng Lin & Jilei Xing & Xiongwei Jiang, 2019. "Online MTPA Trajectory Tracking of IPMSM Based on a Novel Torque Control Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Thanh Anh Huynh & Min-Fu Hsieh, 2018. "Performance Analysis of Permanent Magnet Motors for Electric Vehicles (EV) Traction Considering Driving Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michal Gierczynski & Lech M. Grzesiak, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of the Steady-State Model Including Non-Linear Flux Linkage Surfaces and the Simplified Linearized Model when Applied to a Highly-Saturated Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine—Ev," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Andrea Di Martino & Seyed Mahdi Miraftabzadeh & Michela Longo, 2022. "Strategies for the Modelisation of Electric Vehicle Energy Consumption: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Yuhua Sun & Nicola Bianchi & Jinghua Ji & Wenxiang Zhao, 2023. "Improving Torque Analysis and Design Using the Air-Gap Field Modulation Principle for Permanent-Magnet Hub Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Jastrzębski & Jacek Kabziński, 2021. "Approximation of Permanent Magnet Motor Flux Distribution by Partially Informed Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Dimitrios Rimpas & Stavrοs D. Kaminaris & Dimitrios D. Piromalis & George Vokas & Konstantinos G. Arvanitis & Christos-Spyridon Karavas, 2023. "Comparative Review of Motor Technologies for Electric Vehicles Powered by a Hybrid Energy Storage System Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Klemen Drobnič & Lovrenc Gašparin & Rastko Fišer, 2019. "Fast and Accurate Model of Interior Permanent-Magnet Machine for Dynamic Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Pavol Rafajdus & Valeria Hrabovcova & Pavel Lehocky & Pavol Makys & Filip Holub, 2018. "Effect of Saturation on Field Oriented Control of the New Designed Reluctance Synchronous Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-10, November.
    5. Grzegorz Sieklucki & Dawid Kara, 2022. "Design and Modelling of Energy Conversion with the Two-Region Torque Control of a PMSM in an EV Powertrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Ting Yang & Takahiro Kawaguchi & Seiji Hashimoto & Wei Jiang, 2020. "Switching Sequence Model Predictive Direct Torque Control of IPMSMs for EVs in Switch Open-Circuit Fault-Tolerant Mode," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Adrian Mlot & Juan González, 2020. "Performance Assessment of Axial-Flux Permanent Magnet Motors from a Manual Manufacturing Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Armagan Bozkurt & Ahmet Fevzi Baba & Yusuf Oner, 2021. "Design of Outer-Rotor Permanent-Magnet-Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor for Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Anton Dianov & Alecksey Anuchin, 2021. "Design of Constraints for Seeking Maximum Torque per Ampere Techniques in an Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Hyunjae Lee & Gunbok Lee & Gildong Kim & Jingeun Shon, 2022. "Variable Incremental Controller of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor for Voltage-Based Flux-Weakening Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Edison Gundabattini & Arkadiusz Mystkowski & Adam Idzkowski & Raja Singh R. & Darius Gnanaraj Solomon, 2021. "Thermal Mapping of a High-Speed Electric Motor Used for Traction Applications and Analysis of Various Cooling Methods—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-32, March.
    12. Chao Wu & Jun Yang & Qi Li, 2020. "GPIO-Based Nonlinear Predictive Control for Flux-Weakening Current Control of the IPMSM Servo System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Jinshun Hao & Shuangfu Suo & Yiyong Yang & Yang Wang & Wenjie Wang, 2019. "Power Density Analysis and Optimization of SMPMSM Based on FEM, DE Algorithm and Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-9, September.
    14. Artur Piščalov & Edgaras Urbonas & Darius Vainorius & Jonas Matijošius & Artūras Kilikevičius, 2021. "Investigation of X and Y Configuration Modal and Dynamic Response to Velocity Excitation of the Nanometer Resolution Linear Servo Motor Stage with Quasi-Industrial Guiding System in Quasi-Stable State," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Wei Chen & Jiaojiao Liang & Tingna Shi, 2018. "Speed Synchronous Control of Multiple Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on an Improved Cross-Coupling Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Mitsuhide Sato & Keigo Takazawa & Manabu Horiuchi & Ryoken Masuda & Ryo Yoshida & Masami Nirei & Yinggang Bu & Tsutomu Mizuno, 2020. "Reducing Rotor Temperature Rise in Concentrated Winding Motor by Using Magnetic Powder Mixed Resin Ring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Zeyang Fan & Hong Yi & Jian Xu & Kun Xie & Yue Qi & Sailin Ren & Hongdong Wang, 2021. "Performance Study and Optimization Design of High-Speed Amorphous Alloy Induction Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Anton Dianov & Alecksey Anuchin, 2020. "Adaptive Maximum Torque per Ampere Control of Sensorless Permanent Magnet Motor Drives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Huimin Li & Shoudao Huang & Derong Luo & Jian Gao & Peng Fan, 2018. "Dynamic DC-link Voltage Adjustment for Electric Vehicles Considering the Cross Saturation Effects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Massimo Caruso & Antonino Oscar Di Tommaso & Giuseppe Lisciandrello & Rosa Anna Mastromauro & Rosario Miceli & Claudio Nevoloso & Ciro Spataro & Marco Trapanese, 2020. "A General and Accurate Measurement Procedure for the Detection of Power Losses Variations in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1418-:d:510666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.