IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p1134-d503039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Stochastic Petri Net Model for O&M Planning of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Tobi Elusakin

    (Department of Energy and Power, Cranfield University, College Road, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Mahmood Shafiee

    (Mechanical Engineering Group, School of Engineering, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NT, UK)

  • Tosin Adedipe

    (Department of Energy and Power, Cranfield University, College Road, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Fateme Dinmohammadi

    (The Bartlett Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), University College London (UCL), Gower Street, London WC1E 6BTL, UK)

Abstract

With increasing deployment of offshore wind farms further from shore and in deeper waters, the efficient and effective planning of operation and maintenance (O&M) activities has received considerable attention from wind energy developers and operators in recent years. The O&M planning of offshore wind farms is a complicated task, as it depends on many factors such as asset degradation rates, availability of resources required to perform maintenance tasks (e.g., transport vessels, service crew, spare parts, and special tools) as well as the uncertainties associated with weather and climate variability. A brief review of the literature shows that a lot of research has been conducted on optimizing the O&M schedules for fixed-bottom offshore wind turbines; however, the literature for O&M planning of floating wind farms is too limited. This paper presents a stochastic Petri network (SPN) model for O&M planning of floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) and their support structure components, including floating platform, moorings and anchoring system. The proposed model incorporates all interrelationships between different factors influencing O&M planning of FOWTs, including deterioration and renewal process of components within the system. Relevant data such as failure rate, mean-time-to-failure (MTTF), degradation rate, etc. are collected from the literature as well as wind energy industry databases, and then the model is tested on an NREL 5 MW reference wind turbine system mounted on an OC3-Hywind spar buoy floating platform. The results indicate that our proposed model can significantly contribute to the reduction of O&M costs in the floating offshore wind sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobi Elusakin & Mahmood Shafiee & Tosin Adedipe & Fateme Dinmohammadi, 2021. "A Stochastic Petri Net Model for O&M Planning of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1134-:d:503039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Jianlan & Zhang, Xuran & Zhou, Xing & Lu, Luyi, 2019. "Reliability assessment of wind turbine bearing based on the degradation-Hidden-Markov model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1076-1087.
    2. Shafiee, Mahmood & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: Models, methods and strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Xiyun Yang & Jinxia Li & Wei Liu & Peng Guo, 2011. "Petri Net Model and Reliability Evaluation for Wind Turbine Hydraulic Variable Pitch Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Koh, J.H. & Ng, E.Y.K., 2016. "Downwind offshore wind turbines: Opportunities, trends and technical challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 797-808.
    6. Kusiak, Andrew & Verma, Anoop, 2012. "Analyzing bearing faults in wind turbines: A data-mining approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 110-116.
    7. Shafiee, Mahmood, 2015. "Maintenance logistics organization for offshore wind energy: Current progress and future perspectives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-193.
    8. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim, 2015. "An optimal age-based group maintenance policy for multi-unit degrading systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 230-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J., 2022. "Operation and maintenance for floating wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Arthur Henrique de Andrade Melani & Miguel Angelo de Carvalho Michalski & Carlos Alberto Murad & Adherbal Caminada Netto & Gilberto Francisco Martha de Souza, 2022. "Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets for Planning and Optimizing Maintenance Logistics of Small Hydroelectric Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shafiee, Mahmood & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "Maintenance optimization and inspection planning of wind energy assets: Models, methods and strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. McMorland, Jade & Flannigan, Callum & Carroll, James & Collu, Maurizio & McMillan, David & Leithead, William & Coraddu, Andrea, 2022. "A review of operations and maintenance modelling with considerations for novel wind turbine concepts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. Adedipe, Tosin & Shafiee, Mahmood & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "Bayesian Network Modelling for the Wind Energy Industry: An Overview," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 463-471.
    6. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    7. Annalisa Santolamazza & Daniele Dadi & Vito Introna, 2021. "A Data-Mining Approach for Wind Turbine Fault Detection Based on SCADA Data Analysis Using Artificial Neural Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Thomas Michael Welte & Iver Bakken Sperstad & Espen Høegh Sørum & Magne Lorentzen Kolstad, 2017. "Integration of Degradation Processes in a Strategic Offshore Wind Farm O&M Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Cristian Velandia-Cardenas & Yolanda Vidal & Francesc Pozo, 2021. "Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using Highly Imbalanced Real SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Pliego Marugán, Alberto & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Pinar Pérez, Jesús María, 2022. "A techno-economic model for avoiding conflicts of interest between owners of offshore wind farms and maintenance suppliers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2023. "A closed-loop maintenance strategy for offshore wind farms: Incorporating dynamic wind farm states and uncertainty-awareness in decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    12. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S. & Scarf, Philip A., 2021. "Inspection and replacement policy with a fixed periodic schedule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Fan, Lin & Su, Huai & Wang, Wei & Zio, Enrico & Zhang, Li & Yang, Zhaoming & Peng, Shiliang & Yu, Weichao & Zuo, Lili & Zhang, Jinjun, 2022. "A systematic method for the optimization of gas supply reliability in natural gas pipeline network based on Bayesian networks and deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    14. Yuri Merizalde & Luis Hernández-Callejo & Oscar Duque-Perez & Víctor Alonso-Gómez, 2019. "Maintenance Models Applied to Wind Turbines. A Comprehensive Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-41, January.
    15. Ruiz Muñoz, G.A. & Sørensen, J.D., 2020. "Probabilistic inspection planning of offshore welds subject to the transition from protected to corrosive environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    17. Yancai Xiao & Ruolan Dai & Guangjian Zhang & Weijia Chen, 2017. "The Use of an Improved LSSVM and Joint Normalization on Temperature Prediction of Gearbox Output Shaft in DFWT," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Abdollahzadeh, Hadi & Atashgar, Karim & Abbasi, Morteza, 2016. "Multi-objective opportunistic maintenance optimization of a wind farm considering limited number of maintenance groups," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 247-261.
    19. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Peng Sun & Jian Li & Junsheng Chen & Xiao Lei, 2016. "A Short-Term Outage Model of Wind Turbines with Doubly Fed Induction Generators Based on Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1134-:d:503039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.