IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v285y2023ics0360544223027688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computationally efficient analytical O&M model for strategic decision-making in offshore renewable energy systems

Author

Listed:
  • Centeno-Telleria, Manu
  • Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio
  • Penalba, Markel

Abstract

To boost the deployment of all offshore renewable energy technologies, it is fundamental to adopt convenient long-term strategic operation and maintenance (O&M) decisions. Due to the lack of experience and reliable information, performing extensive sensitivity analysis is a key factor for supporting strategic O&M decision-making. By evaluating various scenarios, sensitivity analyses provide valuable insights to identify critical factors and enhance decision confidence. To that end, the development of computationally efficient O&M models, where accessibility, availability, energy, and economic aspects are adequately articulated is crucial. Simulation-based O&M models, i.e. based on Monte Carlo methods, have been widely used to incorporate those fours aspects. However, the computational burden of simulation-based O&M models is prohibitive, limiting the feasibility of conducting extensive sensitivity analyses. In view of this, this study presents a computationally efficient analytical O&M model based on Markov Chains. This analytical O&M model is compared with two case studies presented in the literature, where simulation-based O&M models are employed, studying a floating offshore wind and a wave energy farm. Results demonstrate that the analytical O&M model achieves the same level of fidelity as simulation-based models (within 10% deviation), while reducing the computational burden by at least five orders of magnitude.

Suggested Citation

  • Centeno-Telleria, Manu & Aizpurua, Jose Ignacio & Penalba, Markel, 2023. "Computationally efficient analytical O&M model for strategic decision-making in offshore renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223027688
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223027688
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vazquez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "LCOE (levelised cost of energy) mapping: A new geospatial tool for tidal stream energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 192-201.
    2. Rinaldi, Giovanni & Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Jeffrey, Henry & Thies, Philipp R. & Johanning, Lars, 2021. "Incorporating stochastic operation and maintenance models into the techno-economic analysis of floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    4. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1121-1130.
    5. Vazquez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2016. "Capital costs in tidal stream energy projects – A spatial approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 215-226.
    6. McMorland, Jade & Flannigan, Callum & Carroll, James & Collu, Maurizio & McMillan, David & Leithead, William & Coraddu, Andrea, 2022. "A review of operations and maintenance modelling with considerations for novel wind turbine concepts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Tobi Elusakin & Mahmood Shafiee & Tosin Adedipe & Fateme Dinmohammadi, 2021. "A Stochastic Petri Net Model for O&M Planning of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Kang, Jichuan & Sun, Liping & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Fault Tree Analysis of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1455-1467.
    9. Gutierrez-Alcoba, A. & Hendrix, E.M.T. & Ortega, G. & Halvorsen-Weare, E.E. & Haugland, D., 2019. "On offshore wind farm maintenance scheduling for decision support on vessel fleet composition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 124-131.
    10. Shafiee, Mahmood, 2015. "Maintenance logistics organization for offshore wind energy: Current progress and future perspectives," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-193.
    11. Castro-Santos, Laura & Filgueira-Vizoso, Almudena & Carral-Couce, Luis & Formoso, José Ángel Fraguela, 2016. "Economic feasibility of floating offshore wind farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 868-882.
    12. Laura, Castro-Santos & Vicente, Diaz-Casas, 2014. "Life-cycle cost analysis of floating offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 41-48.
    13. Taylor, James W. & Jeon, Jooyoung, 2018. "Probabilistic forecasting of wave height for offshore wind turbine maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 877-890.
    14. Nguyen, Thi-Anh-Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Developing an exhaustive optimal maintenance schedule for offshore wind turbines based on risk-assessment, technical factors and cost-effective evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    15. Teillant, Boris & Costello, Ronan & Weber, Jochem & Ringwood, John, 2012. "Productivity and economic assessment of wave energy projects through operational simulations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 220-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Zhengru & Verma, Amrit Shankar & Li, Ye & Teuwen, Julie J.E. & Jiang, Zhiyu, 2021. "Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    3. Ghigo, Alberto & Faraggiana, Emilio & Giorgi, Giuseppe & Mattiazzo, Giuliana & Bracco, Giovanni, 2024. "Floating Vertical Axis Wind Turbines for offshore applications among potentialities and challenges: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "Economic-financial modeling for marine current harnessing projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 859-880.
    5. Cheng Yang & Jun Jia & Ke He & Liang Xue & Chao Jiang & Shuangyu Liu & Bochao Zhao & Ming Wu & Haoyang Cui, 2023. "Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Power Systems: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-39, July.
    6. Laura Castro-Santos & Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso, 2019. "A Software for Calculating the Economic Aspects of Floating Offshore Renewable Energies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J., 2022. "Operation and maintenance for floating wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Hailun Xie & Lars Johanning, 2023. "A Hierarchical Met-Ocean Data Selection Model for Fast O&M Simulation in Offshore Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Lande-Sudall, D. & Stallard, T. & Stansby, P., 2019. "Co-located deployment of offshore wind turbines with tidal stream turbine arrays for improved cost of electricity generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 492-503.
    10. Gilbert, Ciaran & Browell, Jethro & McMillan, David, 2021. "Probabilistic access forecasting for improved offshore operations," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 134-150.
    11. Jahanshahi, Akram & Kamali, Mohammadreza & Khalaj, Mohammadreza & Khodaparast, Zahra, 2019. "Delphi-based prioritization of economic criteria for development of wave and tidal energy technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 819-827.
    12. Yang, Zhixue & Ren, Zhouyang & Li, Zhenwen & Xu, Yan & Li, Hui & Li, Wenyuan & Hu, Xiuqiong, 2022. "A comprehensive analysis method for levelized cost of energy in tidal current power generation farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 982-991.
    13. Yang Lu & Liping Sun & Yanzhuo Xue, 2021. "Research on a Comprehensive Maintenance Optimization Strategy for an Offshore Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Martinez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2022. "Mapping of the levelised cost of energy for floating offshore wind in the European Atlantic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Stålhane, Magnus & Halvorsen-Weare, Elin E. & Nonås, Lars Magne & Pantuso, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimizing vessel fleet size and mix to support maintenance operations at offshore wind farms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 495-509.
    16. Shamsan Alsubal & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Eu Lim Shawn & M. S. Liew & Pavitirakumar Palaniappan & Muhammad Ali Musarat, 2021. "Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Offshore Wind Farm: Kudat Malaysia Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Fouz, D.M. & Carballo, R. & López, I. & González, X.P. & Iglesias, G., 2023. "A methodology for cost-effective analysis of hydrokinetic energy projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    19. Shuo-Yan Chou & Xuan Loc Pham & Thi Anh Tuyet Nguyen & Tiffany Hui-Kuang Yu, 2023. "Optimal maintenance planning with special emphasis on deterioration process and vessel routing for offshore wind systems," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(4), pages 739-763, June.
    20. Sarker, Bhaba R. & Faiz, Tasnim Ibn, 2016. "Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 104-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223027688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.