IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1471-d1055372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hierarchical Met-Ocean Data Selection Model for Fast O&M Simulation in Offshore Renewable Energy Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hailun Xie

    (Renewable Energy Group, Faculty of Environment, Science, and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK)

  • Lars Johanning

    (Renewable Energy Group, Faculty of Environment, Science, and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
    College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

Abstract

In this research, a hierarchical met-ocean data selection model is proposed to reduce the computational cost in stochastic simulation of operation and maintenance (O&M) and enable rapid evaluation of offshore renewable energy systems. The proposed model identifies the most representative data for each calendar month from the long-term historical met-ocean data in two steps, namely the preselection and the refined selection. The preselection incorporates three distinct metrics to evaluate the characteristics of statistical distributions, including the Jensen–Shannon divergence, the encapsulation of extreme met-ocean conditions, as well as the overall vessel accessibility. For the refined selection, a component of temporal synchrony is devised to emulate dynamic changes of met-ocean conditions. As such, a met-ocean reference year comprising twelve representative historical months is subsequently produced and deployed as the input for O&M stochastic simulation. While this research focuses on the development of a generalised methodology for selecting representative met-ocean data, the proposed statistical method is validated empirically using a case study inspired by real-life floating offshore wind installations in Scotland, e.g., Hywind and Kincardine projects. According to the O&M simulation results with five capacity scenarios, the proposed data selection model reduces the computational cost by up to 97.65% while emulating the original results with minor deviations, i.e., within ± 5%. The simulation speed is therefore 43 times quicker. Overall, the proposed met-ocean data selection model attains an excellent trade off between computational efficiency and accuracy in O&M stochastic simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailun Xie & Lars Johanning, 2023. "A Hierarchical Met-Ocean Data Selection Model for Fast O&M Simulation in Offshore Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1471-:d:1055372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1471/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1471/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Xinxin & Robertson, Bryson & Buckham, Bradley, 2020. "A techno-economic approach to wave energy resource assessment and development site identification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Giovanni Rinaldi & Philipp R. Thies & Lars Johanning, 2021. "Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Martin, Rebecca & Lazakis, Iraklis & Barbouchi, Sami & Johanning, Lars, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of offshore wind farm operation and maintenance cost and availability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1226-1236.
    4. Rinaldi, Giovanni & Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Jeffrey, Henry & Thies, Philipp R. & Johanning, Lars, 2021. "Incorporating stochastic operation and maintenance models into the techno-economic analysis of floating offshore wind farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    5. Lozano, Miguel A. & Ramos, Jose C. & Serra, Luis M., 2010. "Cost optimization of the design of CHCP (combined heat, cooling and power) systems under legal constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 794-805.
    6. Thomas Michael Welte & Iver Bakken Sperstad & Espen Høegh Sørum & Magne Lorentzen Kolstad, 2017. "Integration of Degradation Processes in a Strategic Offshore Wind Farm O&M Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Mavrotas, George & Diakoulaki, Danae & Florios, Kostas & Georgiou, Paraskevas, 2008. "A mathematical programming framework for energy planning in services' sector buildings under uncertainty in load demand: The case of a hospital in Athens," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2415-2429, July.
    8. Pérez, Beatriz & Mínguez, Roberto & Guanche, Raúl, 2013. "Offshore wind farm layout optimization using mathematical programming techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 389-399.
    9. Johnstone, C.M. & Pratt, D. & Clarke, J.A. & Grant, A.D., 2013. "A techno-economic analysis of tidal energy technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 101-106.
    10. Benjamin Pakenham & Anna Ermakova & Ali Mehmanparast, 2021. "A Review of Life Extension Strategies for Offshore Wind Farms Using Techno-Economic Assessments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Ashuri, T. & Zaaijer, M.B. & Martins, J.R.R.A. & van Bussel, G.J.W. & van Kuik, G.A.M., 2014. "Multidisciplinary design optimization of offshore wind turbines for minimum levelized cost of energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 893-905.
    12. Kang, Jichuan & Sun, Liping & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Fault Tree Analysis of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1455-1467.
    13. Lucas, Tiago R. & Ferreira, Ana F. & Santos Pereira, R.B. & Alves, Marco, 2022. "Hydrogen production from the WindFloat Atlantic offshore wind farm: A techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    14. Franco, Brais Armiño & Baptista, Patrícia & Neto, Rui Costa & Ganilha, Sofia, 2021. "Assessment of offloading pathways for wind-powered offshore hydrogen production: Energy and economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    15. Poncelet, Kris & Delarue, Erik & Six, Daan & Duerinck, Jan & D’haeseleer, William, 2016. "Impact of the level of temporal and operational detail in energy-system planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 631-643.
    16. Charlton, T.S. & Rouainia, M., 2022. "Geotechnical fragility analysis of monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines in extreme storms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1126-1140.
    17. Mallapragada, Dharik S. & Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. & Venkatesh, Aranya & Lara, Cristiana L. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2018. "Impact of model resolution on scenario outcomes for electricity sector system expansion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1231-1244.
    18. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Rinaldi, Giovanni & Thies, Philipp R. & Johanning, Lars & Jeffrey, Henry, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of floating offshore wind farms: An evaluation of operation and maintenance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    19. Brodrick, Philip G. & Brandt, Adam R. & Durlofsky, Louis J., 2018. "Optimal design and operation of integrated solar combined cycles under emissions intensity constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 979-990.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Hoffmann & Leander Kotzur & Detlef Stolten & Martin Robinius, 2020. "A Review on Time Series Aggregation Methods for Energy System Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-61, February.
    2. Teichgraeber, Holger & Lindenmeyer, Constantin P. & Baumgärtner, Nils & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef & Robinius, Martin & Bardow, André & Brandt, Adam R., 2020. "Extreme events in time series aggregation: A case study for optimal residential energy supply systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Hoffmann, Maximilian & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef, 2022. "The Pareto-optimal temporal aggregation of energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    4. Brooks, Sam & Mahmood, Minhal & Roy, Rajkumar & Manolesos, Marinos & Salonitis, Konstantinos, 2023. "Self-reconfiguration simulations of turbines to reduce uneven farm degradation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1301-1314.
    5. Hoffmann, Maximilian & Priesmann, Jan & Nolting, Lars & Praktiknjo, Aaron & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef, 2021. "Typical periods or typical time steps? A multi-model analysis to determine the optimal temporal aggregation for energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Fazlollahi, Samira & Mandel, Pierre & Becker, Gwenaelle & Maréchal, Francois, 2012. "Methods for multi-objective investment and operating optimization of complex energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 12-22.
    7. Carvalho, Monica & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M., 2012. "Multicriteria synthesis of trigeneration systems considering economic and environmental aspects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 245-254.
    8. Scott, Ian J. & Carvalho, Pedro M.S. & Botterud, Audun & Silva, Carlos A., 2019. "Clustering representative days for power systems generation expansion planning: Capturing the effects of variable renewables and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Mirko M. Stojiljković & Mladen M. Stojiljković & Bratislav D. Blagojević, 2014. "Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization of Trigeneration Plants Based on Metaheuristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Li, He & Teixeira, Angelo P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "A two-stage Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1438-1461.
    11. Mallikarjun, Sreekanth & Lewis, Herbert F., 2014. "Energy technology allocation for distributed energy resources: A strategic technology-policy framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 783-799.
    12. Ashouri, Araz & Fux, Samuel S. & Benz, Michael J. & Guzzella, Lino, 2013. "Optimal design and operation of building services using mixed-integer linear programming techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 365-376.
    13. Han Peng & Songyin Li & Linjian Shangguan & Yisa Fan & Hai Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of Wind Turbine Equipment Failure and Intelligent Operation and Maintenance Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    14. Roggenburg, Michael & Esquivel-Puentes, Helber A. & Vacca, Andrea & Bocanegra Evans, Humberto & Garcia-Bravo, Jose M. & Warsinger, David M. & Ivantysynova, Monika & Castillo, Luciano, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of a hydraulic transmission for floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1194-1204.
    15. Yeganefar, Ali & Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad Kazem, 2020. "Improvement of representative days selection in power system planning by incorporating the extreme days of the net load to take account of the variability and intermittency of renewable resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    16. Pérez-Iribarren, E. & González-Pino, I. & Azkorra-Larrinaga, Z. & Gómez-Arriarán, I., 2020. "Optimal design and operation of thermal energy storage systems in micro-cogeneration plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    17. Schütz, Thomas & Schraven, Markus Hans & Fuchs, Marcus & Remmen, Peter & Müller, Dirk, 2018. "Comparison of clustering algorithms for the selection of typical demand days for energy system synthesis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 570-582.
    18. Thomas Heggarty & Jean-Yves Bourmaud & Robin Girard & Georges Kariniotakis, 2024. "Assessing the relative impacts of maximum investment rate and temporal detail in capacity expansion models applied to power systems," Post-Print hal-04383397, HAL.
    19. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J. & Coraddu, A., 2023. "Opportunistic maintenance for offshore wind: A review and proposal of future framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Li, Mingquan & Virguez, Edgar & Shan, Rui & Tian, Jialin & Gao, Shuo & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2022. "High-resolution data shows China’s wind and solar energy resources are enough to support a 2050 decarbonized electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1471-:d:1055372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.