IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5558-d629747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Catalyst Distribution Optimization Scheme for Effective Green Hydrogen Production from Biogas Reforming

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Pajak

    (Department of Fundamental Research in Energy Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Brus

    (Department of Fundamental Research in Energy Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Janusz S. Szmyd

    (Department of Fundamental Research in Energy Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Green hydrogen technology has recently gained in popularity due to the current economic and ecological trends that aim to remove the fossil fuels share in the energy mix. Among various alternatives, biogas reforming is an attractive choice for hydrogen production. To meet the authorities’ requirements, reforming biogas-enriched natural gas and sole biogas is tempting. Highly effective process conditions of biogas reforming are yet to be designed. The current state of the art lacks proper optimization of the process conditions. The optimization should aim to allow for maximization of the process effectiveness and limitation of the phenomena having an adverse influence on the process itself. One of the issues that should be addressed in optimization is the uniformity of temperature inside a reactor. Here we show an optimization design study that aims to unify temperature distribution by novel arrangements of catalysts segments in the model biogas reforming reactor. The acquired numerical results confirm the possibility of the enhancement of reaction effectiveness, coming from improving the thermal conditions. The used amount of catalytic material is remarkably reduced as a side effect of the presented optimization. To ensure an unhindered perception of the reaction improvement, the authors proposed a ratio of the hydrogen output and the amount of used catalyst as a measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Pajak & Grzegorz Brus & Janusz S. Szmyd, 2021. "Catalyst Distribution Optimization Scheme for Effective Green Hydrogen Production from Biogas Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5558-:d:629747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5558/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5558/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Gonçalves & Jaime Filipe Puna & Luís Guerra & José Campos Rodrigues & João Fernando Gomes & Maria Teresa Santos & Diogo Alves, 2019. "Towards the Development of Syngas/Biomethane Electrolytic Production, Using Liquefied Biomass and Heterogeneous Catalyst," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Prashanth Reddy Buchireddy & Devin Peck & Mark Zappi & Ray Mark Bricka, 2021. "Catalytic Hot Gas Cleanup of Biomass Gasification Producer Gas via Steam Reforming Using Nickel-Supported Clay Minerals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Arslan Mazhar & Asif Hussain Khoja & Abul Kalam Azad & Faisal Mushtaq & Salman Raza Naqvi & Sehar Shakir & Muhammad Hassan & Rabia Liaquat & Mustafa Anwar, 2021. "Performance Analysis of TiO 2 -Modified Co/MgAl 2 O 4 Catalyst for Dry Reforming of Methane in a Fixed Bed Reactor for Syngas (H 2 , CO) Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Hyunyong Lee & Inchul Jung & Gilltae Roh & Youngseung Na & Hokeun Kang, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO 2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Jack Pegram & Gioia Falcone & Athanasios Kolios, 2018. "A Review of Job Role Localization in the Oil and Gas Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Iwai, H. & Yamamoto, Y. & Saito, M. & Yoshida, H., 2011. "Numerical simulation of intermediate-temperature direct-internal-reforming planar solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2225-2234.
    7. Freida Ozavize Ayodele & Siti Indati Mustapa & Bamidele Victor Ayodele & Norsyahida Mohammad, 2020. "An Overview of Economic Analysis and Environmental Impacts of Natural Gas Conversion Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Kaczmarczyk, 2021. "Thermodynamic Analysis of the Effect of Green Hydrogen Addition to a Fuel Mixture on the Steam Methane Reforming Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Arturo de Risi & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese, 2023. "Advanced Technologies for Green Hydrogen Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-4, March.
    3. Marcin Pajak & Grzegorz Brus & Shinji Kimijima & Janusz S. Szmyd, 2023. "Enhancing Hydrogen Production from Biogas through Catalyst Rearrangements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Pajak & Grzegorz Brus & Shinji Kimijima & Janusz S. Szmyd, 2023. "Enhancing Hydrogen Production from Biogas through Catalyst Rearrangements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Jinling Song & Chuyang Tang & Xinyuan An & Yi Wang & Shankun Zhou & Chunhong Huang, 2022. "Catalytic Pyrolysis of Sawdust with Desulfurized Fly Ash for Pyrolysis Gas Upgrading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Ding, Haoran & Tong, Sirui & Qi, Zhifu & Liu, Fei & Sun, Shien & Han, Long, 2023. "Syngas production from chemical-looping steam methane reforming: The effect of channel geometry on BaCoO3/CeO2 monolithic oxygen carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    4. Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Biomass gasification integrated with a solid oxide fuel cell and Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 6-18.
    5. Vladislav Sadykov, 2023. "Advances in Hydrogen and Syngas Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-4, March.
    6. Khazaee, I. & Rava, A., 2017. "Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 235-244.
    7. Park, Hoyoung & Byun, Jaewon & Han, Jeehoon, 2021. "Economically feasible thermochemical process for methanol production from kenaf," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Zeng, Zezhi & Qian, Yuping & Zhang, Yangjun & Hao, Changkun & Dan, Dan & Zhuge, Weilin, 2020. "A review of heat transfer and thermal management methods for temperature gradient reduction in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stacks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Dang, Zheng & Xu, Han, 2016. "Pore scale investigation of gaseous mixture flow in porous anode of solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 295-304.
    10. Jack Pegram & Gioia Falcone & Athanasios Kolios, 2019. "Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Job Role Localization in the Oil and Gas Industry: Global Experiences and National Differences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Wang, Ligang & Rao, Megha & Diethelm, Stefan & Lin, Tzu-En & Zhang, Hanfei & Hagen, Anke & Maréchal, François & Van herle, Jan, 2019. "Power-to-methane via co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2: The effects of pressurized operation and internal methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1432-1445.
    12. Lee, Sanghyeok & Park, Mansoo & Kim, Hyoungchul & Yoon, Kyung Joong & Son, Ji-Won & Lee, Jong-Ho & Kim, Byung-Kook & Choi, Wonjoon & Hong, Jongsup, 2017. "Thermal conditions and heat transfer characteristics of high-temperature solid oxide fuel cells investigated by three-dimensional numerical simulations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 293-305.
    13. Rashid, Kashif & Dong, Sang Keun & Mehran, Muhammad Taqi, 2017. "Numerical investigations to determine the optimal operating conditions for 1 kW-class flat-tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 673-691.
    14. Lei, Yang & Chen, Yuming & Chen, Jinghai & Liu, Xinyan & Wu, Xiaoqin & Chen, Yuqiu, 2023. "A novel modeling strategy for the prediction on the concentration of H2 and CH4 in raw coke oven gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Xenos, Dionysios P. & Hofmann, Philipp & Panopoulos, Kyriakos D. & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Detailed transient thermal simulation of a planar SOFC (solid oxide fuel cell) using gPROMS™," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 84-102.
    16. Raza, Jehangeer & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Anwar, Mustafa & Saleem, Faisal & Naqvi, Salman Raza & Liaquat, Rabia & Hassan, Muhammad & Javaid, Rahat & Qazi, Umair Yaqub & Lumbers, Brock, 2022. "Methane decomposition for hydrogen production: A comprehensive review on catalyst selection and reactor systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Mounir, Hamid & Belaiche, Mohamed & El Marjani, Abdellatif & El Gharad, Abdellah, 2014. "Thermal stress and probability of survival investigation in a multi-bundle integrated-planar solid oxide fuel cells IP-SOFC (integrated-planar solid oxide fuel cell)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 378-386.
    18. Katla, Daria & Jurczyk, Michał & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Uchman, Wojciech, 2021. "Analysis of the integrated system of electrolysis and methanation units for the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    19. Inal, Omer Berkehan & Charpentier, Jean-Frédéric & Deniz, Cengiz, 2022. "Hybrid power and propulsion systems for ships: Current status and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Marco Milanese & Gianpiero Colangelo & Arturo de Risi, 2023. "Progress in CO 2 Conversion Using Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-3, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5558-:d:629747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.