IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5259-d621392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enablers and Barriers in the Market-Driven Rollout of Smart Metering: Polish Technology Innovation System Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maksymilian Kochański

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland
    Research and Innovation Centre Pro-Akademia, 95-050 Konstantynów Łódzki, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Korczak

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland
    Research and Innovation Centre Pro-Akademia, 95-050 Konstantynów Łódzki, Poland)

  • Tadeusz Skoczkowski

    (Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

This paper is the first country-specific analysis of the market-driven Smart Metering innovation system, covering technologies, actors, and policies. It provides new insights on the key enablers and barriers in the rollout of electricity Smart Meters (SMs) without binding regulatory mandate. The presented research is based on the Technology Innovation System (TIS) analysis for Poland, where an obligation scheme for the rolling out of SMs has been introduced very recently. Still, the number of SMs installed places the country in the top 10 Member States of the European Union. The implementation of SMs is progressing in a complex, multi-actor innovation system, shaped by the leading role of Distribution System Operators (DSOs). The article analyses the key elements of the SM innovation system (technologies and infrastructures, actors and networks, institutions and policies) and characterizes their interaction based on desk research and a critical assessment of regulations, statistics, and literature. The major enablers of the rollout are DSOs expectations of benefits, which have been instigated by the market regulator’s benevolence in tariffs approval. On the other hand, the major barriers are delayed and incomplete public policy instruments. Results of the study can inform the development of other market-driven SM deployments around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Maksymilian Kochański & Katarzyna Korczak & Tadeusz Skoczkowski, 2021. "Enablers and Barriers in the Market-Driven Rollout of Smart Metering: Polish Technology Innovation System Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5259-:d:621392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anda, Martin & Temmen, Justin, 2014. "Smart metering for residential energy efficiency: The use of community based social marketing for behavioural change and smart grid introduction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 119-127.
    2. J. Schächtele & J. Uhlenbrock, 2012. "How to Regulate a Market-Driven Rollout of Smart Meters? A Multi-Sided Market Perspective," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 13(3), pages 273-306, September.
    3. Petr Spodniak & Ari Jantunen & Satu Viljainen, 2014. "Diffusion and Drivers of Smart Meters: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(03), pages 1-16.
    4. Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Verdolini, Elena & Bielecki, Sławomir & Kochański, Max & Korczak, Katarzyna & Węglarz, Arkadiusz, 2020. "Technology innovation system analysis of decarbonisation options in the EU steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Markard, Jochen & Erlinghagen, Sabine, 2017. "Technology users and standardization: Game changing strategies in the field of smart meter technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 226-235.
    6. Geels, F.W. & Sareen, S & Hook, A. & Sovacool, B.K., 2021. "Navigating implementation dilemmas in technology-forcing policies: A comparative analysis of accelerated smart meter diffusion in the Netherlands, UK, Norway, and Portugal (2000-2019)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    7. Rosenow, Jan & Skoczkowski, Tadeusz & Thomas, Samuel & Węglarz, Arkadiusz & Stańczyk, Wojciech & Jędra, Michał, 2020. "Evaluating the Polish White Certificate scheme," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Yash Chawla & Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Paulo Duarte Silveira, 2019. "Marketing and communications channels for diffusion of smart meters in Portugal," HSC Research Reports HSC/19/05, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Technology.
    9. Maksymilian Kochański & Katarzyna Korczak & Tadeusz Skoczkowski, 2020. "Technology Innovation System Analysis of Electricity Smart Metering in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Bert Willems & Juulia Zhou, 2020. "The Clean Energy Package and Demand Response: Setting Correct Incentives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kung, Chih-Chun & Lan, Xiaolong & Yang, Yunxia & Kung, Shan-Shan & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2022. "Effects of green bonds on Taiwan's bioenergy development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Lina Montuori & Manuel Alcázar-Ortega, 2021. "District Heating as Demand Response Aggregator: Estimation of the Flexible Potential in the Italian Peninsula," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Fouad, M.M. & Kanarachos, Stratis & Allam, Mahmoud, 2022. "Perceptions of consumers towards smart and sustainable energy market services: The role of early adopters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 14-33.
    4. Adam Dominiak & Artur Rusowicz, 2022. "Change of Fossil-Fuel-Related Carbon Productivity Index of the Main Manufacturing Sectors in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Zhang, Yanfang & Wei, Jinpeng & Gao, Qi & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2022. "Coordination between the energy-consumption permit trading scheme and carbon emissions trading: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Xi, Xun & Xi, Baoxing & Miao, Chenglin & Yu, Rongjian & Xie, Jie & Xiang, Rong & Hu, Feng, 2022. "Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Ponce, Pedro & Polasko, Kenneth & Molina, Arturo, 2016. "End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: Acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 587-598.
    8. Sourav Khanna & Victor Becerra & Adib Allahham & Damian Giaouris & Jamie M. Foster & Keiron Roberts & David Hutchinson & Jim Fawcett, 2020. "Demand Response Model Development for Smart Households Using Time of Use Tariffs and Optimal Control—The Isle of Wight Energy Autonomous Community Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Lee, Won Sang & Sohn, So Young, 2018. "Effects of standardization on the evolution of information and communications technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 308-317.
    10. Giacomo Di Foggia & Massimo Beccarello & Marco Borgarello & Francesca Bazzocchi & Stefano Moscarelli, 2022. "Market-Based Instruments to Promote Energy Efficiency: Insights from the Italian Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Yu-Chiao Lu & Liviu Brabie & Andrey V. Karasev & Chuan Wang, 2022. "Applications of Hydrochar and Charcoal in the Iron and Steelmaking Industry—Part 2: Carburization of Liquid Iron by Addition of Iron–Carbon Briquettes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Zhang, Yanfang & Gao, Qi & Wei, Jinpeng & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Can China's energy-consumption permit trading scheme achieve the “Porter” effect? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Hortay, Olivér & Kökény, László, 2020. "A villamosenergia-fogyasztás elhalasztásával kapcsolatos lakossági attitűd felmérése Magyarországon [A survey of popular attitudes to deferment of electricity consumption in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 657-687.
    14. Marques, Vítor & Costa, Paulo Moisés & Bento, Nuno, 2022. "Greater than the sum: On regulating innovation in electricity distribution networks with externalities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Emilio Ghiani & Riccardo Trevisan & Gian Luca Rosetti & Sergio Olivero & Luca Barbero, 2022. "Energetic and Economic Performances of the Energy Community of Magliano Alpi after One Year of Piloting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Annala, Salla & Ruggiero, Salvatore & Kangas, Hanna-Liisa & Honkapuro, Samuli & Ohrling, Tiina, 2022. "Impact of home market on business development and internationalization of demand response firms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Luca Mendicino & Daniele Menniti & Anna Pinnarelli & Nicola Sorrentino & Pasquale Vizza & Claudio Alberti & Francesco Dura, 2021. "DSO Flexibility Market Framework for Renewable Energy Community of Nanogrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Byrka & Jakub Serek, 2020. "How to Foster the Adoption of Electricity Smart Meters? A Longitudinal Field Study of Residential Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Calver, Philippa & Simcock, Neil, 2021. "Demand response and energy justice: A critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Han Chu & Jiaming He & Yisheng Yang & Yong Huang & Shiman Wang & Yunna Wu, 2022. "Economic-Environmental-Social Benefits Assessment of Wind Power Hydrogen Production Project Based on Cloud-MULTIMOORA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5259-:d:621392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.