IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i10p2873-d555629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electricity Market in Brazil: A Critical Review on the Ongoing Reform

Author

Listed:
  • André Quites Ordovás Santos

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration (UNILA), Paraná, CEP 85866-000, Brazil)

  • Adriel Rodrigues da Silva

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration (UNILA), Paraná, CEP 85866-000, Brazil)

  • Jorge Javier Gimenez Ledesma

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration (UNILA), Paraná, CEP 85866-000, Brazil)

  • Adriano Batista de Almeida

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, State University of Western Paraná (UNIOESTE), Paraná, CEP 85870-650, Brazil)

  • Marco Roberto Cavallari

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration (UNILA), Paraná, CEP 85866-000, Brazil)

  • Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior

    (Research Group on Energy & Energy Sustainability (GPEnSE/CNPq), Federal University of Latin American Integration (UNILA), Paraná, CEP 85866-000, Brazil
    Department of Electrical Engineering, State University of Western Paraná (UNIOESTE), Paraná, CEP 85870-650, Brazil)

Abstract

With the current worsening of climate change-associated risks, the transition to low-carbon energy sources has become a global priority. In this context, the advances in the implementation of smart grids, which, in addition to greater efficiency and resilience, also allow greater penetration of renewable distributed energy resources, are becoming increasingly important. However, the necessary investments will be colossal. Many specialists see the process of opening up the electric energy markets as essential to boosting these new technologies. Greater decentralization of the decision-making process can potentially promote greater scalability. However, not all liberalization reforms have led to good results. Several researchers have been evaluating experiences in different countries. Brazil, a country with continental dimensions and peculiar characteristics, already counts with a mostly renewable electric energy generation mix. In recent decades, however, it has become increasingly dependent on fossil fuel sources. Brazil has been conducting a process of opening the electric energy market since the 1990s. This process has faced a series of barriers. This article presents a critical bibliographic review of the Brazilian Power System history and its ongoing opening process, its possible successes and errors, as well as its perspectives and challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • André Quites Ordovás Santos & Adriel Rodrigues da Silva & Jorge Javier Gimenez Ledesma & Adriano Batista de Almeida & Marco Roberto Cavallari & Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, 2021. "Electricity Market in Brazil: A Critical Review on the Ongoing Reform," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2873-:d:555629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/10/2873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2008. "Competitive Electricity Markets: Questions Remain about Design, Implementation, Performance," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 74-87, March.
    2. Michael Grubb and David Newbery, 2018. "UK Electricity Market Reform and the Energy Transition: Emerging Lessons," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 6).
    3. Munson, Richard, 2005. "From Edison to Enron," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 51-61, November.
    4. Yael Parag & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Electricity market design for the prosumer era," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(4), pages 1-6, April.
    5. de A. Dantas, Guilherme & de Castro, Nivalde J. & Dias, Luis & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Vardiero, Pedro & Brandão, Roberto & Rosental, Rubens & Zamboni, Lucca, 2018. "Public policies for smart grids in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 501-512.
    6. Paul L. Joskow, 2001. "California's Electricity Crisis," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 365-388.
    7. Mayer, Klaus & Trück, Stefan, 2018. "Electricity markets around the world," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 77-100.
    8. Paul L. Joskow, 2008. "Lessons Learned from Electricity Market Liberalization," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 9-42.
    9. Stephen Littlechild, 2016. "Contrasting Developments in UK Energy Regulation: Retail Policy and Consumer Engagement," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 118-132, June.
    10. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    11. Paul L Joskow, 2019. "Challenges for wholesale electricity markets with intermittent renewable generation at scale: the US experience," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 35(2), pages 291-331.
    12. Lüth, Alexandra & Zepter, Jan Martin & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging, Ruud, 2018. "Local electricity market designs for peer-to-peer trading: The role of battery flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1233-1243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Štefan Bojnec & Alan Križaj, 2021. "Electricity Markets during the Liberalization: The Case of a European Union Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Rodrigo Antonio Sbardeloto Kraemer & Douglas Pereira Dias & Alisson Carlos da Silva & Marcos Aurelio Izumida Martins & Mathias Arno Ludwig, 2022. "Cost and Cybersecurity Challenges in the Commissioning of Microgrids in Critical Infrastructure: COGE Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Robson Porsch Delavechia & Bibiana P. Ferraz & Raul Scapini Weiand & Leonardo Silveira & Maicon Jaderson Silveira Ramos & Laura Lisiane Callai dos Santos & Daniel Pinheiro Bernardon & Rui Anderson Fer, 2023. "Electricity Supply Regulations in South America: A Review of Regulatory Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-33, January.
    4. Maestri, Cláudia Olímpia Neves Mamede & Andrade, Maria Elisabeth Moreira Carvalho, 2022. "Priorities for tariff compensation of distributed electricity generation in Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Frederico de Oliveira Assuncao & Luiz Eduardo Borges-da-Silva & Helcio Francisco Villa-Nova & Erik Leandro Bonaldi & Levy Ely Lacerda Oliveira & Germano Lambert-Torres & Carlos Eduardo Teixeira & Wils, 2021. "Reduced Scale Laboratory for Training and Research in Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies for Combustion Engine Power Plants and a Novel Method for Monitoring of Inlet and Exhaust Valves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Mateusz Piwowarski & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2021. "The Problem of Non-Typical Objects in the Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of the Level of Renewable Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    3. Siripha Junlakarn & Phimsupha Kokchang & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Drivers and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Filipe Bandeiras & Álvaro Gomes & Mário Gomes & Paulo Coelho, 2023. "Exploring Energy Trading Markets in Smart Grid and Microgrid Systems and Their Implications for Sustainability in Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-41, January.
    5. Ahl, Amanda & Goto, Mika & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities of blockchain energy applications: Interrelatedness among technological, economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Erten, Ibrahim, 2022. "Price spikes, temporary price caps, and welfare effects of regulatory interventions on wholesale electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Javier Parra-Domínguez & Esteban Sánchez & Ángel Ordóñez, 2023. "The Prosumer: A Systematic Review of the New Paradigm in Energy and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-44, July.
    8. Ableitner, Liliane & Tiefenbeck, Verena & Meeuw, Arne & Wörner, Anselma & Fleisch, Elgar & Wortmann, Felix, 2020. "User behavior in a real-world peer-to-peer electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Kobashi, Takuro & Yoshida, Takahiro & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Naito, Katsuhiko & Pfenninger, Stefan & Say, Kelvin & Takeda, Yasuhiro & Ahl, Amanda & Yarime, Masaru & Hara, Keishiro, 2020. "On the potential of “Photovoltaics + Electric vehicles” for deep decarbonization of Kyoto’s power systems: Techno-economic-social considerations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    10. Liu, Jinqi & Wang, Jihong & Cardinal, Joel, 2022. "Evolution and reform of UK electricity market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Tin Cheuk Leung & Kwok Ping Ping & Kevin K. Tsui, 2019. "What can deregulators deregulate? The case of electricity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-32, August.
    12. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Farrell, Niall, 2021. "The increasing cost of ignoring Coase: Inefficient electricity tariffs, welfare loss and welfare-reducing technological change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Simshauser, Paul, 2022. "Rooftop solar PV and the peak load problem in the NEM's Queensland region," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Dzikri Firmansyah Hakam, 2018. "Market Power Modelling in Electricity Market: A Critical Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 347-356.
    16. Davarzani, Sima & Pisica, Ioana & Taylor, Gareth A. & Munisami, Kevin J., 2021. "Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Koasidis, Konstantinos & Marinakis, Vangelis & Nikas, Alexandros & Chira, Katerina & Flamos, Alexandros & Doukas, Haris, 2022. "Monetising behavioural change as a policy measure to support energy management in the residential sector: A case study in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Rafal Weron & Florian Ziel, 2018. "Electricity price forecasting," HSC Research Reports HSC/18/08, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Technology.
    19. Gourisetti, Sri Nikhil Gupta & Sebastian-Cardenas, D. Jonathan & Bhattarai, Bishnu & Wang, Peng & Widergren, Steve & Borkum, Mark & Randall, Alysha, 2021. "Blockchain smart contract reference framework and program logic architecture for transactive energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    20. Yildizbasi, Abdullah, 2021. "Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 183-197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:10:p:2873-:d:555629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.