IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i5p880-d211637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regulatory Framework for Market Transparency in Future Power Systems under the Web-of-Cells Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Viktorija Bobinaite

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, Laboratory for Energy System Research, Breslaujos Street, 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Marialaura Di Somma

    (Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Energy Technologies Department—Portici Research Centre, P. E. Fermi, 1, IT-80055 Portici (Naples), Italy)

  • Giorgio Graditi

    (Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Energy Technologies Department—Portici Research Centre, P. E. Fermi, 1, IT-80055 Portici (Naples), Italy)

  • Irina Oleinikova

    (Department of Electric Power Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, O.S. Bragstads Plass 2, Electrobygget, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

This paper investigates the regulatory rules of market transparency which could be applied within the wholesale electricity market and market for frequency and voltage control in the Web-of-Cells (WoC) decentralized power control architecture, which has been developed in the ELECTRA Project to respond the challenges and needs of the future power system (2030+). In this decentralized functional architecture for frequency and voltage control, the European Union (EU) power grid is divided into grid control areas, i.e., cells, which are defined as portions of the grid having adequate monitoring infrastructure and local reserves capacity, allowing voltage and balancing (frequency) problems to be solved at cell level, under the responsibility of a Cell System Operator (CSO) (present Distribution System Operator (DSO)/Transmission System Operator (TSO)). In order to foster the practical realization of the WoC-based architecture, the related wholesale electricity market and market for frequency and voltage control are proposed considering the competitive market principles, including transparency. The critical review of the existing EU regulations dealing with this issue suggests respecting the valid provisions on market transparency while tailoring them into the WoC-based architecture. Moreover, in order to take into account the WoC peculiarities, a set of integrations to the current regulatory rules is also proposed, addressing: (1) disclosure of information in respect to attributes of emerging technologies such as renewable energy sources (RES), distributed energy resources (DER), storage; (2) provision of generation and load forecast information; (3) process of procurement of flexibilities; (4) retail market transparency; (5) disclosure of privacy-sensitive household attributes; and (6) disclosure of information on market for frequency and voltage control.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktorija Bobinaite & Marialaura Di Somma & Giorgio Graditi & Irina Oleinikova, 2019. "The Regulatory Framework for Market Transparency in Future Power Systems under the Web-of-Cells Concept," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:880-:d:211637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pär Holmberg & Frank Wolak, 2015. "Electricity markets: Designing auctions where suppliers have uncertain costs," Working Papers EPRG 1523, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    2. Bessembinder, Hendrik & Maxwell, William & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2006. "Market transparency, liquidity externalities, and institutional trading costs in corporate bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 251-288, November.
    3. Chen, Wen & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin & Wu, Cheng, 2017. "Data quality of electricity consumption data in a smart grid environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 98-105.
    4. Hirth, Lion & Mühlenpfordt, Jonathan & Bulkeley, Marisa, 2018. "The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform – A review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1054-1067.
    5. Wiese, Frauke & Schlecht, Ingmar & Bunke, Wolf-Dieter & Gerbaulet, Clemens & Hirth, Lion & Jahn, Martin & Kunz, Friedrich & Lorenz, Casimir & Mühlenpfordt, Jonathan & Reimann, Juliane & Schill, Wolf-P, 2019. "Open Power System Data – Frictionless data for electricity system modelling," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 236, pages 401-409.
    6. Meredith Beechey & David Gruen & James Vickery, 2000. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis: A Survey," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2000-01, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    7. Nils-Henrik M. von der Fehr, 2013. "Transparency in Electricity Markets," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    8. Bae, Hyunhoe & Yu, Sanguk, 2018. "Information and coercive regulation: The impact of fuel mix information disclosure on states’ adoption of renewable energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 151-159.
    9. Markard, Jochen & Holt, Edward, 2003. "Disclosure of electricity products--lessons from consumer research as guidance for energy policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 1459-1474, November.
    10. David P. Brown & Andrew Eckert & James Lin, 2018. "Information and transparency in wholesale electricity markets: evidence from Alberta," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 292-330, December.
    11. Aasen, M. & Westskog, H. & Wilhite, H. & Lindberg, M., 2010. "The EU electricity disclosure from the business perspective--A study from Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7921-7928, December.
    12. Yang Yang & Minglei Bao & Yi Ding & Yonghua Song & Zhenzhi Lin & Changzheng Shao, 2018. "Review of Information Disclosure in Different Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minas Patsalides & Christina N. Papadimitriou & Venizelos Efthymiou & Roberto Ciavarella & Marialaura Di Somma & Anna Wakszyńska & Michał Kosmecki & Giorgio Graditi & Maria Valenti, 2020. "Frequency Stability Evaluation in Low Inertia Systems Utilizing Smart Hierarchical Controllers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Bartłomiej Mroczek & Paweł Pijarski, 2022. "Machine Learning in Operating of Low Voltage Future Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmaeili Aliabadi, Danial & Chan, Katrina, 2022. "The emerging threat of artificial intelligence on competition in liberalized electricity markets: A deep Q-network approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    2. David P. Brown & Andrew Eckert, 2022. "Pricing Patterns in Wholesale Electricity Markets: Unilateral Market Power or Coordinated Behavior?," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 168-216, March.
    3. David P. Brown & Andrew Eckert & James Lin, 2018. "Information and transparency in wholesale electricity markets: evidence from Alberta," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 292-330, December.
    4. Mahler, Valentin & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, Georges, 2022. "Data-driven structural modeling of electricity price dynamics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Yan, Jie & Möhrlen, Corinna & Göçmen, Tuhfe & Kelly, Mark & Wessel, Arne & Giebel, Gregor, 2022. "Uncovering wind power forecasting uncertainty sources and their propagation through the whole modelling chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Bergheimer, Stefan & Cantillon, Estelle & Reguant, Mar, 2023. "Price and quantity discovery without commitment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Zhu, Xufeng & Zhang, Chao, 2012. "Reducing information asymmetry in the power industry: Mandatory and voluntary information disclosure regulations of sulfur dioxide emission," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 704-713.
    8. Markus Klimscheffskij & Thierry Van Craenenbroeck & Marko Lehtovaara & Diane Lescot & Angela Tschernutter & Claudia Raimundo & Dominik Seebach & Christof Timpe, 2015. "Residual Mix Calculation at the Heart of Reliable Electricity Disclosure in Europe—A Case Study on the Effect of the RE-DISS Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-30, May.
    9. Andreas Hefti & Peiyao Shen & Regina Betz, 2019. "Market power and information effects in a multi-unit auction," ECON - Working Papers 320, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    10. Lledó, Llorenç & Ramon, Jaume & Soret, Albert & Doblas-Reyes, Francisco-Javier, 2022. "Seasonal prediction of renewable energy generation in Europe based on four teleconnection indices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 420-430.
    11. Valentin Mahler & Robin Girard & Georges Kariniotakis, 2021. "Data-driven Structural Modeling of Electricity Price Dynamics," Working Papers hal-03445396, HAL.
    12. Brown, David P. & Cajueiro, Daniel O. & Eckert, Andrew & Silveira, Douglas, 2023. "Information and Transparency: Using Machine Learning to Detect Communication," Working Papers 2023-6, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
    13. Oxelheim, Lars & Rafferty, Michael, 2005. "On the static efficiency of secondary bond markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 117-135, April.
    14. Xuanjuan Chen & Jing-Zhi Huang & Zhenzhen Sun & Tong Yao & Tong Yu, 2020. "Liquidity Premium in the Eye of the Beholder: An Analysis of the Clientele Effect in the Corporate Bond Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 932-957, February.
    15. O'Hara, Maureen & Alex Zhou, Xing, 2021. "The electronic evolution of corporate bond dealers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 368-390.
    16. Goldstein, Itay & Jiang, Hao & Ng, David T., 2017. "Investor flows and fragility in corporate bond funds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 592-613.
    17. Joseph, Andreas & Vasios, Michalis, 2022. "OTC Microstructure in a period of stress: A Multi-layered network approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Tang, Dragon Yongjun & Yan, Hong, 2017. "Understanding transactions prices in the credit default swaps market," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-27.
    19. Abd El-Rahman M. Selmy & Khairy A. El-Giziry, 2016. "On the Informational Role of Delayed Good News: A Firm-Level Crash Risk Evidence from Egypt," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-44, August.
    20. Boardman, Brenda & Palmer, Jane, 2007. "Electricity disclosure: The troubled birth of a new policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4947-4958, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:880-:d:211637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.