IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i5p619-d97584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Assessment of a Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Operating at Subcritical and Supercritical Conditions in a Small-Scale Solar Organic Rankine Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Marija Lazova

    (Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, Ghent 9000, Belgium
    Flanders Make, the Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, Lommel 3920, Belgium)

  • Alihan Kaya

    (Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, Ghent 9000, Belgium
    Flanders Make, the Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, Lommel 3920, Belgium)

  • Marijn Billiet

    (Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, Ghent 9000, Belgium
    Flanders Make, the Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, Lommel 3920, Belgium)

  • Steven Lecompte

    (Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, Ghent 9000, Belgium
    Flanders Make, the Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, Lommel 3920, Belgium)

  • Dimitris Manolakos

    (Department of Natural Resources and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos Street 75, Athens 11855, Greece)

  • Michel De Paepe

    (Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, Ghent 9000, Belgium
    Flanders Make, the Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, Lommel 3920, Belgium)

Abstract

In this study, the performance of a helical coil heat exchanger operating at subcritical and supercritical conditions is analysed. The counter-current heat exchanger was specially designed to operate at a maximal pressure and temperature of 42 bar and 200 °C, respectively. The small-scale solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) installation has a net power output of 3 kWe. The first tests were done in a laboratory where an electrical heater was used instead of the concentrated photovoltaic/thermal (CPV/T) collectors. The inlet heating fluid temperature of the water was 95 °C. The effects of different parameters on the heat transfer rate in the heat exchanger were investigated. Particularly, the performance analysis was elaborated considering the changes of the mass flow rate of the working fluid (R-404A) in the range of 0.20–0.33 kg/s and the inlet pressure varying from 18 bar up to 41 bar. Hence, the variation of the heat flux was in the range of 5–9 kW/m 2 . The results show that the working fluid’s mass flow rate has significant influence on the heat transfer rate rather than the operational pressure. Furthermore, from the comparison between the experimental results with the heat transfer correlations from the literature, the experimental results fall within the uncertainty range for the supercritical analysis but there is a deviation of the investigated subcritical correlations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Marijn Billiet & Steven Lecompte & Dimitris Manolakos & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Experimental Assessment of a Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Operating at Subcritical and Supercritical Conditions in a Small-Scale Solar Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:5:p:619-:d:97584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/5/619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/5/619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    2. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    4. Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent & Lebrun, Jean, 2010. "Experimental study and modeling of an Organic Rankine Cycle using scroll expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1260-1268, April.
    5. Marija Lazova & Henk Huisseune & Alihan Kaya & Steven Lecompte & George Kosmadakis & Michel De Paepe, 2016. "Performance Evaluation of a Helical Coil Heat Exchanger Working under Supercritical Conditions in a Solar Organic Rankine Cycle Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Kosmadakis, George & Landelle, Arnaud & Lazova, Marija & Manolakos, Dimitris & Kaya, Alihan & Huisseune, Henk & Karavas, Christos-Spyridon & Tauveron, Nicolas & Revellin, Remi & Haberschill, Philippe , 2016. "Experimental testing of a low-temperature organic Rankine cycle (ORC) engine coupled with concentrating PV/thermal collectors: Laboratory and field tests," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 222-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pathak, Saurabh & Shukla, S.K. & Sagade, Atul A., 2023. "Novel multi-helical coil heat exchanger-based small-scale organic Rankine cycle: A detailed heat transfer analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Sun, Hongchuang & Qin, Jiang & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Huang, Hongyan & Yan, Peigang & Lin, Chih-Hung, 2019. "Effect of flow losses in heat exchangers on the performance of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 391-400.
    3. Yao, Yecheng & Zhu, Qi’an & Li, Zhouhang, 2020. "Performance of helically coiled gas heaters in supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: A detailed assessment under convective boundary condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Hajialigol, Parisa & Fathi, Amirhossein & Saboohi, Yadollah, 2021. "Modeling and optimization of an integrated multi-generation solar system with variable heat to power ratio for supplying residential and industrial demands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 786-798.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycle alternatives for the cement industry using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology and energy-economic-environmental (3E) analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses and evaluations of small-scale dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system using pure fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Soulis, Konstantinos X. & Manolakos, Dimitris & Ntavou, Erika & Kosmadakis, George, 2022. "A geospatial analysis approach for the operational assessment of solar ORC systems. Case study: Performance evaluation of a two-stage solar ORC engine in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 116-128.
    5. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    6. Kermani, Maziar & Wallerand, Anna S. & Kantor, Ivan D. & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Generic superstructure synthesis of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in industrial processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1203-1225.
    7. Jung, Hyung-Chul & Taylor, Leighton & Krumdieck, Susan, 2015. "An experimental and modelling study of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle unit with mixture working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 601-614.
    8. De Pascale, Andrea & Ferrari, Claudio & Melino, Francesco & Morini, Mirko & Pinelli, Michele, 2012. "Integration between a thermophotovoltaic generator and an Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 695-703.
    9. Marcin Jankowski & Aleksandra Borsukiewicz, 2020. "A Novel Exergy Indicator for Maximizing Energy Utilization in Low-Temperature ORC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    11. Shao, Long & Ma, Xinling & Wei, Xinli & Hou, Zhonglan & Meng, Xiangrui, 2017. "Design and experimental study of a small-sized organic Rankine cycle system under various cooling conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 236-245.
    12. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    13. Safarian, Sahar & Saboohi, Yadollah & Kateb, Movaffaq, 2013. "Evaluation of energy recovery and potential of hydrogen production in Iranian natural gas transmission network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 65-77.
    14. Shuozhuo Hu & Zhen Yang & Jian Li & Yuanyuan Duan, 2021. "A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-36, October.
    15. Imran, Muhammad & Pili, Roberto & Usman, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik, 2020. "Dynamic modeling and control strategies of organic Rankine cycle systems: Methods and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    16. Xu, Bin & Rathod, Dhruvang & Yebi, Adamu & Filipi, Zoran & Onori, Simona & Hoffman, Mark, 2019. "A comprehensive review of organic rankine cycle waste heat recovery systems in heavy-duty diesel engine applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-170.
    17. Michael Papapetrou & George Kosmadakis & Francesco Giacalone & Bartolomé Ortega-Delgado & Andrea Cipollina & Alessandro Tamburini & Giorgio Micale, 2019. "Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Performance of Low-Temperature Heat to Power Conversion using a Reverse Electrodialysis – Multi-Effect Distillation System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    19. Ziviani, Davide & Beyene, Asfaw & Venturini, Mauro, 2014. "Advances and challenges in ORC systems modeling for low grade thermal energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 79-95.
    20. Lecompte, Steven & Gusev, Sergei & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2018. "Experimental results of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle: Steady state identification and application to off-design model validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 82-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:5:p:619-:d:97584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.