IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i7p203-d1701682.html

Global Tangerine Trade Market: Revealed Competitiveness and Market Powers

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Yi Chi

    (Chung-Hwa Association of Rural Development, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • Chiao-Chun Chang

    (Department of Applied Economics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan)

  • Li-Hsien Chien

    (Department of Applied Economics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan)

Abstract

The international trade in agricultural products is complex and diverse. Global buyers must diversify their import sources, while sellers must explore new market opportunities. In the past, there has been no analysis on how second-tier exporters, with a smaller market share compared to dominant exporters, interact in the same target market and within an existing trade market and what factors affect trade prices and market forces. Based on Vollrath’s revealed competitive advantage index framework, this study analyzes the global tangerine trade (HS08052100) and means of production from 2008 to 2021, performs clustering, and estimates the residual demand elasticities of two main second-tier exporting countries—South Africa and Morocco—in four major importing countries for empirical analysis. The results show that South African tangerines have a lower market share than Moroccan tangerines in the Netherlands, the United States, and the United Kingdom. However, all data indicate that the residual demand elasticity for the country’s products in the target markets is negative, indicating that South African exporters have market influence in all three markets and significantly affect the prices of Moroccan products in these markets. Unlike other studies that have focused on the ranking analysis of export indices, the novelty of this study is that it provides an oligopolistic framework based on agricultural value chain analysis, which can be used for many countries with limited export scales. The method proposed in this study is expected to help citrus traders to effectively find export markets by evaluating the remaining market niches using key market data and the prices of similar competitors in the same category.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Yi Chi & Chiao-Chun Chang & Li-Hsien Chien, 2025. "Global Tangerine Trade Market: Revealed Competitiveness and Market Powers," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:203-:d:1701682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/7/203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/7/203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marten Graubner & Klaus Salhofer & Christoph Tribl, 2021. "A Line in Space: Pricing, Location, and Market Power in Agricultural Product Markets," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 85-107, October.
    2. Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou & Knetter, Michael M., 1999. "Measuring the intensity of competition in export markets," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 27-60, February.
    3. Marie‐Hélène Felt & Jean‐Philippe Gervais & Bruno Larue, 2011. "Market power and import bans: the case of Japanese pork imports," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 47-61, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nakajima, Toru, 2012. "Estimating Time Variation of Market Power: Case of U.S. Soybean Exports," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124775, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Crespi, John M. & Hahn, William & Jones, Keithly & Schulz, Lee L. & Chen, Chen-Ti, 2016. "A Study in U.S. Export Beef Competitiveness: Do Cattle Inventories Matter?," 2017 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 6-8, 2017, Chicago, Illinois 250113, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Evans, Edwardv A. & Ballen, Fredy H., 2015. "Competitive Behavior in the U.S. Green Skin Avocado Market," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 46(3), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Páll, Zsombor, 2015. "Three essays on the Russian wheat export," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 80, number 80.
    5. Gafarova, Gulmira & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Glauben, Thomas, 2023. "The oligopolistic behavior of Kazakh and Russian wheat exporters in the South Caucasus: Evidence from a residual demand elasticity analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(1-2), pages 1-32.
    6. Tsaiyu Chang & Masafumi Inoue, 2013. "Market Power in the Log and Lumber Import Market in Japan," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 7(2), pages 131-146, May.
    7. Gafarova, Gulmira & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Glauben, Thomas, 2015. "An econometric analysis of market power in Azerbaijani wheat market: Evidence from Kazakhstan and Russia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211642, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Gafarova, Gulmira & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Glauben, Thomas, "undated". "Analysis Of Oligopolistic Behaviour Of Kazakh And Russian Exporters In The South Caucasus Wheat Market," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261429, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Zsombor Pall & Oleksandr Perekhozhuk & Thomas Glauben & Sören Prehn & Ramona Teuber, 2014. "Residual demand measures of market power of Russian wheat exporters," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(3), pages 381-391, May.
    10. Taylor, Christopher T., 2004. "The economic effects of withdrawn antidumping investigations: is there evidence of collusive settlements?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 295-312, March.
    11. Deborah L. Swenson, 2007. "Competition and the location of overseas assembly," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 155-175, February.
    12. Arni, Patrick & Egger, Peter & Erhardt, Katharina & Gubler, Matthias & Sauré, Philip, 2024. "Heterogeneous Impacts of Trade Shocks on Workers," IZA Discussion Papers 16895, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Soregaroli, Claudio & Sckokai, Paolo, "undated". "Modelling Agricultural Commodity Markets under Imperfect Competition," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 116012, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Kerstin Uhl & Oleksandr Perekhozhuk & Thomas Glauben, 2016. "Price Discrimination in Russian Wheat Exports: Evidence from Firm-level Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 722-740, September.
    15. Sushanta Mallick & Helena Marques, 2008. "Passthrough of Exchange Rate and Tariffs into Import Prices of India: Currency Depreciation versus Import Liberalization," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 765-782, September.
    16. Martin Falk & Rahel Falk, 2000. "Pricing to Market of German Exporters: Evidence from Panel Data," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 27(1), pages 21-46, March.
    17. Manitra A. Rakotoarisoa, 2023. "Fixed costs, market power and revenue shares of the asymmetric firms," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-34, March.
    18. Gullstrand, Joakim & Olofsdotter, Karin & Thede, Susanna, 2011. "Markups and export pricing," Working Papers 2011:37, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    19. Kory Kroft & Yao Luo & Magne Mogstad & Bradley Setzler, 2025. "Imperfect Competition and Rents in Labor and Product Markets: The Case of the Construction Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(9), pages 2926-2969, September.
    20. Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Glauben, Thomas, "undated". "Russian food and agricultural import ban: The impact on the domestic market for cattle, pork and poultry," IAMO Discussion Papers 269555, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:7:p:203-:d:1701682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.