IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v11y2023i9p236-d1239334.html

Assessing the Effect of Joining the World Trade Organization on Trade Performance: A Study of CIS Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Mereke Tanaguzova

    (SDSN Kazakhstan, Graduate School of Public Policy, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Simeon Nanovsky

    (Graduate School of Public Policy, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Serik Orazgaliyev

    (Graduate School of Public Policy, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This research delves into the impact of World Trade Organization (WTO) membership on trade dynamics in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) region, focusing on the potential augmentation or diversion of trade resulting from CIS countries’ WTO accession. The study context is grounded in the interplay between regionalism, represented by regional trade agreements and historical connections, and global integration facilitated by WTO membership. The study also scrutinizes the potentially complicating role of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) regional bloc, referencing the ‘Spaghetti Bowl’ phenomenon of overlapping trade agreements. The gravity model of trade serves as a conceptual foundation to understand the effects of WTO membership and regional trade agreements on trade costs. Empirical results suggest that WTO membership has not enhanced trade for the CIS. Instances of trade within the CIS region where there is only one WTO member have resulted in a positive trend, even though there is no robust evidence that it is due to WTO membership. The EAEU enhances trade and serves as a trading bloc within the region. This study highlights that while the WTO strives to foster trade liberalization and growth, its effects can be region-specific and complex, as demonstrated by the CIS region’s experience. The research also hints at the importance of intra-regional trade and unique regional factors as critical determinants of trade patterns, which can enhance broader trade expansion and economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mereke Tanaguzova & Simeon Nanovsky & Serik Orazgaliyev, 2023. "Assessing the Effect of Joining the World Trade Organization on Trade Performance: A Study of CIS Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:9:p:236-:d:1239334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/9/236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/9/236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "What Do Trade Agreements Really Do?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 73-90, Spring.
    2. Michael Roberts & Peter Wehrheim, 2001. "Regional trade agreements and WTO accession of CIS countries," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 36(6), pages 315-323, November.
    3. Khakimov, Parviz, 2013. "The Impact of WTO Accession Growth on Agricultural Sector of Tajikistan," International Conference and Young Researchers Forum - Natural Resource Use in Central Asia: Institutional Challenges and the Contribution of Capacity Building 189910, University of Giessen (JLU Giessen), Center for International Development and Environmental Research.
    4. Tang, Man-Keung & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2009. "The value of making commitments externally: Evidence from WTO accessions," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 216-229, July.
    5. Gunnella, Vanessa & Quaglietti, Lucia, 2019. "The economic implications of rising protectionism: a euro area and global perspective," Economic Bulletin Articles, European Central Bank, vol. 3.
    6. Jose Jaime Baena-Rojas & Susana Herrero-Olarte, 2020. "From Preferential Trade Arrangements to Free Trade Agreements: One of the Downturns of Cooperation in International Relations?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Falkowski Krzysztof, 2017. "Long-Term Comparative Advantages of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States in International Trade," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 53(4), pages 27-49, December.
    8. Christopher A. Hartwell, 2016. "Improving competitiveness in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union: a blueprint for the next decade," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 49-71, January.
    9. Aliyev, Khatai, 2014. "Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 55096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Chase, Kerry A., 2003. "Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(1), pages 137-174, January.
    11. Mirzosaid Sultonov, 2022. "Regional Economic and Financial Interconnectedness and the Impact of Sanctions: The Case of the Commonwealth of Independent States," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Turakulov, Valijon, 2020. "Trade Policy Issues of Oil-rich but Land-locked Country Case: Focusing on Kazakhstan post-WTO entry," Conference papers 333223, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Jagdish Bhagwati, 1992. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 535-556, September.
    14. Simeon Nanovsky, 2019. "The impact of oil prices on trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 431-447, February.
    15. V. A. Salnikov & D. I. Galimov & A. A. Gnidchenko, 2018. "Using Input−Output Tables for Analyzing and Forecasting the Sectoral Structure of Russian Economy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 645-653, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Percy David Maldonado-Cueva & Víctor Hugo Fernández-Bedoya, 2025. "Political and Trade Dynamics of the Pacific Alliance: Challenges and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Davit Hakhverdyan & Ruzanna Tadevosyan & Anna Pakhlyan & Svetlana Ratner, 2025. "The Impact of Eurasian Economic Union Membership on Mutual Trade in Services: What Are the Challenges for Small Economies?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Sergey V. Ryazantsev & Mukhiddin B. Kalonov & Inna V. Andronova, 2024. "SAP-LAP Model of Change Management of Labour and Educational Migration for the Sustainable Development of the High-Tech Economy of Russia and Other CIS Countries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(1), pages 49-59, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:awd:intstu:v:18:y:2018:i:1-2:p:49-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Xing Yao & Yongzhong Zhang & Rizwana Yasmeen & Zhen Cai, 2021. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Leonardo Baccini & Arianna Bondi & Matteo Fiorini, 2023. "Global Value Chains and the Design of Trade Agreements," RSCAS Working Papers 2013_56, European University Institute.
    4. Cheong, Inkyo & Turakulov, Valijon, 2021. "How Central Asia to escape from trade isolation? Policy Targeted Scenarios by CGE Modeling," Conference papers 333251, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Michael Blanga-Gubbay & Paola Conconi & Mathieu Parenti, 2020. "Globalization for Sale," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/25, European University Institute.
    6. Sanjeev Vasudevan & M. Suresh Babu, 2021. "Global production sharing and trade effects: an analysis of Eurasian Economic Union," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 633-665, December.
    7. Arianna Bondi & Leonardo Baccini & Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman & Carlo Altomonte & Italo Colantone, 2026. "Global value chains and the design of trade agreements," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 203-235, March.
    8. Celbis, Mehmet Guney & Wong, Pui-hang & Guznajeva, Tatjana, 2018. "The Eurasian customs union and the economic geography of Belarus: A panel convergence approach," MERIT Working Papers 2018-029, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Baccini, Leonardo & Fiorini, Matteo & Hoekman, Bernard & Altomonte, Carlo & Colantone, Italo, 2021. "Global value chains and deep integration," CEPR Press Book Chapters, in: Ruta, Michele & Rocha, Nadia & Fernandes, Ana Margarida (ed.), The Economics of Deep Trade Agreements, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    10. Lisandra Flach & Fabian Gräf, 2020. "The impact of trade agreements on world export prices," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 168-208, February.
    11. Amelie Guillin & Isabelle Rabaud & Chahir Zaki, 2023. "Does the depth of trade agreements matter for trade in services?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3616-3653, December.
    12. Olney, William W., 2020. "Cabotage sabotage? The curious case of the Jones Act," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Siebert, Horst, 2005. "TAFTA - a dead horse or an attractive open club?," Kiel Working Papers 1240, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    14. Giovanni Maggi & Ralph Ossa, 2020. "Are Trade Agreements Good For You?," NBER Working Papers 27252, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Kari Irwin Otteburn, 2023. "All in favour? Indian business interests and the India-EU FTA," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 311-329, September.
    16. Hippolyte Fofack & Andrew Mold, 2021. "The AfCFTA and African Trade—An Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Marette Stéphan, 2018. "Illegitimate or Legitimate Non-Tariff Measures," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Austria, Myrna S., 2003. "East Asian Regional Cooperation: Approaches and Processes," Discussion Papers DP 2003-02, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    19. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8529 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Rana, Arslan Tariq & Kebewar, Mazen, 2014. "The Political Economy of FDI flows into Developing Countries: Does the depth of International Trade Agreements Matter?," EconStor Preprints 91501, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    21. Popescu Raluca Maria, 2021. "European Union vs. Eurasian Union – a brief comparative analysis and perspectives for cooperation," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1294-1304, December.
    22. Yuting Gao, 2022. "Lobbying for Trade Liberalization and its Policy Influence," CAEPR Working Papers 2022-006 Classification-D, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:11:y:2023:i:9:p:236-:d:1239334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.