IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p388-d1311572.html

European Union Tools for the Sustainable Development of Border Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Florentina Chirodea

    (Department of International Relations and European Studies, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Luminita Soproni

    (Department of International Relations and European Studies, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Mihai Marian

    (Psychology Department, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The European Union uses several instruments aimed at reducing disparities between regions and strengthening their competitiveness and sustainability. The border regions have a special relevance, given their position and characteristics, as well as the challenges faced by local actors. The European Commission has introduced the action “b-solutions” to tackle the specific border obstacles along European Union internal borders. The article aims to analyze the integration mechanisms at the micro-regional level, which is considered as a viable and sustainable solution for cross-border regions with resources which can be exploited to attract investment and generate wealth and well-being. The qualitative analysis method involved consulting thematic publications of the b-solution program and extracting data from the presentation sheets of accepted proposals published by the Association of European Border Regions. The collected data were processed according to criteria such as direction of action, types and causes of obstacles, solutions proposed by experts, etc. Addressing the legal and administrative obstacles that hamper cross-border flows proved to be a good initiative, with 120 cases selected. The solutions offered to the particular cases can also be replicated for other obstacles identified at the European Union’s internal borders so that cooperation between border regions is intensified to the benefit of increasing European territorial, economic, and social cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Florentina Chirodea & Luminita Soproni & Mihai Marian, 2023. "European Union Tools for the Sustainable Development of Border Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:388-:d:1311572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Capello & Ugo Fratesi & Laura Resmini, 2011. "Globalization and Regional Growth in Europe," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-19251-7.
    2. Paul R. Krugman, 1991. "The move toward free trade zones," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 7-58.
    3. Jagdish Bhagwati, 1992. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 535-556, September.
    4. Vanhoonacker, Sophie and Christine Neuhold, 2015. "Dynamics of institutional cooperation in the European Union: Dimensions and effects. An Introduction," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baharumshah, Ahmad Zubaidi & Onwuka, Kevin Odulukwe & Habibullah, Muzafar Shah, 2007. "Is a regional trade bloc a prelude to multilateral trade liberalization?: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN-5 economies," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 384-402, April.
    2. Siebert, Horst, 2005. "TAFTA - a dead horse or an attractive open club?," Kiel Working Papers 1240, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    3. Austria, Myrna S., 2003. "East Asian Regional Cooperation: Approaches and Processes," Discussion Papers DP 2003-02, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    4. Parul Bajaj & Anuj Sharma, 2022. "Factors Determining Utilization of Free Trade Agreements by Indian Textile and Clothing Companies: A Conceptual Framework Model," Paradigm, , vol. 26(1), pages 70-88, June.
    5. Julián Tole Martínez, 2019. "Colombia entre los TLC y la OMC: ¿liberación o administración del comercio internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1139.
    6. Zissimos, Ben, "undated". "Why Are Trade Agreements Regional? A Theory based on Noncooperative Networks," Economic Research Papers 269465, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    7. Panagariya, A., 1997. "Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 471-489, December.
    8. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2017. "Modeling Regional Growth between Competitiveness and Austerity Measures," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(1), pages 38-74, January.
    9. Jagdambe, Subhash & Kannan, Elumalai, 2020. "Effects of ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement on agricultural trade: The gravity model approach," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    10. Christine Mayrhuber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein, 2018. "Dimensionen plattformbasierter Arbeit in Österreich und Europa. Implikationen für die soziale Sicherheit," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61667.
    11. Bagwell, Kyle & Staiger, Robert W, 1997. "Multilateral Tariff Cooperation during the Formation of Free Trade Areas," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 38(2), pages 291-319, May.
    12. Christine Mayrhuber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein, 2018. "Digitalisierung und soziale Sicherheit," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 91(12), pages 891-897, December.
    13. Valenzuela, Ernesto & Hertel, Thomas W., 2006. "Trade Reforms and Poverty: Are the Impacts Discernable?," Conference papers 331527, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Federico Benassi & Marica D'Elia & Francesca Petrei, 2021. "The “meso” dimension of territorial capital: Evidence from Italy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 159-175, February.
    15. Perez-Restrepo, Camilo & Roldan-Perez, Adriana, 2016. "Is the Pacific Alliance a Potential Pathway to the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific?," Philippine Journal of Development PJD 2014-2015 Vol. 41-42 , Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    16. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," CEPR Discussion Papers 1525, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Branko Milanović, 2001. "Nations, Conglomerates and Empires: Trade-off Between Income and Sovereignty," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Dominick Salvatore & Marjan Svetličič & Jože P. Damijan (ed.), Small Countries in a Global Economy, chapter 1, pages 25-69, Palgrave Macmillan.
    18. Anne O. Krueger, 1999. "Are Preferential Trading Arrangements Trade-Liberalizing or Protectionist?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 105-124, Fall.
    19. Pawlak, Karolina, 2013. "The development and significance of foreign trade in agri-food products in selected preferential trade agreements," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 13(28), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Kowalski, Przemyslaw, 2008. "Understanding BRIICS’ trade performance: analysis of unobserved heterogeneity in the gravity model of international trade," Conference papers 331690, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:388-:d:1311572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.