IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Chance Governs All: The Fragmented, Frustating State Of Agricultural Trade Policy In The United States

Listed author(s):
  • Browne, William P.
  • Schweikhardt, David B.
  • Bonnen, James T.

The U.S. agricultural policy process is marked by a proliferation of organized interests and rising transaction costs. These pose a barrier for countries negotiating with the United States on trade issues. This paper examines the causes of this proliferation of interests, the impact of this proliferation on trade policy decisions, and the consequences of these escalating transaction costs for countries negotiating with the United States. The results suggest that other countries must anticipate that the U.S. position in trade negotiations will be the result of an accommodation of conflicting interests and that any agreement will pass Congress only if it contains gains for U.S. export industries.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics in its series Staff Papers with number 11769.

in new window

Date of creation: 2000
Handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11769
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Justin S. Morrill Hall of Agriculture, 446 West Circle Dr., Rm 202, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039

Phone: (517) 355-4563
Fax: (517) 432-1800
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Deardorff, A.V. & Stern, R., 1997. "An Overview of the Modelling of the Choices and Consequences of U.S. Trade Policy," Working Papers 400, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
  2. David Orden, 1996. "Agricultural Interest Groups and the North American Free Trade Agreement," NBER Chapters,in: The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, pages 335-384 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  3. Paul R. Krugman, 1991. "The move toward free trade zones," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 7-58.
  4. Anne Krueger, 1995. "American Trade Policy: A Tragedy in the Making," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 53526.
  5. Charles K. Rowley & Willem Thorbecke & Richard E. Wagner, 1995. "Trade Protection In The United States," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 388.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.