IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v7y2025i3p70-d1723137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Environmental Sustainability of Food-Contact Polypropylene Packaging Production

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Pietro Damiano Baltrocchi

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via O. Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy
    Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Via Valleggio 11, I-22100 Como, Italy)

  • Francesco Romagnoli

    (Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Āzenes iela 12/1, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Marco Carnevale Miino

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via O. Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Torretta

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via O. Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy)

Abstract

Most types of packaging that are in contact with food are made of polypropylene (PP), and the environmental impacts of their production and use are still high. Currently, incorporating recycled PP in the food industry is not a viable solution for reducing environmental impacts due to its complexity and high costs. For this reason, understanding how to reduce the environmental impacts derived from the production process of plastic food packaging is essential. This study aims to analyze the environmental performance of the production of single-use PP food-contact packaging using the Life Cycle Assessment approach in order to estimate the effectiveness of proposed solutions to mitigate its impacts. Furthermore, the economic savings from the avoided CO 2 emissions were estimated. To achieve these goals, three diverse scenarios with different energy source mixes were studied. The analysis was carried out using SimaPro v9.5 software, the Ecoinvent v3.8 database, and a ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment. The findings show that upstream processes are the main contributors to the environmental profile, with 67% of the total impact, followed by core processes, with 32% of the total impacts. An increase in the use of renewable energy can lead to environmental benefits, with an impact reduction ranging from 13% to 61% depending on the energy source mix. Furthermore, up to EUR 12,458 per 100 tons of units produced was saved due to the lack of CO 2 emissions. The results of this research will be useful to encourage the use of renewable energy in the processes of PP packaging production as an alternative when polymer replacement is difficult.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Pietro Damiano Baltrocchi & Francesco Romagnoli & Marco Carnevale Miino & Vincenzo Torretta, 2025. "Improving Environmental Sustainability of Food-Contact Polypropylene Packaging Production," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:70-:d:1723137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/70/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Maga & Markus Hiebel & Venkat Aryan, 2019. "A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Meat Trays Made of Various Packaging Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Kevin Rennert & Frank Errickson & Brian C. Prest & Lisa Rennels & Richard G. Newell & William Pizer & Cora Kingdon & Jordan Wingenroth & Roger Cooke & Bryan Parthum & David Smith & Kevin Cromar & Dela, 2022. "Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 687-692, October.
    3. Macarena Beltran & Benny Tjahjono & Anna Bogush & Jorge Julião & Evandro L. S. Teixeira, 2021. "Food Plastic Packaging Transition towards Circular Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Miguel Vigil & Maria Pedrosa-Laza & JV Alvarez Cabal & Francisco Ortega-Fernández, 2020. "Sustainability Analysis of Active Packaging for the Fresh Cut Vegetable Industry by Means of Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Alexander Alexandrovich Golub & Marek Hanusch & Bardal,Diogo & Bruce Ian Keith & Daniel Navia Simon & Cornelius Fleischhaker, 2025. "Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11114, The World Bank.
    4. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Tarsia, Romano, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of weather shocks on firm economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Beaulieu, Jake & Kopits, Elizabeth & Moore, Chris C. & Parthum, Bryan M., 2024. "The Climate Benefits of Improving Water Quality," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 348911, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    7. Markéta Šerešová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Proposal of Package-to-Product Indicator for Carbon Footprint Assessment with Focus on the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Joyce Wang & Shiladitya DasSarma, 2024. "Contributions of Medical Greenhouse Gases to Climate Change and Their Possible Alternatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Jomo Kwame Sundaram, 2024. "Climate Taxation Distraction Accelerating Global Warming," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 67(1), pages 114-122, June.
    10. Hashemi, Majid & Jenkins, Glenn & Milne, Frank, 2024. "Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 276-301, July.
    11. Davis G. Nelson & Elena A. Mikhailova & Hamdi A. Zurqani & Lili Lin & Zhenbang Hao & Christopher J. Post & Mark A. Schlautman & George B. Shepherd, 2024. "Soil-Based Emissions and Context-Specific Climate Change Planning to Support the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) on Climate Action: A Case Study of Georgia (USA)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Weiwei Xiong & Katsumasa Tanaka & Philippe Ciais & Daniel J. A. Johansson & Mariliis Lehtveer, 2022. "emIAM v1.0: an emulator for Integrated Assessment Models using marginal abatement cost curves," Papers 2212.12060, arXiv.org.
    13. David Suárez‐Cuesta & Maria C. Latorre & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2024. "A policy and quantitative analysis of U.S. climate policy from a global perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S7), pages 21-33, November.
    14. Vladimir Kurdyukov, 2025. "Assessment of Economic Damage to the Ecosystem from Pollutant Emissions During the Transition of the Territory to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-30, August.
    15. Gössling, Stefan & Kees, Jessica & Litman, Todd & Humpe, Andreas, 2023. "The economic cost of a 130 kph speed limit in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    16. Johannes Gessner & Andreas Gerster & Michael Kramm, 2025. "The Alignment Effect of Auditing," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_696, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    17. Wozny, Florian, 2024. "Tax Incidence in Heterogeneous Markets: The Pass-through of Air Passenger Taxes on Airfares," IZA Discussion Papers 16783, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Li, Yangyang, 2024. "Effects and mechanisms of intelligent electricity system on urban carbon reduction," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Yang, Zhixue & Li, Hui & Zhang, Hongcai, 2025. "A power-to-methanol-based chemical industry system-aided decarbonization approach for power distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    20. Thomas Akintayo & Juha Hämäläinen & Pertti Pasanen & Iniobong John, 2023. "A Rapid Review of Sociocultural Dimensions in Nigeria’s Solid Waste Management Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:70-:d:1723137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.