IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v7y2025i3p70-d1723137.html

Improving Environmental Sustainability of Food-Contact Polypropylene Packaging Production

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Pietro Damiano Baltrocchi

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via O. Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy
    Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Via Valleggio 11, I-22100 Como, Italy)

  • Francesco Romagnoli

    (Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Āzenes iela 12/1, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Marco Carnevale Miino

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via O. Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Torretta

    (Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via O. Rossi 9, I-21100 Varese, Italy)

Abstract

Most types of packaging that are in contact with food are made of polypropylene (PP), and the environmental impacts of their production and use are still high. Currently, incorporating recycled PP in the food industry is not a viable solution for reducing environmental impacts due to its complexity and high costs. For this reason, understanding how to reduce the environmental impacts derived from the production process of plastic food packaging is essential. This study aims to analyze the environmental performance of the production of single-use PP food-contact packaging using the Life Cycle Assessment approach in order to estimate the effectiveness of proposed solutions to mitigate its impacts. Furthermore, the economic savings from the avoided CO 2 emissions were estimated. To achieve these goals, three diverse scenarios with different energy source mixes were studied. The analysis was carried out using SimaPro v9.5 software, the Ecoinvent v3.8 database, and a ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment. The findings show that upstream processes are the main contributors to the environmental profile, with 67% of the total impact, followed by core processes, with 32% of the total impacts. An increase in the use of renewable energy can lead to environmental benefits, with an impact reduction ranging from 13% to 61% depending on the energy source mix. Furthermore, up to EUR 12,458 per 100 tons of units produced was saved due to the lack of CO 2 emissions. The results of this research will be useful to encourage the use of renewable energy in the processes of PP packaging production as an alternative when polymer replacement is difficult.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Pietro Damiano Baltrocchi & Francesco Romagnoli & Marco Carnevale Miino & Vincenzo Torretta, 2025. "Improving Environmental Sustainability of Food-Contact Polypropylene Packaging Production," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:70-:d:1723137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/70/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/7/3/70/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macarena Beltran & Benny Tjahjono & Anna Bogush & Jorge Julião & Evandro L. S. Teixeira, 2021. "Food Plastic Packaging Transition towards Circular Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Daniel Maga & Markus Hiebel & Venkat Aryan, 2019. "A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Meat Trays Made of Various Packaging Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Kevin Rennert & Frank Errickson & Brian C. Prest & Lisa Rennels & Richard G. Newell & William Pizer & Cora Kingdon & Jordan Wingenroth & Roger Cooke & Bryan Parthum & David Smith & Kevin Cromar & Dela, 2022. "Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 687-692, October.
    4. Miguel Vigil & Maria Pedrosa-Laza & JV Alvarez Cabal & Francisco Ortega-Fernández, 2020. "Sustainability Analysis of Active Packaging for the Fresh Cut Vegetable Industry by Means of Attributional & Consequential Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Alexander Alexandrovich Golub & Marek Hanusch & Bardal,Diogo & Bruce Ian Keith & Daniel Navia Simon & Cornelius Fleischhaker, 2025. "Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11114, The World Bank.
    4. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Tracey Osborne & Sylvia Cifuentes & Laura Dev & Seánna Howard & Elisa Marchi & Lauren Withey & Marcelo Santos Rocha da Silva, 2024. "Climate justice, forests, and Indigenous Peoples: toward an alternative to REDD + for the Amazon," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(8), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Christina Tsouti & Christina Papadaskalopoulou & Angeliki Konsta & Panagiotis Andrikopoulos & Margarita Panagiotopoulou & Sofia Papadaki & Christos Boukouvalas & Magdalini Krokida & Katerina Valta, 2023. "Investigating the Environmental Benefits of Novel Films for the Packaging of Fresh Tomatoes Enriched with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compounds through Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Aggarwal, Raavi & Missbach, Leonard & Somanathan, E. & Steckel, Jan Christoph & Sterner, Thomas, 2025. "Negative health effects of carbon prices can outweigh the climate benefits in developing countries," EfD Discussion Paper 25-9, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    8. Schleich, Joachim & Alsheimer, Sven, 2024. "The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5 °C," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Zezhong Zhao & Yajuan Li & Zhiyang Du, 2022. "Seafood Waste-Based Materials for Sustainable Food Packing: From Waste to Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Tarsia, Romano, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of weather shocks on firm economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Azizbek Kamolov & Zafar Turakulov & Patrik Furda & Miroslav Variny & Adham Norkobilov & Marcos Fallanza, 2024. "Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture in an NGCC Power Plant in Uzbekistan," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-32, October.
    12. John Bistline & Geoffrey Blanford & Maxwell Brown & Dallas Burtraw & Maya Domeshek & Jamil Farbes & Allen Fawcett & Anne Hamilton & Jesse Jenkins & Ryan Jones & Ben King & Hannah Kolus & John Larsen &, 2023. "Emissions and Energy Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act," Papers 2307.01443, arXiv.org.
    13. Giovanni Felici & Giulio Corsi & Serena Fabbri & Monia Niero & Maria Cristina Lavagnolo, 2025. "Assessing the Value of Ecosystem Services in Decentralized Sanitation Systems: A Case Study in a Vulnerable Mountain Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Inderst, Roman & Opp, Marcus M., 2025. "Sustainable finance versus environmental policy: Does greenwashing justify a taxonomy for sustainable investments?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    15. Alessia Camplomi & Harald Fadinger & Chiara Forlati & Sabine Stillger & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2024. "Designing Effective Carbon Border Adjustment with Minimal Information Requirements: Theory and Evidence," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_495v3, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Jul 2025.
    16. Beaulieu, Jake & Kopits, Elizabeth & Moore, Chris C. & Parthum, Bryan M., 2024. "The Climate Benefits of Improving Water Quality," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 348911, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    17. Castellini, Marta & Castelli, Chiara & Gusperti, Camilla & Lupi, Veronica & Vergalli, Sergio, 2025. "Balancing climate policies and economic development in the Mediterranean countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    18. Taşcıkaraoğlu, Akın & Beyazıt, Muhammed Ali & Kleissl, Jan & Shi, Yuanyuan, 2025. "Coordinated Management of Mobile Charging Stations and Community Energy Storage for Electric Vehicle Charging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    19. Markéta Šerešová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Proposal of Package-to-Product Indicator for Carbon Footprint Assessment with Focus on the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Joyce Wang & Shiladitya DasSarma, 2024. "Contributions of Medical Greenhouse Gases to Climate Change and Their Possible Alternatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:7:y:2025:i:3:p:70-:d:1723137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.