IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i8p876-d1636608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Defines the Perfect Wine Tourism Experience? Evidence from a Best–Worst Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Caterina Fucile Franceschini

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre for Research in Viticulture and Oenology (CIRVE), University of Padova, 31015 Conegliano, Italy)

  • Elisa Giampietri

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre for Research in Viticulture and Oenology (CIRVE), University of Padova, 31015 Conegliano, Italy
    Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Eugenio Pomarici

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
    Interdepartmental Centre for Research in Viticulture and Oenology (CIRVE), University of Padova, 31015 Conegliano, Italy)

Abstract

This paper investigates wine tourists’ preferences for the attributes of the wine tourism experience (WTEXP) in Italy and Turkey, exploring cross-cultural differences and similarities in two countries with diverse wine tourism development. Data were collected through an online survey of 253 wine consumers, and the Best–Worst Scaling method was employed in both countries to assess the perceived importance of selected WTEXP attributes that influence tourists’ choices. The samples were then segmented using cluster analysis based on key attitudinal scales (e.g., wine involvement), with BWS applied to each segment to further examine visitor preferences. The results show that both Italian and Turkish wine tourists prioritized expert-led tours but differed in other preferences. Italian tourists valued the winery’s aesthetic appeal, while Turkish tourists favored pre-visit informative sessions. Additionally, Italians placed less importance on accompanying events, while Turks considered the reputation of the wine, winery, or wine region the least significant factor. These preferences also varied within the clusters identified in each sample. This research represents the first comparison of consumer preferences in wine tourism between Turkey, a developing market, and Italy, a traditional Old World wine producer, while considering the diversity within each group. The findings provide key insights for wine tourism stakeholders, such as wineries and tourism managers, offering actionable recommendations to tailor their offerings for specific tourist segments to attract a larger number of wine tourists, enhance their experience, and foster sustainable growth of wine tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Caterina Fucile Franceschini & Elisa Giampietri & Eugenio Pomarici, 2025. "What Defines the Perfect Wine Tourism Experience? Evidence from a Best–Worst Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:876-:d:1636608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/8/876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/8/876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Serra & Nuno Antonio & Claudia Henriques & Carlos M. Afonso, 2021. "Promoting Sustainability through Regional Food and Wine Pairing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Marcello Stanco & Marco Lerro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2020. "Consumers’ Preferences for Wine Attributes: A Best-Worst Scaling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Mittal, Banwari & Lee, Myung-Soo, 1989. "A causal model of consumer involvement," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 363-389, November.
    4. Alvaro Dias & Bruno Sousa & Vasco Santos & Paulo Ramos & Arlindo Madeira, 2023. "Wine Tourism and Sustainability Awareness: A Consumer Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Mariana Carvalho & Elisabeth Kastenholz & Maria João Carneiro, 2021. "Pairing Co-Creation with Food and Wine Experiences—A Holistic Perspective of Tourist Experiences in Dão, a Portuguese Wine Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Marta Maria Montella, 2017. "Wine Tourism and Sustainability: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Kastenholz & Diana Cunha & Ainhize Eletxigerra & Mariana Carvalho & Isabel Silva, 2022. "The Experience Economy in a Wine Destination—Analysing Visitor Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Fatheia Ibrahim & Serdal Işiktaş & Ayşem Çelebi, 2025. "Strategic Customer Insights: Leveraging Online Reviews for Service Enhancement in Wine Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Claire Lamoureux & Nindu Barbier & Tatiana Bouzdine-Chameeva, 2022. "Managing Wine Tourism and Biodiversity: The Art of Ambidexterity for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    5. Sara Sousa & Elisabete Correia & Clara Viseu, 2024. "Exploring Portuguese Consumers’ Behavior Regarding Sustainable Wine: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Andreea-Ionela Puiu & Anca Monica Ardeleanu & Camelia Cojocaru & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Exploring the Effect of Status Quo, Innovativeness, and Involvement Tendencies on Luxury Fashion Innovations: The Mediation Role of Status Consumption," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.
    8. Lokesh Jasrai, 2014. "Measuring Mobile Telecom Service Innovativeness Among Youth," Paradigm, , vol. 18(1), pages 103-116, June.
    9. Eigenraam, Anniek W. & Eelen, Jiska & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2021. "Let Me Entertain You? The Importance of Authenticity in Online Customer Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    10. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    11. Rafaela Matavelli & Saul Jesus & Patrícia Pinto & João Viseu, 2020. "Social support as a moderator of the relationship between financial threat and life satisfaction," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(1), pages 16-28.
    12. Gonzalo Díaz-Meneses & Maica Amador-Marrero, 2023. "The Experiential Wine Tourist’s Model: The Case of Gran Canaria Wine Cellar Establishments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Azucena Gracia & Miguel I. Gómez, 2020. "Food Sustainability and Waste Reduction in Spain: Consumer Preferences for Local, Suboptimal, And/Or Unwashed Fresh Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Jerzy Leszkowicz-Baczyński, 2020. "Winemaking And Wine Tourism In Lubuskie As A Strategy For Local Revitalisation," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(2), pages 79-91.
    15. Andreas Strebinger & Horst Treiblmaier, 2022. "Profiling early adopters of blockchain-based hotel booking applications: demographic, psychographic, and service-related factors," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica & Stangherlin, Isadora Do Carmo, 2021. "Upcycled by-product use in agri-food systems from a consumer perspective: A review of what we know, and what is missing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Will “no-ownership†work for apparel?: Implications for apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 66-73.
    18. Nicolau, Juan Luis, 2011. "El efecto de la participación en actividades de ocio sobre la influencia de la distancia en la elección de destinos/When the Enrollment in Recreational Activities Changes Distance Sensitivity to Desti," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 803-824, Diciembre.
    19. Lee, Kuan-Huei & Scott, Noel & Packer, Jan, 2014. "Habitus and food lifestyle: In-destination activity participation of Slow Food members," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 207-220.
    20. Kimaro, Nice & Timothy, Shauri & Mgale, Yohana James, 2024. "Exploring Consumer Preferences for Locally Produced Wine in the Tanzanian Market: Evidence from Wine Consumers in Dodoma City," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(01), February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:876-:d:1636608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.