IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i7p782-d1628135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergistic Reduction and Common Driving Forces of Agricultural Pollution and Carbon Emissions Based on Agricultural Grey Water Footprint

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Zhu

    (School of Geomatics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Qing Zhang

    (School of Geomatics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Junfeng Xiong

    (State Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China)

Abstract

Managing agricultural water pollution (AWP) and agricultural carbon emissions (ACE) together is crucial for addressing the global water resources crisis and climate challenges. Traditional water quality indicators are limited in large-scale evaluations of AWP. The common trends of ACE and AWP, as well as the spatial heterogeneity of their common driving factors also remain unclear. This study introduces a novel framework for analyzing the synergistic reduction of AWP and ACE from the perspective of agricultural grey water footprint (AGWF) and examines disparities in common driving factors across areas with differing levels of economic development and pollution intensities in Zhejiang Province. The results indicate that ACE and AGWF in Zhejiang showed an upward trend from 2010 to 2012, followed by a significant decline from 2013 to 2020. A consistent synergistic reduction trend in grey water footprint and carbon emissions was identified in both the planting and livestock husbandry sectors across Zhejiang. Socio-economic factors jointly influenced the reductions in ACE and AGWF, with technological level and the labor-to-research-and-development (labor-R&D) ratio being the primary drivers, accounting for 79.41% and 78.38% of these reductions, respectively. The impact of agricultural R&D expenditure intensity on AGWF and ACE exhibited spatiotemporal heterogeneity and sectoral disparities. The key to promoting the synergistic reduction of AGWF and ACE lies in advancing the research, development, and application of green agricultural technologies especially in regions where such technologies are not yet fully developed. The results provide a theoretical framework and practical implementation for the integrated management of AWP and ACE, as well as sustainable agricultural policy formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Zhu & Qing Zhang & Junfeng Xiong, 2025. "Synergistic Reduction and Common Driving Forces of Agricultural Pollution and Carbon Emissions Based on Agricultural Grey Water Footprint," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:782-:d:1628135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sorrell, Steve, 2009. "Jevons' Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1456-1469, April.
    2. Ang, B. W., 2004. "Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1131-1139, June.
    3. Ang, B. W., 2005. "The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 867-871, May.
    4. Chapagain, A.K. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & Savenije, H.H.G. & Gautam, R., 2006. "The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 186-203, November.
    5. Guanghe Han & Jiahui Xu & Xin Zhang & Xin Pan, 2024. "Efficiency and Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Study in Chinese State Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Nan, 2021. "Decomposition of energy intensity in Chinese industries using an extended LMDI method of production element endowment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Yue Yuan & Xiaoyang Guo & Yang Shen, 2024. "Digitalization Drives the Green Transformation of Agriculture-Related Enterprises: A Case Study of A-Share Agriculture-Related Listed Companies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yousaf Raza, Muhammad & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Development trend of Pakistan's natural gas consumption: A sectorial decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Hammond, G.P. & Norman, J.B., 2012. "Decomposition analysis of energy-related carbon emissions from UK manufacturing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 220-227.
    3. Zhang, Shulin & Su, Xiaoling & Singh, Vijay P & Ayantobo, Olusola Olaitan & Xie, Juan, 2018. "Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis of changes in agricultural water use: a case study of the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 422-430.
    4. Lu, I.J. & Lin, Sue J. & Lewis, Charles, 2007. "Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3226-3235, June.
    5. Trotta, Gianluca, 2020. "Assessing energy efficiency improvements and related energy security and climate benefits in Finland: An ex post multi-sectoral decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. de Freitas, Luciano Charlita & Kaneko, Shinji, 2011. "Decomposition of CO2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: Challenges and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1495-1504, March.
    7. Shengling Lin & Yi Zou & Yanhu He & Shiyu Xue & Lirong Zhu & Changqing Ye, 2025. "A Spatiotemporal Dynamic Evaluation of Soil Erosion at a Monthly Scale and the Identification of Driving Factors in Hainan Island Based on the Chinese Soil Loss Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s mining industry: Evidence and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-87.
    9. Román-Collado, Rocío & Colinet, María José, 2018. "Are labour productivity and residential living standards drivers of the energy consumption changes?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 746-756.
    10. Mohlin, Kristina & Camuzeaux, Jonathan R. & Muller, Adrian & Schneider, Marius & Wagner, Gernot, 2018. "Factoring in the forgotten role of renewables in CO2 emission trends using decomposition analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 290-296.
    11. Zheng, Jiali & Mi, Zhifu & Coffman, D'Maris & Milcheva, Stanimira & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo & Wang, Shouyang, 2019. "Regional development and carbon emissions in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 25-36.
    12. Ang, B.W. & Goh, Tian, 2019. "Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 74-87.
    13. Ang, B.W. & Liu, Na, 2007. "Energy decomposition analysis: IEA model versus other methods," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1426-1432, March.
    14. Changfeng Shi & Hang Yuan & Qinghua Pang & Yangyang Zhang, 2020. "Research on the Decoupling of Water Resources Utilization and Agricultural Economic Development in Gansu Province from the Perspective of Water Footprint," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Xuankai Deng & Yanhua Yu & Yanfang Liu, 2015. "Effect of Construction Land Expansion on Energy-Related Carbon Emissions: Empirical Analysis of China and Its Provinces from 2001 to 2011," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Baležentis, Alvydas & Baležentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2011. "The energy intensity in Lithuania during 1995–2009: A LMDI approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7322-7334.
    17. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Jialing Zou & Weidong Liu & Zhipeng Tang, 2017. "Analysis of Factors Contributing to Changes in Energy Consumption in Tangshan City between 2007 and 2012," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Jinyun & Yang, Zhifeng & Li, Shengsheng, 2011. "Regional differences in the factors that influence China’s energy-related carbon emissions, and potential mitigation strategies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7712-7718.
    20. Manel Daldoul & Ahlem Dakhlaoui, 2018. "Using the LMDI Decomposition Approach to Analyze the Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions in Tunisian Transportation Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 22-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:782-:d:1628135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.