IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i6p599-d1610014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of Social Networks in Promoting the Green Production Behaviors of Chinese Farmers: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Geng

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Shanyao Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xibing Han

    (School of Public Administration, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

The green production practices of farmers are essential for sustainable agricultural development. However, studies have mostly overlooked the social factors affecting farmers’ decisions regarding green production behaviors (GPB). Furthermore, the pathways and mechanisms through which social networks modify these behaviors have not been fully validated. Therefore, by examining 1203 farmers from China’s main grain-producing regions, this study aims to empirically investigate both the direct and indirect impacts of social networks on farmers’ GPB, thereby furthering relevant research. First, family social networks in rural areas markedly enhanced farmer engagement in GPB. After assessing the endogeneity issues associated with farmers’ self-selection behaviors using propensity score matching, this effect was found to substantially persist. Analysis of the indirect impact revealed that social networks primarily facilitated farmers’ adoption of green production through channels such as information acquisition, interactive learning, and service support. Second, heterogeneity analyses based on generational differences and crop types demonstrated a distinct, promotional impact of social networks on both “middle-generation” and “older-generation” farmers. Moreover, a comparison between grain crop farmers and cash crop farmers determined the more substantial influence of social networks on encouraging grain crop farmer GPB. Overall, this study emphasizes that rural China’s social networks, especially clan-based ones, can successfully nurture agricultural sustainability by accelerating the propagation of green technologies while offering suitable environments for elderly farmers to “learn by observing” and “learn by doing”. Relevant departments should pay attention to and make full use of farmers’ social network relations in the process of promoting farmers’ adoption of green production behavior and further promoting the green development of agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Geng & Shanyao Wang & Xibing Han, 2025. "Efficacy of Social Networks in Promoting the Green Production Behaviors of Chinese Farmers: An Empirical Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:599-:d:1610014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheyi Zhu & Yuxin Chen & Ke Ning & Zengjin Liu, 2024. "Policy setting, heterogeneous scale, and willingness to adopt green production behavior: field evidence from cooperatives in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1529-1555, January.
    2. Chatzimichael, Konstantinos & Genius, Margarita & Tzouvelekas, Vangelis, 2014. "Informational cascades and technology adoption: Evidence from Greek and German organic growers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 186-195.
    3. Grennan, Jillian, 2019. "Dividend payments as a response to peer influence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 549-570.
    4. Charles F. Manski, 2000. "Economic Analysis of Social Interactions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 115-136, Summer.
    5. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Mark Granovetter, 2005. "The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 33-50, Winter.
    7. Zheyi Zhu & Yuxin Chen & Ke Ning & Zengjin Liu, 2024. "Correction: Policy setting, heterogeneous scale, and willingness to adopt green production behavior: field evidence from cooperatives in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1557-1557, January.
    8. Elahi, Ehsan & Abid, Muhammad & Zhang, Liqin & ul Haq, Shams & Sahito, Jam Ghulam Murtaza, 2018. "Agricultural advisory and financial services; farm level access, outreach and impact in a mixed cropping district of Punjab, Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 249-260.
    9. Menghan Zhao & Yongai Jin, 2020. "Migrant Workers in Beijing: How Hometown Ties Affect Economic Outcomes," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(5), pages 789-808, October.
    10. Yuying Liu & Ruiling Shi & Yiting Peng & Wei Wang & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "Impacts of Technology Training Provided by Agricultural Cooperatives on Farmers’ Adoption of Biopesticides in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    12. Jin Yang & Zuhui Huang & Xiaobo Zhang & Thomas Reardon, 2013. "The Rapid Rise of Cross-Regional Agricultural Mechanization Services in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1245-1251.
    13. Belton, Ben & Win, Myat Thida & Zhang, Xiaobo & Filipski, Mateusz, 2021. "The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Chowdhury, Shyamal & Satish, Varun & Sulaiman, Munshi & Sun, Yi, 2022. "Sooner rather than later: Social networks and technology adoption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 466-482.
    15. Fiona Burlig & Andrew W. Stevens, 2024. "Social networks and technology adoption: Evidence from church mergers in the U.S. Midwest," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1141-1166, May.
    16. Kondo, Ayako & Shoji, Masahiro, 2019. "Peer effects in employment status: Evidence from housing lotteries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Cheng & Nie, Kunxi & Zhu, Yueji, 2024. "Participation in land rental and labor markets and agricultural economic performance of banana farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Meng Qu & Kai Zhao & Renhui Zhang & Yuan Gao & Jing Wang, 2022. "Divergence between Willingness and Behavior of Farmers to Purchase Socialized Agricultural Services: From a Heterogeneity Perspective of Land Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Liu, Yan & Heerink, Nico & Li, Fan & Shi, Xiaoping, 2022. "Do agricultural machinery services promote village farmland rental markets? Theory and evidence from a case study in the North China plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Xuelan Li & Rui Guan, 2023. "How Does Agricultural Mechanization Service Affect Agricultural Green Transformation in China?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Ping Xue & Xinru Han & Yongchun Wang & Xiudong Wang, 2022. "Can Agricultural Machinery Harvesting Services Reduce Cropland Abandonment? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Xiang Li & Xiaoqin Guo, 2023. "Can Policy Promote Agricultural Service Outsourcing? Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Devillanova, Carlo, 2008. "Social networks, information and health care utilization: Evidence from undocumented immigrants in Milan," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 265-286, March.
    8. Ira Matuschke & Matin Qaim, 2009. "The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in India," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(5), pages 493-505, September.
    9. Toni Mora & Joan Gil, 2013. "Peer Effects In Adolescent Bmi: Evidence From Spain," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 501-516, May.
    10. Chien Chi Chu & Xiu‐Fen Su & Yu‐En Lin & Akihiro Omura & Bin Li & Adrian Wai‐Kong Cheung, 2023. "Love thy neighbour: Evidence from capital structure decisions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 2907-2933, September.
    11. Dufhues, Thomas & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Fischer, Isabel, 2006. "Social capital and rural development: literature review and current state of the art [Sozialkapital und ländliche Entwicklung: Literaturüberblick und gegenwärtiger Stand der Forschung]," IAMO Discussion Papers 96, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    12. Ning Geng & Xiaoqing Zheng & Xibing Han & Xiaonan Li, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Development: The Impact of Agricultural Productive Services on China’s Low-Carbon Agricultural Transformation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Lewei Chen & Zongyi Zhang & Hongbo Li & Xinpu Zhang, 2023. "Maintenance Skill Training Gives Agricultural Socialized Service Providers More Advantages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Armando Razo, 2020. "Social dilemmas with manifest and unknown networks," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(1), pages 3-39, February.
    15. Weihong Huang & Caiyan Yang & Ke Liu & Rui Min, 2023. "Information Acquisition Ability and Farmers’ Herd Behavior in Rice–Crayfish Coculture System Adoption," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Alwin Keil & Alwin D’souza & Andrew McDonald, 2017. "Zero-tillage is a proven technology for sustainable wheat intensification in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains: what determines farmer awareness and adoption?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(4), pages 723-743, August.
    18. repec:zbw:iamodp:92017 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bowei Li & Yanjun Qian & Fanbin Kong, 2023. "Does Outsourcing Service Reduce the Excessive Use of Chemical Fertilizers in Rural China? The Moderating Effects of Farm Size and Plot Size," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Siyu Yang & Feng Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Agricultural Machinery Socialization Services on the Scale of Land Operation: Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    21. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firm's equality policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 385-405, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:599-:d:1610014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.