IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i10p1055-d1654860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese Farmers’ Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Adoption Behavior and Its Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Liqun Zhu

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China
    College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yutao Wang

    (College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yujia Liu

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Zhuqun Tan

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Siqi Ke

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Naijuan Hu

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanjing 210014, China)

  • Shuyang Qu

    (Department of Agricultural Education and Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Guang Han

    (College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China
    China Resources and Environment and Development Academy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

Low-carbon agricultural technology (LCAT) is essential for China to achieve its carbon emissions peak by 2030 and neutrality by 2060. Farmers’ adoption of LCAT is crucial for adapting to and mitigating climate change risks. This study explores the social-psychological factors shaping farmers’ LCAT adoption behavior, utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Normative Activation Model. Survey data from 360 farmers in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Findings show that behavioral attitude, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, and personal norms have positive and direct effects on farmers’ LCAT adoption. The analyses also discovered four mediation paths that indirectly influence farmers’ LCAT adoption, including Subjective Norms → Personal Norms → Adoption Level; Consequence Awareness → Personal Norms → Adoption Level; Responsibility Attribution → Personal Norms → Adoption Level; and Consequence Awareness → Responsibility Attribution → Personal Norms → Adoption Level. The study deepens our understanding of the social-psychological mechanism underlying farmers’ LCAT adoption behavior. The findings offer valuable insights for promoting low-carbon agricultural technologies and guiding policy development. Recommendations include promoting LCAT by leveraging social influence to enhance social norms, educating farmers on ethical environmental stewardship, raising awareness of farming’s environmental impacts, and providing policy incentives and technical support to reduce adoption barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liqun Zhu & Yutao Wang & Yujia Liu & Zhuqun Tan & Siqi Ke & Naijuan Hu & Shuyang Qu & Guang Han, 2025. "Chinese Farmers’ Low-Carbon Agricultural Technology Adoption Behavior and Its Influencing Factors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:1055-:d:1654860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/10/1055/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/10/1055/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daxini, Amar & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Barnes, Andrew & Buckley, Cathal & Daly, Karen, 2018. "Which factors influence farmers’ intentions to adopt nutrient management planning?," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273498, Agricultural Economics Society.
    2. Wang, Bo & Wang, Xiaomeng & Guo, Dongxue & Zhang, Bin & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: Egoism or altruism?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 68-77.
    3. Yang, Xin & Zhou, Xiaohe & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2022. "Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: An examination of the theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    5. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Zhaoxia Guo & Ge Wang, 2021. "Exploring the Influence Mechanism of Farmers’ Organic Fertilizer Application Behaviors Based on the Normative Activation Theory," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Goswami, Kishor & Choudhury, Hari Kanta & Saikia, Jitu, 2012. "Factors influencing farmers' adoption of slash and burn agriculture in North East India," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 146-151.
    8. Hahn, Christoffer & Lindkvist, Emma & Magnusson, Dick & Johansson, Maria, 2025. "The role of agriculture in a sustainable energy system – The farmers’ perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Ma, Jun & Gao, Huixian & Cheng, Changgao & Fang, Zhou & Zhou, Qin & Zhou, Haiwei, 2023. "What influences the behavior of farmers' participation in agricultural nonpoint source pollution control?—Evidence from a farmer survey in Huai'an, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    10. Yingjie Wang & Huachun Wang & Tian Fu, 2024. "Can social networks facilitate smallholders’ decisions to adopt climate-smart agriculture technologies? A three-level meta-analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Omulo, Godfrey & Daum, Thomas & Köller, Karlheinz & Birner, Regina, 2024. "Unpacking the behavioral intentions of ‘emergent farmers’ towards mechanized conservation agriculture in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Daxini, Amar & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Barnes, Andrew & Buckley, Cathal & Daly, Karen, 2018. "Which factors influence farmers’ intentions to adopt nutrient management planning?," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273494, Agricultural Economics Society.
    13. Siyang Zhang & Minjuan Zhao & Qi Ni & Yu Cai, 2021. "Modelling Farmers’ Watershed Ecological Protection Behaviour with the Value-Belief-Norm Theory: A Case Study of the Wei River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Okumah, Murat & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Chapman, Pippa J. & Novo, Paula & Cassidy, Rachel & Lyon, Christopher & Higgins, Alex & Doody, Donnacha, 2021. "The role of experiential learning in the adoption of best land management practices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Daniel K. Maduku & Steven Mbeya, 2024. "Understanding family takaful purchase behaviour: the roles of religious obligation and gender," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 440-458, June.
    3. Keerthi Police & Vikas Gautam & Sagar Chandakavate & Rishi Dwesar, 2024. "Modeling determinants of farmers’ purchase behavior: A case of chemical pesticides," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 9217-9245, April.
    4. Suriansyah & Nurliza & Eva Dolorosa & Rosyadi & Denah Suswati, 2024. "Intention to Transition: Natural Rubber Smallholders Navigating the Risks of Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Minglong Zhang & Yanfang Huang & Yunzheng Zhang & Fengying Nie & Xiangping Jia, 2024. "Farmers’ Adoption of Agricultural Nature-Based Solutions in Northeast China: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Li, Fuduo & Zhang, Kangjie & Ren, Jing & Yin, Changbin & Zhang, Yang & Nie, Jun, 2021. "Driving mechanism for farmers to adopt improved agricultural systems in China: The case of rice-green manure crops rotation system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Javier Martínez-Dalmau & Julio Berbel & Rafaela Ordóñez-Fernández, 2021. "Nitrogen Fertilization. A Review of the Risks Associated with the Inefficiency of Its Use and Policy Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Jing Li & Rui Jiang & Xueyu Tang, 2024. "Assessing psychological factors on farmers' intention to apply organic manure: an application of extended theory of planned behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 2467-2491, January.
    9. Murat Okumah & Ata Senior Yeboah & Elias Nkiaka & Richard Apatewen Azerigyik, 2019. "What Determines Behaviours Towards Water Resources Management in a Rural Context? Results of a Quantitative Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Shebanina, Olena & Burkovska, Anna & Petrenko, Vadym & Burkovska, Alla, 2023. "Economic planning at agricultural enterprises: Ukrainian experience of increasing the availability of data in the context of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    11. Jane Musole Kwenye & Xiaoting Hou Jones & Alan Renwick, 2023. "Understanding Land-Use Trade-off Decision Making Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process: Insights from Agricultural Land Managers in Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Daxini, Amar & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Buckley, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2018. "Factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning: accounting for heterogeneity," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276183, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Yang, Xin & Zhou, Xiaohe & Deng, Xiangzheng, 2022. "Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: An examination of the theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Alan Renwick & Robyn Dynes & Paul Johnstone & Warren King & Lania Holt & Jemma Penelope, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities for Land Use Transformation: Insights from the Central Plains Water Scheme in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Zhong, Shen & Li, Junwei & Chen, Xi & Wen, Hongmei, 2022. "A multi-hierarchy meta-frontier approach for measuring green total factor productivity: An application of pig breeding in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Lukasz Kryszak, 2024. "The impact of environmental attitudes of farmers on efficiency in the agricultural sector in the European Union," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(8), pages 383-394.
    17. Shin Yee Siaw & Munifah Siti Amira Yusuf & Tengku Halimatun Sa’adiah T Abu Bakar & Haslizah A/P Mat, 2024. "Understanding Fertigation Adoption: An Investigation into the Theory of Planned behaviour among Indigenous Communities in Perak, Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(2), pages 2133-2141, February.
    18. Tsakiridis, Andreas & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Cullen, Paula & Ó hUallacháin, Daire & Sheridan, Helen & Stout, Jane, 2022. "Examining the relationship between farmer participation in an agri-environment scheme and the quantity and quality of semi-natural habitats on Irish farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Lin, Fei & Li, Jisheng & Wu, Chen, 2025. "Social networks, environmental literacy, and farmers' clean low-carbon farming behaviors: Evidence from villages in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. José A. Aznar-Sánchez & Luis J. Belmonte-Ureña & Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz & Diego L. Valera, 2019. "Aquifer Sustainability and the Use of Desalinated Seawater for Greenhouse Irrigation in the Campo de Níjar, Southeast Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:1055-:d:1654860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.