IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i4p355-d536906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integral Assessment of Organic Fertilization on a Camelina sativa Rotation under Mediterranean Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Martinez

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Engineering, Aviation and Technology, Saint Louis University Madrid, 28003 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jose Luis Gabriel

    (Departamento Medio Ambiente y Agronomía, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Ctra. de la Coruña km 7,5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Centro de Estudios e Investigación para la Gestión de Riesgos Agrarios y Medioambientales (CEIGRAM-UPM), Senda del Rey 13, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Sergio Alvarez

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Anibal Capuano

    (Camelina Company S.L. Spain, Camino de la Carrera 11-11, Fuente el Saz de Jarama, 28140 Madrid, Spain)

  • Maria del Mar Delgado

    (Departamento Medio Ambiente y Agronomía, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Ctra. de la Coruña km 7,5, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to provide quantitative agronomic data and environmental performance through a life cycle assessment of camelina in a crop rotation. For this purpose, camelina [ Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] was included in a crop rotation (camelina-barley [ Hordeum vulgare (L.)]-camelina) fertilized with two organic fertilizers (dewatered sludge and composted sludge) during three growing seasons (2015–2018). Three treatments were considered in this experimental study of 0.018 ha: (1) Fertilization with composted sludge (15 t ha −1 ), (2) fertilization with dewatered sludge (35 t ha −1 ), and (3) control treatment without fertilization. Results showed that camelina’s yield was affected by climatic conditions, ranging from 0.9 to 1.4 t ha −1 in the first season (2015/2016) and the third season (2017/2018 and did not present significant differences between treatments. The yield components with a positive response to organic fertilization were number of silicles, number of seeds per plant, and thousand-seed weight, with an average increase compared to the control of 23.7%, 16.5%, and 18.5%, respectively. A negative correlation was observed between organic fertilization and total fat content, contrary to the increase in protein content observed with organic fertilization. The environmental assessment of this crop rotation revealed that fertilization and transport were the main hotspots. Despite the undesirable weather limitations, this study showed a positive response of camelina’s yield components and seed quality to organic fertilization. By applying these organic fertilizers, it may be possible to obtain favorable camelina yields and promote waste valorization. To minimize the environmental impacts of this crop rotation with camelina, the main recommendations could be to reduce the distances between the dewatering and composting sites and the field and optimize fertilization rates. Further research is needed to determine the application of these organic fertilizers in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Martinez & Jose Luis Gabriel & Sergio Alvarez & Anibal Capuano & Maria del Mar Delgado, 2021. "Integral Assessment of Organic Fertilization on a Camelina sativa Rotation under Mediterranean Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:355-:d:536906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/4/355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martinez, Sara & Alvarez, Sergio & Capuano, Anibal & Delgado, Maria del Mar, 2020. "Environmental performance of animal feed production from Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz: Influence of crop management practices under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Hafiz Muhammad Abrar Ilyas & Majeed Safa & Alison Bailey & Sara Rauf & Marvin Pangborn, 2019. "The Carbon Footprint of Energy Consumption in Pastoral and Barn Dairy Farming Systems: A Case Study from Canterbury, New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Prechsl, Ulrich E. & Wittwer, Raphael & van der Heijden, Marcel G.A. & Lüscher, Gisela & Jeanneret, Philippe & Nemecek, Thomas, 2017. "Assessing the environmental impacts of cropping systems and cover crops: Life cycle assessment of FAST, a long-term arable farming field experiment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 39-50.
    4. Berti, Marisol & Johnson, Burton & Ripplinger, David & Gesch, Russ & Aponte, Alfredo, 2017. "Environmental impact assessment of double- and relay-cropping with winter camelina in the northern Great Plains, USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-12.
    5. MacWilliam, S. & Wismer, M. & Kulshreshtha, S., 2014. "Life cycle and economic assessment of Western Canadian pulse systems: The inclusion of pulses in crop rotations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 43-53.
    6. Aritz Royo-Esnal & Francisco Valencia-Gredilla, 2018. "Camelina as a Rotation Crop for Weed Control in Organic Farming in a Semiarid Mediterranean Climate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    7. Santamaría, Marta & Azqueta, Diego, 2015. "Promoting biofuels use in Spain: A cost-benefit analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1415-1424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piernicola Masella & Incoronata Galasso, 2020. "A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Study of Bio-Energy Feedstock from Camelina sativa , an Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Teodora Stillitano & Emanuele Spada & Nathalie Iofrida & Giacomo Falcone & Anna Irene De Luca, 2021. "Sustainable Agri-Food Processes and Circular Economy Pathways in a Life Cycle Perspective: State of the Art of Applicative Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Cecchin, Andrea & Pourhashem, Ghasideh & Gesch, Russ W. & Lenssen, Andrew W. & Mohammed, Yesuf A. & Patel, Swetabh & Berti, Marisol T., 2021. "Environmental trade-offs of relay-cropping winter cover crops with soybean in a maize-soybean cropping system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Jasmina Ćetković & Slobodan Lakić & Angelina Živković & Miloš Žarković & Radoje Vujadinović, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Measures for GHG Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    6. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Revoyron, Eva & Le Bail, Marianne & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Gunnarsson, Anita & Seghetti, Marco & Colombo, Luca, 2022. "Diversity and drivers of crop diversification pathways of European farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Azman, Nadia Farhana & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Kadier, Abudukeremu & Shukor, Hafiza & Al-Shorgani, Najeeb Kaid Nasser & Hamid, Aidil Abdul & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid, 2016. "Utilization of palm kernel cake as a renewable feedstock for fermentative hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 700-708.
    10. Aui, Alvina & Wang, Yu, 2022. "Post-RFS supports for cellulosic ethanol: Evaluation of economic and environmental impacts of alternative policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Choi, Gobong & Huh, Sung-Yoon & Heo, Eunnyeong & Lee, Chul-Yong, 2018. "Prices versus quantities: Comparing economic efficiency of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard in promoting renewable electricity generation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 239-248.
    12. Mark A. Liebig & David W. Archer & Jonathan J. Halvorson & Holly A. Johnson & Nicanor Z. Saliendra & Jason R. Gross & Donald L. Tanaka, 2019. "Net Global Warming Potential of Spring Wheat Cropping Systems in a Semiarid Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Nicole Bamber & Ian Turner & Baishali Dutta & Mohammed Davoud Heidari & Nathan Pelletier, 2023. "Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Grain and Oilseed Crops: Review and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Kun Mo LEE & Min Hyeok LEE, 2021. "Uncertainty of the Electricity Emission Factor Incorporating the Uncertainty of the Fuel Emission Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Javier Prieto Ruiz & Simone Bergonzoli & Consuelo Attolico & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Mechanical Harvesting of Camelina: Work Productivity, Costs and Seed Loss Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Chenyang Liu & Xinyao Wang & Ziming Bai & Hongye Wang & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Does Digital Technology Application Promote Carbon Emission Efficiency in Dairy Farms? Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Plaza-Bonilla, Daniel & Nogué-Serra, Irene & Raffaillac, Didier & Cantero-Martínez, Carlos & Justes, Éric, 2018. "Carbon footprint of cropping systems with grain legumes and cover crops: A case-study in SW France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 92-102.
    18. Felix Schläpfer, 2020. "External Costs of Agriculture Derived from Payments for Agri-Environment Measures: Framework and Application to Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Iris Montero-Muñoz & David Mostaza-Colado & Aníbal Capuano & Pedro V. Mauri Ablanque, 2023. "Seed and Straw Characterization of Nine New Varieties of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    20. Attahiru, Yusuf Babangida & Aziz, Md. Maniruzzaman A. & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & Shahid, Shamsuddin & Wan Abu Bakar, Wan Azelee & NSashruddin, Thanwa Filza & Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul & Ahamed, Mohd Imra, 2019. "A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 600-613.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:355-:d:536906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.