IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i2p90-d484212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Spring Wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) to Deficit Irrigation Management under the Semi-Arid Environment of Egypt: Field and Modeling Study

Author

Listed:
  • Samiha Ouda

    (Agricultural Research Center, Water Requirements and Field Irrigation Research Department, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Giza 12619, Egypt)

  • Tahany Noreldin

    (Agricultural Research Center, Water Requirements and Field Irrigation Research Department, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Giza 12619, Egypt)

  • Juan José Alarcón

    (Irrigation Department, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus Universitario de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Ragab Ragab

    (UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UK CEH), Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK)

  • Gianluca Caruso

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici (Naples), Italy)

  • Agnieszka Sekara

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture, 31-120 Krakow, Poland)

  • Magdi T. Abdelhamid

    (Botany Department, National Research Centre, 33 EL Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt)

Abstract

In many areas of the world, water shortages prevail and threaten food production. Deficit irrigation was commonly investigated in dry areas as a precious and sustainable production approach. Using the CropSyst model to simulate the effects of different deficit irrigation treatments could help draw conclusions and save time, effort, and money. Therefore, the aims of this research were (i) to calibrate and validate the CropSyst model for wheat under different sustained and phenological stage-based deficit irrigation treatments, (ii) to simulate the impacts of the latter treatments on limiting wheat yield reduction. Two field experiments were conducted in Nubaria (Egypt), representing an arid environment. They included seven irrigation treatments: (1) 100%, (2) 75%, or (3) 50% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) during the whole crop cycle; (4) 50% ETc at tillering only, or (5) at booting only, or (6) at grain filling only, or (7) at both tillering and grain filling, with the replenishment of 100% ETc to the treatments (4) to (7) in the remaining phenological stages. The results revealed that phenological stage-based deficit irrigation of wheat resulted in lower yield reduction compared to sustained deficit irrigation treatments, with a 6% yield reduction when 50% ETc was applied at the booting stage. Wheat yield loss was reduced to 4 or 6% when 95 or 90% of ETc were applied, respectively. The CropSyst model accurately simulated wheat grain and total dry matter under deficit irrigation with low RMSE value. In conclusion, the CropSyst model can be reliably used for evaluating the strategy of planned deficit irrigation management in terms of wheat production under the arid environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Samiha Ouda & Tahany Noreldin & Juan José Alarcón & Ragab Ragab & Gianluca Caruso & Agnieszka Sekara & Magdi T. Abdelhamid, 2021. "Response of Spring Wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) to Deficit Irrigation Management under the Semi-Arid Environment of Egypt: Field and Modeling Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:90-:d:484212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/2/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Anil Kumar & Tripathy, Rojalin & Chopra, Usha Kiran, 2008. "Evaluation of CERES-Wheat and CropSyst models for water-nitrogen interactions in wheat crop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 776-786, July.
    2. Stockle, Claudio O. & Martin, Steve A. & Campbell, Gaylon S., 1994. "CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model: Water/nitrogen budgets and crop yield," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 335-359.
    3. Bekele, Samson & Tilahun, Ketema, 2007. "Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of onion in a semiarid region of Ethiopia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 148-152, April.
    4. Benli, B. & Pala, M. & Stockle, C. & Oweis, T., 2007. "Assessment of winter wheat production under early sowing with supplemental irrigation in a cold highland environment using CropSyst simulation model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(1-2), pages 45-53, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montoya, F. & Camargo, D. & Domínguez, A. & Ortega, J.F. & Córcoles, J.I., 2018. "Parametrization of Cropsyst model for the simulation of a potato crop in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 297-310.
    2. Abi Saab, Marie Therese & Todorovic, Mladen & Albrizio, Rossella, 2015. "Comparing AquaCrop and CropSyst models in simulating barley growth and yield under different water and nitrogen regimes. Does calibration year influence the performance of crop growth models?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 21-33.
    3. Geerts, Sam & Raes, Dirk, 2009. "Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1275-1284, September.
    4. Kaur, Harsimran & Huggins, David R. & Carlson, Bryan & Stockle, Claudio & Nelson, Roger, 2022. "Dryland fallow vs flex-cropping decisions in inland Pacific Northwest of USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Andarzian, B. & Bannayan, M. & Steduto, P. & Mazraeh, H. & Barati, M.E. & Barati, M.A. & Rahnama, A., 2011. "Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 1-8.
    6. Yunfeng Li & Quanqing Feng & Dongwei Li & Mingfa Li & Huifeng Ning & Qisheng Han & Abdoul Kader Mounkaila Hamani & Yang Gao & Jingsheng Sun, 2022. "Water-Salt Thresholds of Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) under Film Drip Irrigation in Arid Saline-Alkali Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Paresh B. Shirsath & Vinay Kumar Sehgal & Pramod K. Aggarwal, 2020. "Downscaling Regional Crop Yields to Local Scale Using Remote Sensing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Badini, Oumarou & Stockle, Claudio O. & Jones, Jim W. & Nelson, Roger & Kodio, Amadou & Keita, Moussa, 2007. "A simulation-based analysis of productivity and soil carbon in response to time-controlled rotational grazing in the West African Sahel region," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 87-96, April.
    9. Pala, M. & Stockle, C. O. & Harris, H. C., 1996. "Simulation of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) growth under different water and nitrogen regimes in a mediterranean environment using CropSyst," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 147-163, June.
    10. Anshuman Gunawat & Devesh Sharma & Aditya Sharma & Swatantra Kumar Dubey, 2022. "Assessment of climate change impact and potential adaptation measures on wheat yield using the DSSAT model in the semi-arid environment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 2077-2096, March.
    11. Tahiri, Adel Zeggaf & Anyoji, H. & Yasuda, H., 2006. "Fixed and variable light extinction coefficients for estimating plant transpiration and soil evaporation under irrigated maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(1-2), pages 186-192, July.
    12. Cabelguenne, M. & Debaeke, P. & Bouniols, A., 1999. "EPICphase, a version of the EPIC model simulating the effects of water and nitrogen stress on biomass and yield, taking account of developmental stages: validation on maize, sunflower, sorghum, soybea," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 175-196, June.
    13. Perez, Carlos & Roncoli, Carla & Neely, Constance & Steiner, Jean L., 2007. "Can carbon sequestration markets benefit low-income producers in semi-arid Africa? Potentials and challenges," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-12, April.
    14. Jalota, S.K. & Singh, Sukhvinder & Chahal, G.B.S. & Ray, S.S. & Panigraghy, S. & Bhupinder-Singh & Singh, K.B., 2010. "Soil texture, climate and management effects on plant growth, grain yield and water use by rainfed maize-wheat cropping system: Field and simulation study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 83-90, January.
    15. Paleari, Livia & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis of a sensitivity analysis: We are likely overlooking the impact of distributional assumptions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 57-63.
    16. Mavromatis, T., 2016. "Spatial resolution effects on crop yield forecasts: An application to rainfed wheat yield in north Greece with CERES-Wheat," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 38-48.
    17. Bocchiola, D. & Brunetti, L. & Soncini, A. & Polinelli, F. & Gianinetto, M., 2019. "Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and food security in the Himalayas: A case study in Nepal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 113-125.
    18. Paleari, Livia & Movedi, Ermes & Zoli, Michele & Burato, Andrea & Cecconi, Irene & Errahouly, Jabir & Pecollo, Eleonora & Sorvillo, Carla & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 455(C).
    19. Iqbal, M. Anjum & Shen, Yanjun & Stricevic, Ruzica & Pei, Hongwei & Sun, Hongyoung & Amiri, Ebrahim & Penas, Angel & del Rio, Sara, 2014. "Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 61-72.
    20. Wang, Xiangping & Huang, Guanhua & Yang, Jingsong & Huang, Quanzhong & Liu, Haijun & Yu, Lipeng, 2015. "An assessment of irrigation practices: Sprinkler irrigation of winter wheat in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 197-208.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:90-:d:484212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.