IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6473-d1702079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Farming System and Irrigation on Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Soil Under Spring Wheat Crops

Author

Listed:
  • Elżbieta Harasim

    (Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Cezary A. Kwiatkowski

    (Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

A field experiment in growing spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.—cv. ‘Monsun’) under organic, integrated and conventional farming systems was conducted over the period of 2020–2022 at the Czesławice Experimental Farm (Lubelskie Voivodeship, Poland). The first experimental factor analyzed was the farming system: A. organic system (control)—without the use of chemical plant protection products and NPK mineral fertilization; B. conventional system—the use of plant protection products and NPK fertilization in the range and doses recommended for spring wheat; C. integrated system—use of plant protection products and NPK fertilization in an “economical” way—doses reduced by 50%. The second experimental factor was irrigation strategy: 1. no irrigation—control; 2. double irrigation; 3. multiple irrigation The aim of the research was to determine the physical, chemical, and enzymatic properties of loess soil under spring wheat crops as influenced by the factors listed above. The highest organic C content of the soil (1.11%) was determined in the integrated system with multiple irrigation of spring wheat, whereas the lowest one (0.77%)—in the conventional system without irrigation. In the conventional system, the highest contents of total N (0.15%), P (131.4 mg kg −1 ), and K (269.6 mg kg −1 ) in the soil were determined under conditions of multiple irrigation. In turn, the organic system facilitated the highest contents of Mg, B, Cu, Mn, and Zn in the soil, especially upon multiple irrigation of crops. It also had the most beneficial effect on the evaluated physical parameters of the soil. In each farming system, the multiple irrigation of spring wheat significantly increased moisture content, density, and compaction of the soil and also improved its total sorption capacity (particularly in the integrated system). The highest count of beneficial fungi, the lowest population number of pathogenic fungi, and the highest count of actinobacteria were recorded in the soil from the organic system. Activity of soil enzymes was the highest in the integrated system, followed by the organic system—particularly upon multiple irrigation of crops. Summing up, the present study results demonstrate varied effects of the farming systems on the quality and health of loess soil. From a scientific point of view, the integrated farming system ensures the most stable and balanced physicochemical and biological parameters of the soil due to the sufficient amount of nutrients supplied to the soil and the minimized impact of chemical plant protection products on the soil. The multiple irrigation of crops resulting from indications of soil moisture sensors mounted on plots (indicating the real need for irrigation) contributed to the improvement of almost all analyzed soil quality indices. Multiple irrigation generated high costs, but in combination with fertilization and chemical crop protection (conventional and integrated system), it influenced the high productivity of spring wheat and compensated for the incurred costs (the greatest profit).

Suggested Citation

  • Elżbieta Harasim & Cezary A. Kwiatkowski, 2025. "Effect of Farming System and Irrigation on Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Soil Under Spring Wheat Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6473-:d:1702079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wiem Sdiri & Huda S. AlSalem & Soha T. Al-Goul & Mona S. Binkadem & Hedi Ben Mansour, 2023. "Assessing the Effects of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Liu, W. Z. & Hunsaker, D. J. & Li, Y. S. & Xie, X. Q. & Wall, G. W., 2002. "Interrelations of yield, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency from marginal analysis of water production functions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 143-151, July.
    3. Miodrag Tolimir & Branka Kresović & Katarina Gajić & Violeta Anđelković & Milan Brankov & Marijana Dugalić & Boško Gajić, 2024. "Integrated effect of irrigation rate and plant density on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of maize," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(8), pages 475-482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan J. Espada & Rosalía Rodríguez & Andrea Delgado & Gemma Vicente & Luis Fernando Bautista, 2024. "Assessing Environmental Sustainability of Phytoremediation to Remove Copper from Contaminated Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Liuyue He & Sufen Wang & Congcong Peng & Qian Tan, 2018. "Optimization of Water Consumption Distribution Based on Crop Suitability in the Middle Reaches of Heihe River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Eric Njuki & Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 2019. "Examining irrigation productivity in U.S. agriculture using a single-factor approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 125-136, June.
    4. Liu, Yi & Li, Shiqing & Chen, Fang & Yang, Shenjiao & Chen, Xinping, 2010. "Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water management practices on the Loess Plateau, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 769-775, May.
    5. Gohar, Abdelaziz A. & Cashman, Adrian, 2016. "A methodology to assess the impact of climate variability and change on water resources, food security and economic welfare," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 51-64.
    6. Mandal, K.G. & Thakur, A.K. & Mohanty, S., 2019. "Paired-row planting and furrow irrigation increased light interception, pod yield and water use efficiency of groundnut in a hot sub-humid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 968-977.
    7. Lin, Wen & Liu, Wenzhao, 2016. "Establishment and application of spring maize yield to evapotranspiration boundary function in the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 345-349.
    8. Sarkar, S. & Nanda, M.K. & Biswas, M. & Mukherjee, A. & Kundu, M., 2009. "Different indices to characterize water use pattern of irrigated cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) in a hot sub-humid climate of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1475-1482, October.
    9. Mukherjee, A. & Sarkar, S. & Chakraborty, P.K., 2012. "Marginal analysis of water productivity function of tomato crop grown under different irrigation regimes and mulch managements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-127.
    10. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2018. "Determining water use efficiency of wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 48-60.
    11. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2016. "Determining water use efficiency for wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236059, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Greaves, Geneille E. & Wang, Yu-Min, 2017. "Effect of regulated deficit irrigation scheduling on water use of corn in southern Taiwan tropical environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 115-125.
    13. Breno Leonan de Carvalho Lima & Jucilene Silva Araújo & José Thyago Aires Souza & Elder Cunha de Lira & Jose Nildo Tabosa & Eurico Lustosa do Nascimento Alencar & Jose Edson Florentino de Moraes & Cer, 2025. "Domestic Reclaimed Water for Circular Agriculture: Improving Agronomic Performance of Sweet Sorghum in a Semiarid Tropical Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Arthur Landry Tapa Tagny & Alexis Boukong & Boris Merlain Kanouo Djousse & Etienne Mboua & Jean Pierre Mvondo Awono & Cecile Merveille Ernestine Boyomo Sanga, 2023. "Effect of Organic Mulch and Water Supply on Yield and Profitability in Black Nightshade (Solanum Scabrum Mill.) in West Cameroon," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 8(10), pages 19-30, October.
    15. Bouma, Jetske A. & Biggs, Trent W. & Bouwer, Laurens M., 2011. "The downstream externalities of harvesting rainwater in semi-arid watersheds: An Indian case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(7), pages 1162-1170, May.
    16. Sarkar, S. & Goswami, S.B. & Mallick, S. & Nanda, M.K., 2008. "Different indices to characterize water use pattern of micro-sprinkler irrigated onion (Allium cepa L.)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 625-632, May.
    17. Octavio Villalobos-Cano & Eduardo Santellano-Estrada & Blair L. Stringam & Kulbhushan Grover & Edgar Esparza-Vela, 2024. "Estimating Water Use Efficiency for Major Crops in Chihuahua, Mexico: Crop Yield Function Models vs. Evapotranspiration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, February.
    18. Lankford, Bruce A., 2004. "Resource-centred thinking in river basins; should we revoke the crop water requirement approach to irrigation planning?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 33-46, July.
    19. Mu, Zhaotao & Liu, Wenzhao & Ma, Ning & Cheng, Changwu & Zhou, Haixiang, 2024. "Relations of rescaled to non-rescaled complementary models and improvement of evapotranspiration estimation by incorporating both climatic and land surface conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6473-:d:1702079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.