Author
Listed:
- Raul Ionuț Riti
(Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
- Claudiu Ioan Abrudan
(Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
- Laura Bacali
(Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
- Nicolae Bâlc
(Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
Abstract
Organizations face rising market volatility, while legacy, plan-driven structures struggle to translate strategy into adaptive execution. Prior studies discuss product-centric operating models, yet typically treat decision rights, product definition, and technology-enabled execution separately. This paper introduces the WHO–WHAT–HOW framework, an authorial synthesis that links decision boundaries (WHO), product scope and value hypotheses (WHAT), and workflow and technology routines (HOW) into a single, operational model. A triangulated design is employed, comprising a systematic document analysis of 62 sources published between 2018 and 2024, illustrative case studies of Amazon and Spotify, and a scenario-based organizational illustration that contrasts a baseline hierarchy with a WHO–WHAT–HOW configuration. Rather than constituting empirical validation, these elements serve as illustrative demonstrations of conceptual plausibility. Indicative composite indices, synthetically constructed from document-coded constructs and simulated rules, suggest improvements in decision speed, cycle time, and coordination; these indices are heuristic and non-inferential. The contribution is threefold: First, it provides a pragmatic five-step implementation roadmap. Then, we make the mechanisms concrete via a construct-to-rule mapping and three rule-based vignettes (incident pathway, value-hypothesis experiment, cross-team dependency), showing how WHO–WHAT–HOW compresses decision time, cycle time, and coordination without introducing new measurement programs. Finally, the composite indices remain heuristic and non-inferential. Limitations include reliance on secondary evidence and a scenario-based, non-empirical illustration; robust validation requires longitudinal, multi-sector primary data and testing in regulated or low-automation settings.
Suggested Citation
Raul Ionuț Riti & Claudiu Ioan Abrudan & Laura Bacali & Nicolae Bâlc, 2025.
"WHO–WHAT–HOW: A Product Operating Model for Agile, Technology-Enabled Digital Transformation,"
Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:368-:d:1751258
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:368-:d:1751258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.