IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i9p368-d1751258.html

WHO–WHAT–HOW: A Product Operating Model for Agile, Technology-Enabled Digital Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Raul Ionuț Riti

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Claudiu Ioan Abrudan

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Laura Bacali

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Nicolae Bâlc

    (Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Robotics, and Production Management, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Organizations face rising market volatility, while legacy, plan-driven structures struggle to translate strategy into adaptive execution. Prior studies discuss product-centric operating models, yet typically treat decision rights, product definition, and technology-enabled execution separately. This paper introduces the WHO–WHAT–HOW framework, an authorial synthesis that links decision boundaries (WHO), product scope and value hypotheses (WHAT), and workflow and technology routines (HOW) into a single, operational model. A triangulated design is employed, comprising a systematic document analysis of 62 sources published between 2018 and 2024, illustrative case studies of Amazon and Spotify, and a scenario-based organizational illustration that contrasts a baseline hierarchy with a WHO–WHAT–HOW configuration. Rather than constituting empirical validation, these elements serve as illustrative demonstrations of conceptual plausibility. Indicative composite indices, synthetically constructed from document-coded constructs and simulated rules, suggest improvements in decision speed, cycle time, and coordination; these indices are heuristic and non-inferential. The contribution is threefold: First, it provides a pragmatic five-step implementation roadmap. Then, we make the mechanisms concrete via a construct-to-rule mapping and three rule-based vignettes (incident pathway, value-hypothesis experiment, cross-team dependency), showing how WHO–WHAT–HOW compresses decision time, cycle time, and coordination without introducing new measurement programs. Finally, the composite indices remain heuristic and non-inferential. Limitations include reliance on secondary evidence and a scenario-based, non-empirical illustration; robust validation requires longitudinal, multi-sector primary data and testing in regulated or low-automation settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Raul Ionuț Riti & Claudiu Ioan Abrudan & Laura Bacali & Nicolae Bâlc, 2025. "WHO–WHAT–HOW: A Product Operating Model for Agile, Technology-Enabled Digital Transformation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:368-:d:1751258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delen, Dursun & Zolbanin, Hamed M., 2018. "The analytics paradigm in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 186-195.
    2. Michael Haenlein & Andreas Kaplan & Chee-Wee Tan & Pengzhu Zhang, 2019. "Artificial intelligence (AI) and management analytics," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 341-343, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca Dingus & Hulda G. Black & Nicole A. Flink, 2024. "Analytics for all marketing majors: sparking interest in the uninterested," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 126-141, June.
    2. Kumar, V. & Ramachandran, Divya & Kumar, Binay, 2021. "Influence of new-age technologies on marketing: A research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 864-877.
    3. Christopher Wissuchek & Patrick Zschech, 2025. "Prescriptive analytics systems revised: a systematic literature review from an information systems perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 279-353, June.
    4. Carlson, Keith & Kopalle, Praveen K. & Riddell, Allen & Rockmore, Daniel & Vana, Prasad, 2023. "Complementing human effort in online reviews: A deep learning approach to automatic content generation and review synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 54-74.
    5. Cebi, Selcuk & Karakurt, Necip Fazıl & Kurtulus, Erkan & Tokgoz, Bunyamin, 2024. "Development of a decision support system for client acceptance in independent audit process," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Aydiner, Arafat Salih & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Bayraktar, Erkan & Zaim, Selim & Delen, Dursun, 2019. "Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 228-237.
    7. De Caigny, Arno & Coussement, Kristof & Hoornaert, Steven & Meire, Matthijs, 2025. "Life event-based marketing using AI," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. David M. Goldberg & Nohel Zaman & Arin Brahma & Mariano Aloiso, 2022. "Are mortgage loan closing delay risks predictable? A predictive analysis using text mining on discussion threads," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 419-437, March.
    9. Yongdang Chen & Zhiyou Han & Kunyu Cao & Xianrong Zheng & Xiaobo Xu, 2020. "Manufacturing upgrading in industry 4.0 era," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 766-771, July.
    10. Ranjan Chaudhuri & Sheshadri Chatterjee & Demetris Vrontis & Alkis Thrassou, 2024. "Adoption of robust business analytics for product innovation and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational data-driven culture," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1757-1791, August.
    11. Godé, Cécile & Brion, Sébastien, 2024. "The affordance-actualization process of predictive analytics: Towards a configurational framework of a predictive policing system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Anastasia Griva & Cleopatra Bardaki & Katerina Pramatari & Georgios Doukidis, 2022. "Factors Affecting Customer Analytics: Evidence from Three Retail Cases," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 493-516, April.
    13. Zhongyi Piao & Seayoung Park & Jin Sung Rha & Jiho Yoon, 2025. "Consumer recognition of service and product attributes in smartphone rivalries," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Zimei Liu & Kefan Xie & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2020. "A paradigm of safety management in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 632-645, July.
    15. Efpraxia D. Zamani & Anastasia Griva & Kieran Conboy, 2022. "Using Business Analytics for SME Business Model Transformation under Pandemic Time Pressure," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1145-1166, August.
    16. Baoshan Ge & Liyi Zhao, 2022. "The impact of the integration of opportunity and resources of new ventures on entrepreneurial performance: The moderating role of BDAC‐AI," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 440-461, May.
    17. Mislina Atan, 2025. "Mapping the Research Landscape of Business Analytics," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 9621-9643, September.
    18. Makarius, Erin E. & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Fox, Joseph D. & Fox, Alexa K., 2020. "Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 262-273.
    19. Jeff Allen & Santiago Carbo Valverde & Sujit Chakravorti & Francisco Rodriguez-Fernandez & Oya Pinar Ardic, 2022. "Assessing Incentives to Increase Digital Payment Acceptance and Usage," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 37487, April.
    20. Shiyu Liu & Ou Liu & Junyang Chen, 2023. "A Review on Business Analytics: Definitions, Techniques, Applications and Challenges," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:368-:d:1751258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.