IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i1p18-d502474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Consumers’ Discontinuance Intention of Remote Mobile Payments during Post-Adoption Usage: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Maksym Koghut

    (Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK)

  • Omar AI-Tabbaa

    (Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK)

Abstract

Despite being critical to continuous technology usage, research on remote mobile payments (m-payments) post-adoption usage has received much less attention. Furthermore, information systems usage research has traditionally been positively oriented, generally assuming that the inhibiting and enabling factors influencing technology usage as being the opposite sides of one dimension, which may result in overlooking antecedents to technology continuance. Therefore, this study aims to explore the inhibiting factors that may directly influence customers’ intention to discontinue m-payments during post-adoption usage. Drawing on behavioral theories, information systems, and marketing research, this study explores the inhibiting factors directly influencing consumers’ intentions to discontinue using m-payments. Survey data were collected from 254 current users in the UK and the PLS-SEM technique is employed to test hypotheses. The results show that poor quality of system, information, and service, as usage inhibitors, directly influence consumers’ discontinuance intentions. Importantly, usage frequency is found to have no moderating effect on the inhibitors of continuance intention, supporting the notion about different and asymmetric effects that negative factors can have on technology usage compared to positive ones. This interesting finding suggests that negative user experience will have different and asymmetric effects on intentions to use m-payments than positive user experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Maksym Koghut & Omar AI-Tabbaa, 2021. "Exploring Consumers’ Discontinuance Intention of Remote Mobile Payments during Post-Adoption Usage: An Empirical Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:18-:d:502474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/18/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/1/18/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monecke, Armin & Leisch, Friedrich, 2012. "semPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i03).
    2. Madhavan Parthasarathy & Anol Bhattacherjee, 1998. "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 362-379, December.
    3. Ruiz Díaz, Gonzalo, 2017. "The influence of satisfaction on customer retention in mobile phone market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 75-85.
    4. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    5. Oecd, 2013. "Electronic and Mobile Commerce," OECD Digital Economy Papers 228, OECD Publishing.
    6. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    7. Wang, Rebecca Jen-Hui & Malthouse, Edward C. & Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, 2015. "On the Go: How Mobile Shopping Affects Customer Purchase Behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 217-234.
    8. Yan, Li-Ya & Tan, Garry Wei-Han & Loh, Xiu-Ming & Hew, Jun-Jie & Ooi, Keng-Boon, 2021. "QR code and mobile payment: The disruptive forces in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    9. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    10. Ping Zhang & Gisela M. von Dran, 2000. "Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: A two‐factor model for website design and evaluation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(14), pages 1253-1268.
    11. Carol Pollard, 2003. "Exploring Continued and Discontinued Use of IT: A Case Study of OptionFinder, a Group Support System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 171-193, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhong, Junying & Chen, Tiao, 2023. "Antecedents of mobile payment loyalty: An extended perspective of perceived value and information system success model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    2. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    4. Oguz YILDIZ & Hakan KITAPCI, 2018. "Exploring Factors Affecting Consumers¡¯ Adoption of Shopping via Mobile Applications in Turkey," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 60-75, June.
    5. Luceri, Beatrice & (Tammo) Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Bellini, Silvia & Aiolfi, Simone, 2022. "What drives consumers to shop on mobile devices? Insights from a Meta-Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 178-196.
    6. Alraja, Mansour, 2022. "Frontline healthcare providers’ behavioural intention to Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled healthcare applications: A gender-based, cross-generational study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Peters, Twan & Işık, Öykü & Tona, Olgerta & Popovič, Aleš, 2016. "How system quality influences mobile BI use: The mediating role of engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 773-783.
    8. Hossain Md. Motaher & Zahidul Islam K. M. & Masud Abdullah Al & Biswas Sukanta & Hossain Md. Alamgir, 2021. "Behavioral intention and continued adoption of Facebook: An exploratory study of graduate students in Bangladesh during the Covid-19 pandemic," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 153-186, December.
    9. Lama Zalloum & Hamad Alghadeer & Nawras Nusairat, 2019. "The Effect of Using Mobile Banking Services Applications on Electronic Word of Mouth: The Mediating Role of Perceived Trust," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 62-80, September.
    10. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    11. MinJae Lee & JinKyu Lee, 2012. "The impact of information security failure on customer behaviors: A study on a large-scale hacking incident on the internet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 375-393, April.
    12. Yeo, Vincent Cheow Sern & Goh, See-Kwong & Rezaei, Sajad, 2017. "Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-162.
    13. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2015. "Exploring the intention to continue using web-based self-service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 85-93.
    14. Fahad Asmi & Rongting Zhou & Liu Lu, 2017. "E-government Adoption in Developing Countries: Need of Customer-centric Approach: A Case of Pakistan," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 42-58, January.
    15. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "Consumer processing of mobile online stores: Sources and effects of processing fluency," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 137-147.
    16. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Juan Sánchez-Fernández & María I. Viedma-del Jesús, 2016. "The moderating effect of user experience on satisfaction with electronic banking: empirical evidence from the Spanish case," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 141-165, February.
    17. Ronald T. Cenfetelli & Andrew Schwarz, 2011. "Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 808-823, December.
    18. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    19. Kwahk, Kee-Young & Ahn, Hyunchul & Ryu, Young U., 2018. "Understanding mandatory IS use behavior: How outcome expectations affect conative IS use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-76.
    20. Gabor Aranyi & Paul Schaik, 2015. "Modeling user experience with news websites," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2471-2493, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:18-:d:502474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.