IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fru/finjrn/240105p78-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability and Security of Green Finance from the Multi-agent Games Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Maria V. Sigova

    (Autonomus Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education “International Banking Institute named after Anatoliy Sobchak”, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

  • Igor K. Klyuchnikov

    (Autonomus Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education “International Banking Institute named after Anatoliy Sobchak”, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

  • Oleg I. Klyuchnikov

    (Autonomus Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education “International Banking Institute named after Anatoliy Sobchak”, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Green finance increases the innovation potential of green transformation, helps to address climate change, the environmental crisis and energy security. It is important for green finance to achieve sustainable and balanced development, which will increase the security of both finance itself and many processes in the real economy that depend on it. The purpose of this study was to develop approaches to the ontological design of green finance and multi-agent modeling of the behavior of green finance actors, considering their sustainable and safe interaction. To achieve this goal it was necessary to clarify the conceptual apparatus of green finance and related areas; to characterize the "work" of the multi-agent model in the analysis of the behavior of the main green finance actors and to trace the prospects for their impact on the stability and security of the financial market; and finally, based on ontology construction and agent-based approach to nonlinear interactions in the green financial process, to determine the mechanism of building chains of the main market participants. The methodological basis of the study consists of general scientific research methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, logic), as well as evolutionary dynamics and agent-based approach to the analysis of financial markets. A comparative analysis of the works of various authors and the interpretation of theoretical provisions in related areas of knowledge about finance, as well as the analysis of their sustainable and safe development were carried out. As a result of the study, the authors identified the main approaches to the design of financial ontology and multi-agent modeling of financial interactions in the direction of determining their sustainable and safe development. The proposed model establishes that the criterion of the effectiveness of the applied strategy is the satisfaction with the state of financial impact on the economy, environment, and social sphere. Maintaining this state, along with saving the amount of resources used, is done through optimization. The chosen approach corresponds to the concept of sustainable development and safe functioning of the systems under consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria V. Sigova & Igor K. Klyuchnikov & Oleg I. Klyuchnikov, 2024. "Sustainability and Security of Green Finance from the Multi-agent Games Perspective," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 78-95, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:240105:p:78-95
    DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2024-1-78-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2024/1/statii/05_1_2024_v16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31107/2075-1990-2024-1-78-95?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Mengjuan & Zhu, Xiao & Liu, Meishan & Huang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Combining the role of green finance and environmental sustainability on green economic growth: Evidence from G-20 economies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 128-136.
    2. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    3. Wang, Quan-Jing & Tang, Kai & Hu, Hai-Qing, 2022. "The impact of digital finance on green innovation: Evidence from provinces in China," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    4. Raul P. Lejano, 2019. "Relationality and Social–Ecological Systems: Going Beyond or Behind Sustainability and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Peterson K. Ozili, 2022. "Green finance research around the world: a review of literature," International Journal of Green Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 56-75.
    6. Ozili, Peterson K, 2022. "Decentralized finance research and developments around the World," MPRA Paper 114338, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Mike Bennett, 2013. "The financial industry business ontology: Best practice for big data," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(3-4), pages 255-268, July.
    8. Ozili, Peterson Kitakogelu, 2022. "Green finance research around the world: a review of literature," MPRA Paper 114899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Xunfa & Huang, Nan & Mo, Jianlei & Ye, Zhitao, 2023. "Dynamics of the return and volatility connectedness among green finance markets during the COVID-19 pandemic," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Clara Paola Camargo-Díaz & Edwin Paipa-Sanabria & Julian Andres Zapata-Cortes & Yamileth Aguirre-Restrepo & Edgar Eduardo Quiñones-Bolaños, 2022. "A Review of Economic Incentives to Promote Decarbonization Alternatives in Maritime and Inland Waterway Transport Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Mertzanis, Charilaos, 2023. "FinTech finance and social-environmental performance around the world," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Xuelian Li & Tinghui Lu & Jyh-Horng Lin, 2022. "Bank Interest Margin and Green Lending Policy under Sunflower Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Mihaela Simionescu & Beáta Gavurová, 2023. "Pollution, income inequality and green finance in the new EU member states," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Jingyi Zhong & Weide Chun & Wu Deng & Hui Gao, 2023. "Can Mergers and Acquisitions Promote Technological Innovation in the New Energy Industry? An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Lithium Battery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Deming Dai & Yujia Xue, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on a Firm’s Value from the Perspective of Enterprise Life Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Liangdong Lu & Mengyao Wang & Jia Xu, 2023. "How to Keep Investors’ Confidence after Being Labeled as Polluting Firms: The Role of External Political Ties and Internal Green Innovation Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Kun Wang & Bing Chen & Yuhong Li, 2024. "Technological, process or managerial innovation? How does digital transformation affect green innovation in industrial enterprises?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.
    11. Seddon, Jonathan J.J.M. & Currie, Wendy L., 2017. "A model for unpacking big data analytics in high-frequency trading," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 300-307.
    12. Yu Wang & Yetaotao Qiu & Yi Luo, 2022. "CEO foreign experience and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2036-2051, July.
    13. Helmi Issa & Rachid Jabbouri, 2022. "Green Innovation in the MENA Healthcare Industry: A Knowledge-Based View," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa & Andrew G. Earle, 2022. "Innovating for Good in Opportunistic Contexts: The Case for Firms’ Environmental Divergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 705-721, April.
    15. Wunhong Su & Chun Guo & Xiaobao Song, 2022. "Media coverage, Environment Protection Law and environmental research and development: evidence from the Chinese-listed firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6953-6983, May.
    16. Jinchao Huang & Shuang Meng & Jiajie Yu, 2023. "The Effects of the Low-Carbon Pilot City Program on Green Innovation: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Rui Ding & Fangcheng Sun, 2023. "Impact of River Chief System on Green Technology Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Caterina Pietra & Roberto De Lotto & Rakan Bahshwan, 2021. "Approaching Healthy City Ontology: First-Level Classes Definition Using BFO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Aastvedt, Tonje Marthinsen & Behmiri, Niaz Bashiri & Lu, Li, 2021. "Does green innovation damage financial performance of oil and gas companies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Hung M. Nguyen & George Onofrei & Dothang Truong & Simon Lockrey, 2020. "Customer green orientation and process innovation alignment: A configuration approach in the global manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2498-2513, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    green finance; ontology; multi-agent modeling; sustainability; security;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F01 - International Economics - - General - - - Global Outlook
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • F37 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Finance Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:240105:p:78-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gennady Ageev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frigvru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.