IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fru/finjrn/230301p9-24.html

The Rent Taxation Concept for Solid Minerals Extraction and Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey D. Shatalov

    (Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation)

  • Milyausha R. Pinskaya

    (Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation)

  • Vitaly A. Prokaev

    (Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation)

  • Kermen N. Tsagan-Mandzshieva

    (Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article considers the conceptual approaches to the taxation of natural resource use. The purpose of the article is to identify the governmental tax risks in the implementation of various scenarios of mining rent withdrawal and to substantiate the methodology of resource taxation in extraction and processing of solid minerals, based on the principle of tax justice. The authors reveal the factors of tax risks for the state in exercising its sovereign right to the mining rent. The article formulates the requirements to the tax system, the observance of which will allow to consider the factors of the state tax risks. Advantages and disadvantages of certain fiscal payments for extraction of mineral raw materials are determined. It is shown that the resource tax should be based on the present value, calculated as the net present value of the investor for the entire lifetime of the project. The authors propose a mining rent taxation mechanism, which would increase budget revenues while maintaining the incentives for mining companies to invest in exploration. The main forks in the design of such a rent income tax are shown.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey D. Shatalov & Milyausha R. Pinskaya & Vitaly A. Prokaev & Kermen N. Tsagan-Mandzshieva, 2023. "The Rent Taxation Concept for Solid Minerals Extraction and Recovery," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 3, pages 9-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:230301:p:9-24
    DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-9-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2023/3/statii/01_3_2023_v15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-9-24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garnaut, Ross & Clunies-Ross, Anthony, 1983. "Taxation of Mineral Rents," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198284543.
    2. Alexander Klemm, 2007. "Allowances for Corporate Equity in Practice," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 53(2), pages 229-262, June.
    3. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7105 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7136 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Garnaut, Ross & Clunies Ross, Anthony, 1975. "Uncertainty, Risk Aversion and the Taxing of Natural Resource Projects," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 85(338), pages 272-287, June.
    6. Stern, Nicholas, 1987. "The effects of taxation, price control and government contracts in oligopoly and monopolistic competition," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 133-158, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Boadway & Michael Keen, 2014. "Rent Taxes and Royalties in Designing Fiscal Regimes for Non-Renewable Resources," CESifo Working Paper Series 4568, CESifo.
    2. Boadway, Robin & Keen, Michael, 2009. "Theoretical Perspectives on Resource Tax Design," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273692, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    3. Robin Boadway & Motohiro Sato & Jean-Francois Tremblay, 2015. "Cash-flow business taxation revisited: bankruptcy, risk aversion and asymmetric information," Working Papers 1531, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    4. Alexander G. Kemp, 1989. "Petroleum exploitation and contract terms in developing countries after the oil price collapse," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 13(2), pages 116-126, May.
    5. Ross Garnaut, 2024. "The Economic Public Interest in a World of Oligopoly," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 43(1), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Craig Emerson & Ross Garnaut, 1984. "Mineral Leasing Policy: Competitive Bidding and the Resource Rent Tax Given Various Responses to Risk," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 60(2), pages 133-142, June.
    7. Ross Garnaut & Craig Emerson & Reuben Finighan & Stephen Anthony, 2020. "Replacing Corporate Income Tax with a Cash Flow Tax," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 53(4), pages 463-481, December.
    8. Bourgain, Arnaud & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2020. "A tax competition approach to resource taxation in developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Bobylev, Yuri & Rasenko, Olesya, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Tax Regimes in the Oil Sector," Working Papers 041723, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    10. Lund, Diderik, 2002. "Rent taxation when cost monitoring is imperfect," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 211-228, June.
    11. Siebert, Horst, 1987. "Institutional arrangements for natural resources," Discussion Papers, Series II 26, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    12. Osmundsen, Petter & Wittemann, Anders, 2024. "Petroleum development projects. Concept selection, taxation and recovery rate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Robin Boadway & Motohiro Sato & Jean-François Tremblay, 2022. "Cash-flow business taxation revisited: bankruptcy and asymmetric information," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(4), pages 922-952, August.
    14. Kym Anderson, 2020. "Trade Protectionism In Australia: Its Growth And Dismantling," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1044-1067, December.
    15. Laporte, Bertrand & de Quatrebarbes, Céline, 2015. "What do we know about the sharing of mineral resource rent in Africa?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 239-249.
    16. repec:aen:journl:ej36-si1-osmundsen is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Coviello, Manlio & Perotti, Remco, 2015. "Governance of strategic minerals in Latin America: the case of Lithium," Documentos de Proyectos 38961, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Glenn Jenkins & G.P. SHUKLA, 1990. "Fiscal Policies For Mining (Gold) In The Pacific Islands," Development Discussion Papers 1990-03, JDI Executive Programs.
    19. Lambertini, Luca, 1997. "Optimal Fiscal Regime in a Spatial Duopoly," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 407-420, May.
    20. Allais, Olivier & Etilé, Fabrice & Lecocq, Sébastien, 2015. "Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: An empirical evaluation of fat policies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 27-44.
    21. Montag, Felix & Mamrak, Robin & Sagimuldina, Alina & Schnitzer, Monika, 2023. "Imperfect price information, market power, and tax pass-through," Working Papers 337, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General
    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • Q38 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy (includes OPEC Policy)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:230301:p:9-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gennady Ageev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frigvru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.