IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fas/journl/v11y2021i1p48-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimum Support Prices in India: Distilling the Facts

Author

Listed:
  • Prankur Gupta

    (Prankur Gupta is with the University of Texas, Austin, prankur@utexas.edu.)

  • Reetika Khera

    (Reetika Khera is at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, reetika@hss.iitd.ac.in.)

  • Sudha Narayanan

    (Sudha Narayanan is with the International Food Policy Research Institute, Delhi, S.Narayanan@cgiar.org.)

Abstract

In recent years in India, minimum support price (MSP) and government procurement, especially of paddy and wheat, have been discussed widely, but these discussions have often drawn on evidence that is dated and incomplete. Consequently, such discussions have clouded the facts, resulting in a large number of factoids. According to these popular misconceptions, very few farmers (6 per cent only) benefit from MSP and government procurement, only large farmers benefit, and only farmers of Punjab and Haryana (and, to some extent, western Uttar Pradesh) benefit. In this article, we examine these three factoids and draw on multiple data sources to distil the facts. We argue that the existing evidence suggests a more complex picture: (1) MSP impacts 13 per cent of paddy sellers and 16 per cent of wheat sellers; (2) the geographies of procurement have expanded to new States including, notably, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha; and (3) although at the national level there is a bias towards large farmers, this does not imply exclusion of small and marginal farmers. In fact, a majority of the beneficiaries are marginal and small farmers on both the extensive and the intensive margins. Further, we find substantial heterogeneity by States. Haryana, for instance, has a bias in favour of small and marginal farmers. We conclude that debates on MSP and procurement must therefore take into account the changed geography of procurement and the profile of sellers, and recognise the diversity of experiences relating to procurement across States.

Suggested Citation

  • Prankur Gupta & Reetika Khera & Sudha Narayanan, 2021. "Minimum Support Prices in India: Distilling the Facts," Journal, Review of Agrarian Studies, vol. 11(1), pages 48-71, January-J.
  • Handle: RePEc:fas:journl:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:48-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ras.org.in/minimum_support_prices_in_india
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas, Jayan Jose, 2011. "Paddy Cultivation in Kerala," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 1(2), December.
    2. Raju, S. & Rampal, Priya & Bhavani, R. V. & Rajshekar, S. C., 2018. "Introduction of Millets into the Public Distribution System: Lessons from Karnataka," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 8(2), December.
    3. S. Raju & Priya Rampal & R. V. Bhavani & S. C. Rajshekar, 2018. "Introduction of Millets into the Public Distribution System: Lessons from Karnataka," Journal, Review of Agrarian Studies, vol. 8(2), pages 120-136, July-Dece.
    4. Shweta Saini & Marta Kozicka, 2014. "Evolution and Critique of Buffer Stocking Policy of India," Working Papers id:6153, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pagare, Dewang & Biswas, Indranil & Agrahari, Amit & Ghosh, Sriparna, 2023. "A small farmer’s market choice in the presence of multiple markets: The Indian case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 739-753.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pandey, Adya & Bolia, Nomesh B., 2023. "Millet value chain revolution for sustainability: A proposal for India," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    2. Aditi Mukherji, 2022. "Sustainable Groundwater Management in India Needs a Water‐Energy‐Food Nexus Approach," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 394-410, March.
    3. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    4. Brockhaus, Jan & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Kozicka, Marta, 2016. "What Drives India’s Rice Stocks? Empirical Evidence," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235659, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Rahul Anand & Naresh Kumar & Mr. Volodymyr Tulin, 2016. "Understanding India’s Food Inflation: The Role of Demand and Supply Factors," IMF Working Papers 2016/002, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Kozicka, Marta & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Saini, Shweta & Brockhaus, Jan, 2014. "Modeling Indian Wheat and Rice Sector Policies," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169808, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Weber, Regine, 2015. "Welfare Impacts of Rising Food Prices: Evidence from India," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211901, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Marta Kozicka & Regine Weber & Matthias Kalkuhl, 2019. "Cash vs. in-kind transfers: the role of self-targeting in reforming the Indian food subsidy program," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(4), pages 915-927, August.
    9. JOHNSON, Deepak & KUROSAKI, Takashi, 2023. "Price Support and Farm Incomes : Comparative Study of Rice Growing Regions in Southern India and Mekong-Delta Vietnam," Discussion Paper Series 741, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    10. Elleby, Christian & Hansen, Henrik & Yu, Wusheng, 2015. "Domestic Price and Welfare Effects of the 2007-11 Indian Grain Export Restrictions," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205578, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Frédéric Landy, 2017. "Rescaling the public distribution system in India: Mapping the uneven transition from spatialization to territorialization," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 113-129, February.
    12. Akash Malhotra & Mayank Maloo, 2017. "Understanding food inflation in India: A Machine Learning approach," Papers 1701.08789, arXiv.org.
    13. Kozicka, Marta & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Weber, Regine, 2015. "Public Distribution System vs. Market: Analysis of Staple Food Consumption in India Using QUAIDS with Rationing," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209243, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    14. Marta Kozicka & Dr Matthias Kalkuhl & Jan Brockhaus, 2015. "Food Grain Policies in India and Their Implications for Stocks and Fiscal Costs: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis," EcoMod2015 8377, EcoMod.
    15. Johnson, Deepak, 2018. "Cropping Pattern Changes in Kerala, 1956–57 to 2016–17," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 8(1), July.
    16. Shweta Saini & Ashok Gulati, 2017. "Price Distortions in Indian Agriculture," Working Papers id:12042, eSocialSciences.
    17. Akash Malhotra, 2021. "A hybrid econometric–machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: prioritizing food policy," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 549-581, September.
    18. Singha Mahapatra, Maheswar & Mahanty, Biswajit, 2020. "Policies for managing peak stock of food grains for effective distribution: A case of the Indian food program," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Marta Kozicka & Matthias Kalkuhl & Jan Brockhaus, 2017. "Food Grain Policies in India and their Implications for Stocks and Fiscal Costs: A Dynamic Partial Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 98-122, February.
    20. Downing, Andrea S. & Kumar, Manish & Andersson, August & Causevic, Amar & Gustafsson, Örjan & Joshi, Niraj U. & Krishnamurthy, Chandra Kiran B. & Scholtens, Bert & Crona, Beatrice, 2022. "Unlocking the unsustainable rice-wheat system of Indian Punjab: Assessing alternatives to crop-residue burning from a systems perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fas:journl:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:48-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. VK Ramachandran (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ras.org.in .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.