IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmsjr/498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusive Education Between Humanistic Idea and Corporative Model of Education: Are the Special Schools Better?

Author

Listed:
  • Haris Cerić

    (Prof. dr. Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Sarajevo)

  • Amel Alić

Abstract

In this paper a paradox of global educational politics is problematized (GERM - global education movement) that is reflected in education reforms of numerous countries as it is insisted on uncompromizing introduction of inclusive education, while at the same time, more and more bigger breakthrough of neoliberalism is evident in education. Neoliberal education, that is corporative model of education, based on marketing orientation and imposing the demands for higher academic standards in order schools to be more competitive, is contradictory to humanistic and egalitarian idea of inclusion in education with the final aim of improvement of inclusive education in which all children, young and adults no matter of differencies, are given an opportunity to take part in and to give their own contribution. In practice, it is also questioned the co-existence of inclusive education and corporative model of education along with presenting the reflections and researches of some authors who emphazise the advantages of special education.

Suggested Citation

  • Haris Cerić & Amel Alić, 2020. "Inclusive Education Between Humanistic Idea and Corporative Model of Education: Are the Special Schools Better?," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, May - Aug.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:498
    DOI: 10.26417/717ath95a
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms/article/view/6129
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejms_v5_i2_20/Ceric.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/717ath95a?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Ruggie, 2008. "Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 3(2), pages 189-212, April.
    2. Jędrzej G. Frynas, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Critical Assessment," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 274-281, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ackah-Baidoo, Abigail, 2012. "Enclave development and ‘offshore corporate social responsibility’: Implications for oil-rich sub-Saharan Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 152-159.
    2. Domènec Melé & Carlos Sánchez-Runde, 2013. "Cultural Diversity and Universal Ethics in a Global World," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(4), pages 681-687, September.
    3. Davide Fiaschi & Elisa Giuliani, 2011. "The impact of business on society: exploring CRS adoption and alleged human rights abuses by large corporations," LEM Papers Series 2011/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    4. Florian Wettstein, 2010. "The Duty to Protect: Corporate Complicity, Political Responsibility, and Human Rights Advocacy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 33-47, September.
    5. Graciela Corral de Zubielqui & Howard Harris, 2024. "Why the COVID-19 Crisis Is an Ethical Issue for Business: Evidence from the Australian JobKeeper Initiative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 123-136, February.
    6. Nina Seppala, 2009. "Business and the International Human Rights Regime: A Comparison of UN Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 401-417, August.
    7. Sebastian Vith & Achim Oberg & Markus A. Höllerer & Renate E. Meyer, 2019. "Envisioning the ‘Sharing City’: Governance Strategies for the Sharing Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1023-1046, November.
    8. Jodi L. Short & Michael W. Toffel & Andrea R. Hugill, 2016. "Code Contingencies: Designing Monitoring Regimes to Promote Improvement in Supply Chain Working Conditions," Harvard Business School Working Papers 17-001, Harvard Business School, revised Mar 2019.
    9. Christos Pitelis, 2013. "Towards a More ‘Ethically Correct’ Governance for Economic Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 655-665, December.
    10. Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu & Lite J. Nartey, 2014. "Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1727-1748, December.
    11. Kolk, Ans & van Tulder, Rob, 2010. "International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 119-125, April.
    12. George G. Brenkert, 2019. "Mind the Gap! The Challenges and Limits of (Global) Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 917-930, April.
    13. Yohannes Workeaferahu Elifneh, 2017. "Employees’ Association: A Right or a Privilege? Evidence Based on Employees’ Perspectives Working in Two Multinational Companies in Ethiopia," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 6(4), pages 237-243, November.
    14. Federico Ast, 2019. "The Deliberative Test, a New Procedural Method for Ethical Decision Making in Integrative Social Contracts Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 207-221, March.
    15. Luning, Sabine, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for exploration: Consultants, companies and communities in processes of engagements," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 205-211.
    16. Cecile Renouard, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Utilitarianism, and the Capabilities Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 85-97, January.
    17. Justine Nolan & Luke Taylor, 2009. "Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 433-451, August.
    18. Ioannis Kampourakis, 2021. "Whistleblowers as regulatory intermediaries: Instrumental and reflexive considerations in decentralizing regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 745-759, July.
    19. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje, 2021. "The COVID-19 Pandemic: Female Workers’ Social Sustainability in Global Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Jodi L. Short & Michael W. Toffel & Andrea R. Hugill, 2016. "Monitoring global supply chains," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1878-1897, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmsjr:498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.