IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i2p515-528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the EAEU Deliver External Integration to Business?

Author

Listed:
  • K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz
  • A. Konopelko

Abstract

Purpose: The research aims to analyze the EAEU's abilities to develop business connections as part of external-integration relations. It is to check whether or not free trade agreements and economic cooperation agreements translate into business and economic effects. As the EAEU has its ambition to become a bridge connecting Asia with Europe, the agreements concluded with third countries seem to be part of its strategy to achieve this goal. Due to the above, the research attempts to answer the question about key advantages enabling the creation of such a bridge. It takes into account a vantage the EAEU countries have resulting from their geographical location as well as evaluates skills and possibilities of developing logistics corridors in transcontinental relations, creating appropriate transport infrastructure, logistics centers and comprehensive development of logistics competences. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was carried out with a multi-criteria method using critical literature analysis, logical construct method as well as statistical research. Findings: The research identifies and assesses main business and logistics areas of the EAEU's impact on external-integration in Eurasia. Practical Implications: The areas studied in the article may constitute significant comaparative advantages of the EAEU and affect business relations in Eurasia. Originality/Value: The research concerns a new dimension of external integration of the EAEU. The researched agreements as well as their business and logistic effects can have significant consequences for the whole of Eurasia.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz & A. Konopelko, 2020. "Can the EAEU Deliver External Integration to Business?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 515-528.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:2:p:515-528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1607/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azimzhan Khitakhunov & Bulat Mukhamediyev & Richard Pomfret, 2017. "Eurasian Economic Union: present and future perspectives," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 59-77, February.
    2. Lining He & Faye Duchin, 2009. "Regional Development In China: Interregional Transportation Infrastructure And Regional Comparative Advantage," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 3-22.
    3. Lobyrev, Vitaly & Tikhomirov, Andrey & Tsukarev, Taras & Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2018. "Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments," MPRA Paper 86705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Arvind Panagariya & Jagdish Bhagwati, 1996. "The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 51856, September.
    5. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Katarzyna Czerewacz-Filipowicz & Katarzyna Anna Kuźmicz, 2017. "Comparative analysis of the Eastern European countries as participants of the new silk road," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1212-1227, November.
    6. L. Kostecka-Tomaszewska & K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz, 2019. "Poland – A Gate to the EU or a Bottleneck in the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 472-492.
    7. Angelina A. Kolomeytseva & Maria A. Maksakova, 2019. "Integration Potential in Energy Sector: Eurasian Economic Union Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 174-181.
    8. Stephan Barisitz & Alice Radzyner, 2017. "The New Silk Road, part II: implications for Europe," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q4/17, pages 70-81.
    9. Turovets Yulia & Vishnevskiy Konstantin, 2019. "Patterns of digitalisation in machinery-building industries: evidence from Russia," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 7-22, December.
    10. Agnieszka Konopelko, 2018. "Eurasian Economic Union: a challenge for EU policy towards Kazakhstan," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Kostecka-Tomaszewska & K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz, 2019. "Poland – A Gate to the EU or a Bottleneck in the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 472-492.
    2. Jiandong Ju & Kala Krishna, 2005. "Firm behaviour and market access in a Free Trade Area with rules of origin," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 290-308, February.
    3. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    4. Patrick Messerlin, 2007. "How Much Further Can the WTO Go? Developed Countries Issues," Working Papers hal-00973103, HAL.
    5. Rupa Duttagupta & Arvind Panagariya, 2007. "Free Trade Areas And Rules Of Origin: Economics And Politics," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 169-190, July.
    6. Angelina A. Kolomeytseva, 2020. "Greening of the Manufacturing Industry in the Eurasian Economic Union," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 95-101.
    7. R. M. Melnikov & K. K. Furmanov, 2020. "Evaluating of Impact of Provision of Infrastructure on the Economic Development of Russian Regions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 513-521, October.
    8. Grether, Jean-Marie & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 1998. "Preferential and non-preferential trade flows in world trade," WTO Staff Working Papers ERAD-98-10, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    9. Lucian Cernat, 2001. "ASSESSING REGIONAL TRADE ARRANGEMENTS: ARE SOUTH–SOUTH RTAs MORE TRADE DIVERTING?," International Trade 0109001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Panagariya, A., 1997. "Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 471-489, December.
    11. Barry Eichengreen & Douglas A. Irwin, 2008. "International Economic Policy: Was There a Bush Doctrine?," NBER Working Papers 13831, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Cadot, Olivier & de Melo, Jaime & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2001. "Can bilateralism ease the pains of multilateral trade liberalization?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-44, January.
    13. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2002. "Trade liberalisation and regional integration: the search for large numbers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1-20.
    14. Xiao-guang Zhang & George Verikios, 2006. "Providing Duty-Free Access to Australian Markets for Least-Developed COuntries: a General Equilibrium Analysis," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-09, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    15. Vasilyeva, Olga, 2021. "Agro-food clusters in the Republic of Kazakhstan: assessment and prospects of development," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 34(2), pages 13-20.
    16. Raymond Riezman, 1999. "Can Bilateral Trade Agreements Help Induce Free Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 32(3), pages 751-766, May.
    17. George Manzano & Myrene Bedano, 2011. "Revisiting Sectoral Liberalization: An Alternative to the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific? Implications for the Philippines," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 18(1), pages 73-124, June.
    18. Teh, Robert & Prusa, Thomas J. & Budetta, Michele, 2007. "Trade remedy provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    19. Srinivasan, T.N., 2001. "India's Reform of External Sector Policies and Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Center Discussion Papers 28428, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    20. Valenzuela, Ernesto & Hertel, Thomas W., 2006. "Trade Reforms and Poverty: Are the Impacts Discernable?," Conference papers 331527, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eurasian Economic Union; the EAEU; logistics corridors; external integration.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:2:p:515-528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.