IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jbemgt/v18y2017i6p1212-1227.html

Comparative analysis of the Eastern European countries as participants of the new silk road

Author

Listed:
  • Joanicjusz Nazarko
  • Katarzyna Czerewacz-Filipowicz
  • Katarzyna Anna Kuźmicz

Abstract

The Chinese One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiative often referred to as the New Silk Road (NSR), seems to be the greatest endeavour of our times in terms of economy, politics and logistics. The study aimed to examine the potential of Poland, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Russia to participate in the NSR. The method applied was comparative analysis including both quantitative and qualitative studies. The juxtaposition of data from the intensity of global integration enabled assessment of the potential negative consequences of non-participation of the countries in the NSR. In turn, the analysis of specific indicators of trade integration, the intensity of global integration and the logistics performance of the researched part of Europe has made it possible to answer the question about the most promising variants of the NSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanicjusz Nazarko & Katarzyna Czerewacz-Filipowicz & Katarzyna Anna Kuźmicz, 2017. "Comparative analysis of the Eastern European countries as participants of the new silk road," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1212-1227, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:18:y:2017:i:6:p:1212-1227
    DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2017.1404488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3846/16111699.2017.1404488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3846/16111699.2017.1404488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arvind Panagariya & Jagdish Bhagwati, 1996. "The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 51856, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuzmicz, Katarzyna Anna & Pesch, Erwin, 2019. "Approaches to empty container repositioning problems in the context of Eurasian intermodal transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 194-213.
    2. Karol Tucki & Małgorzata Krzywonos & Olga Orynycz & Adam Kupczyk & Anna Bączyk & Izabela Wielewska, 2021. "Analysis of the Possibility of Fulfilling the Paris Agreement by the Visegrad Group Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Olga Orynycz & Karol Tucki, 2021. "Total Productive Maintenance Approach to an Increase of the Energy Efficiency of a Hotel Facility and Mitigation of Water Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Dezhong Duan & Yang Zhang & Ying Chen & Debin Du, 2019. "Regional Integration in the Inter-City Technology Transfer System of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    6. Jiyong Chen & Dabo Chen & Aiping Yao, 2020. "Trade development between China and countries along the Belt and Road: A spatial econometric analysis based on trade competitiveness and complementarity," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 205-227, May.
    7. K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz & A. Konopelko, 2020. "Can the EAEU Deliver External Integration to Business?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 515-528.
    8. Usman Akbar & József Popp & Hameed Khan & Muhammad Asif Khan & Judit Oláh, 2020. "Energy Efficiency in Transportation along with the Belt and Road Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Olga Orynycz & Karol Tucki & Miron Prystasz, 2020. "Implementation of Lean Management as a Tool for Decrease of Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions in the Fast Food Restaurant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Olga Orynycz & Karol Tucki & Andrzej Wasiak & Robert Sobótka & Arkadiusz Gola, 2019. "Evaluation of the Brake’s Performance Dependence Upon Technical Condition of Car Tires as a Factor of Road Safety Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Claudio Ferrari & Alessio Tei, 2020. "Effects of BRI strategy on Mediterranean shipping transport," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Olga Orynycz & Karol Tucki, 2020. "Technology Management Leading to a Smart System Solution Assuring a Decrease of Energy Consumption in Recreational Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    13. L. Kostecka-Tomaszewska & K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz, 2019. "Poland – A Gate to the EU or a Bottleneck in the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 472-492.
    14. Yang, Dong & Jiang, Liping & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2018. "One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 190-204.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rupa Duttagupta & Arvind Panagariya, 2007. "Free Trade Areas And Rules Of Origin: Economics And Politics," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 169-190, July.
    2. Panagariya, A., 1997. "Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 471-489, December.
    3. Xiao-guang Zhang & George Verikios, 2006. "Providing Duty-Free Access to Australian Markets for Least-Developed COuntries: a General Equilibrium Analysis," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-09, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    4. Teh, Robert & Prusa, Thomas J. & Budetta, Michele, 2007. "Trade remedy provisions in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2007-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Srinivasan, T.N., 2001. "India's Reform of External Sector Policies and Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Center Discussion Papers 28428, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    6. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," CEPR Discussion Papers 1525, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    7. Tokarick, Stephen, 2011. "Should Countries Worry About Immiserizing Growth?," Conference papers 332133, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Kowalski, Przemyslaw, 2008. "Understanding BRIICS’ trade performance: analysis of unobserved heterogeneity in the gravity model of international trade," Conference papers 331690, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 1999. "Trade liberalization and regional integration: the search for large numbers," TMD Discussion Papers 97554, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Maurice Schiff & Yanling Wang, 2004. "Regional Integration And North-South Technology Diffusion: The Case of Nafta," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 283, Central Bank of Chile.
    11. Lee, Jong-Wha & Shin, Kwanho, 2006. "Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 283-301, December.
    12. Satya P. Das & Subhadip Ghosh, 2006. "Endogenous trading bloc formation in a North‐South global economy," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 809-830, August.
    13. Alpay, Savas, 2003. "How Can Trade Liberalization Be Conducive to a Better Environment?," Conference papers 331113, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Demet Yilmazkuday & Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2014. "Bilateral versus Multilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Welfare Analysis," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 513-535, August.
    15. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8226 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Calderon,Cesar & Cantu Canales,Martha Catalina & Zeufack,Albert G., 2020. "Trade Integration, Export Patterns, and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9132, The World Bank.
    17. Lee, Hiro, 2001. "General equilibrium evaluation of Japan-Singapore free trade agreement," MPRA Paper 82605, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. James Cassing, 2006. "Jordan – United States Free Trade Agreement Economic Impact Study: Searching for Effects of the FTA on Exports` Imports and Trade Related Investments," Working Paper 226, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Jan 2006.
    19. Jahangir Khan Achakzai, 2010. "Unilateral Liberalization versus Regional Integration: The Case of ECO Member Countries," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 27-44, Jan-Jun.
    20. Maurice Schiff & Yanling Wang, 2003. "Nafta, Technology Diffusion and Productivity in Mexico," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 40(121), pages 469-476.
    21. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 1999. "After the negotiations: assessing the impact of free trade agreements in Southern Africa," TMD Discussion Papers 97532, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:18:y:2017:i:6:p:1212-1227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TBEM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.