IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v3y2021i3id40816.html

Effect of Wound Infiltration with Bupivacaine after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Monira Parveen

    (Dhaka Dental College, Bangladesh)

  • Dilip Kumar Bhowmick

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Shafiqul Islam

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Sayedur Rahman

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

  • AKM Akhtaruzzaman

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Background and Objective: Adequate post-operative pain management can improve surgical outcome. Patients undergoing surgery can be affected socially, psychologically, economically with undertreated pain. We aimed to evaluate the effect of 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration on postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, satisfaction level, hospital discharge and quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methodology: Fifty eight patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled and randomized in two groups – placebo and intervention. Patients were infiltrated with 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in intervention and 10 ml 0.9% normal saline in placebo group. Post-operative pain was managed with morphine using Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA). Pain intensity was assessed on the matrix of visual analogue scale and verbal rating scale up to 12 post-operative hours. This study also assessed its effect on analgesic requirements, hospital stay, patient satisfaction level after 24hours, pain score on discharge, time taken to return to job and quality of life (on 15th and 30th post-operative day). Results: It was revealed 0.25% bupivacaine can lower post-operative pain up to six post-operative hour of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Total analgesic requirement was also reduced (p= 0.0003) with decreased side effect like vomiting (p= 0.0002). However, satisfaction and quality of life were not affected by bupivacaine infiltration in this study. Conclusion: 0.25% Bupivacaine infiltration offered more effective management of postoperative analgesia with decreased analgesic requirement and less incident of vomiting. But it was not effective after long duration in terms of satisfaction level, hospital discharge, time to return to job or quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Monira Parveen & Dilip Kumar Bhowmick & Md. Shafiqul Islam & Md. Sayedur Rahman & AKM Akhtaruzzaman, 2021. "Effect of Wound Infiltration with Bupivacaine after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized, Controlled Trial," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 3(3), pages 25-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:3:y:2021:i:3:id:40816
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.3.816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/40816
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/40816/9276
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.3.816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:3:y:2021:i:3:id:40816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.