IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eis/articl/222maaly.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What the Analysis of 136 Studies from 1960 to 2020 Tells Us About Comparative Regionalism Studies

Author

Listed:
  • S C A El Maaly

Abstract

In recent years (from the late 1990s to 2020), the number of studies comparing regional integration processes around the world has increased significantly. However, the number of papers aiming to group and analyse these studies in order to determine the main trends in the field is still very limited. We attempt to fill this gap by analysing 136 studies (journal articles, book chapters, institutional reports, working papers, research centre publications and university papers such as dissertations and theses) from 1960 to 2020. In this article, we identify the main terms used in comparative regionalism studies and their evolution. We present the historical development of the field and identify the main organisations that are often compared in these studies. We also present the main points of comparison and the methods used in these studies, and discuss the case of the European integration model in comparative regionalism studies (the n=1 problem). This work creates and analyses one of the largest databases available on comparative regionalism studies. It can therefore facilitate the work of students and researchers interested in comparative regionalism and contribute to the development of this field of research.

Suggested Citation

  • S C A El Maaly, 2022. "What the Analysis of 136 Studies from 1960 to 2020 Tells Us About Comparative Regionalism Studies," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 27(2), pages 31-85, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eis:articl:222maaly
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economicissues.org.uk/Files/2022/EI_Sept2022_maaly.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Widodo, Tri, 2010. "Market Dynamics in the EU, NAFTA, North East Asia and ASEAN: the Method of Constant Market Shares (CMS) Analysis," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 25, pages 480-500.
    2. Mohammad Razaul Karim, 2019. "Same Principles but Different Outcomes of SAARC and ASEAN: Searching Gap," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 60-72, March.
    3. Cobham, David & Robson, Peter, 1994. "Monetary integration in Africa: A deliberately European perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 285-299, March.
    4. Haroldo Ramanzini Júnior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2020. "Regionalism in the Global South: Mercosur and ECOWAS in trade and democracy protection," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1498-1517, September.
    5. Jens-Uwe Wunderlich, 2012. "Comparing regional organisations in global multilateral institutions: ASEAN, the EU and the UN," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 127-143, July.
    6. Nye, J. S., 1970. "Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 796-835, October.
    7. Monika Ewa Kaminska & Jelle Visser, 2011. "The Emergence of Industrial Relations in Regional Trade Blocks — A Comparative Analysis," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 256-281, June.
    8. Marie Lamy & Kai Phua, 2012. "Southeast Asian cooperation in health: a comparative perspective on regional health governance in ASEAN and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 233-250, December.
    9. Evelyn S. Devadason & Shujaat Mubarik, 2020. "ASEAN and the EU: an assessment of interregional trade potentials," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 705-726, July.
    10. Brigitte Weiffen & Leslie Wehner & Detlef Nolte, 2013. "Overlapping regional security institutions in South America: The case of OAS and UNASUR," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 370-389, December.
    11. Rodrigue, Jean-Paul & Notteboom, Theo, 2010. "Comparative North American and European gateway logistics: the regionalism of freight distribution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 497-507.
    12. Haas, Ernst B. & Schmitter, Philippe C., 1964. "Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections About Unity in Latin America," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 705-737, October.
    13. Junichi Goto & Koichi Hamada, 1997. "EU, NAFTA, and Asian Responses: A Perspective from the Calculus of Participation," NBER Chapters, in: Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, pages 91-118, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Ernst B. Haas, 1966. ""The Uniting Of Europe" And The Uniting Of Latin America," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 315-343, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Panke, 2020. "Regional cooperation through the lenses of states: Why do states nurture regional integration?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 475-504, April.
    2. Haroldo Ramanzini Junior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2021. "Regional (dis)integration beyond governments: A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 18-34, March.
    3. Andrés Malamud, 2013. "Overlapping Regionalism, No Integration: Conceptual Issues and the Latin American Experiences," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/20, European University Institute.
    4. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Julián Tole Martínez, 2019. "Colombia entre los TLC y la OMC: ¿liberación o administración del comercio internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1139, October.
    6. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2014. "The Impact of Container Type Diversification on Regional British Port Development Strategies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 583-606, September.
    7. Setyastuti, Rini & Adiningsih, Sri & Widodo, Tri, 2018. "The Dynamics of Comparative Advantage in the ASEAN Region," MPRA Paper 86541, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Andrea Bonilla‐Bolaños, 2021. "A step further in the theory of regional integration: A look at the South American integration strategy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 845-873, July.
    9. Lisa Borgatti, 2011. "Economic Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Marinov, Eduard, 2019. "Африканската Континентална Зона За Свободна Търговия: Защо Африка Се Връща Към Мултилатерализма [The African Continental Free Trade Area]," MPRA Paper 110919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Andrés Malamud & Isabella Alcañiz, 2014. "Managing Security in a Zone of Peace: Brazil’s Soft Approach to Regional Governance," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/50, European University Institute.
    12. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    13. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    14. Andrés Malamud, 2013. "Overlapping Regionalism, No Integration: Conceptual Issues and the Latin American Experiences," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 20, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    15. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) South and South-West (ed.), 2012. "Regional Cooperation for Inclusive and Sustainable Development: South and South-West Asia Development Report 2012-2013," SSWA Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) South and South-West Asia Office, number brr4, May.
    16. Halim, Ronald A. & Kwakkel, Jan H. & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2016. "A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 368-384.
    17. Likun Wang & Anne Goodchild & Yong Wang, 2018. "The effect of distance on cargo flows: a case study of Chinese imports and their hinterland destinations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 456-475, September.
    18. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    19. IORDACHI, Victoria & ROŞCA, Marcelina, 2015. "Implementation Of Financial Derivatives On The Capital Market Of Republic Of Moldova: Challenges And Opportunities," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 2(1), pages 142-151.
    20. Escaith, Hubert, 2021. "Revisiting constant market share analysis: An exercise applied to NAFTA," Estudios y Perspectivas – Sede Subregional de la CEPAL en México 47123, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Comparative regionalism; comparative regional integration; regionalism; regional economic integration; corpus; Cortext Manager;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eis:articl:222maaly. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Wheatley (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsntuuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.