IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v122y2019icp282-294.html

Constraints and opportunities in gender relations: Sugarcane outgrower schemes in Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • Adams, Timothy
  • Gerber, Jean-David
  • Amacker, Michèle

Abstract

Contract farming (CF) is always and inherently a gendered process. This paper unveils the gender dynamics in resource access, use and labour control to show how outgrower CF induces changes, often contradictory engendering processes of production relations. It asks: How does CF influence gender relations in access to land, household labour relations and employment conditions (participation)? Relying on a detailed case study research of a sugarcane CF scheme in Malawi, we show that CF has a complex gendered impact on household’s production relations. CF leads to a masculinization of farm management and ownership together with a feminization of labour. Nevertheless, women translate such labour provision into active participation in decision-making over the use of the cash returns from the CF for better outcome in the household. At the individual level, some can benefit from it; especially women who manage to engage in cane farming are able to attain financial independence and increase their bargaining power within their households. However, such benefits are reserved for households with access to land. Nevertheless, women engagement in cane farming coupled with increased gender awareness through NGOs sensitization is contributing to a change in gendered social perceptions and increased valuation of women abilities in commercial farming, their needs and contributions and may be modifying the gender balance at the community level. We demonstrate that empowering women by making them cane farmers alone is not enough to change women position within their communities, unless community members accompany such empowerment with the recognition and acknowledgement of the women’s contribution. The finding suggests that combining active women participation in outgrower CF with authority enhancing programs through community education whilst creating the possibilities for women to take independent action may be a good way to improve the gender relations between men and women.

Suggested Citation

  • Adams, Timothy & Gerber, Jean-David & Amacker, Michèle, 2019. "Constraints and opportunities in gender relations: Sugarcane outgrower schemes in Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 282-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:282-294
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X19301512
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dell’Angelo, Jampel & D’Odorico, Paolo & Rulli, Maria Cristina & Marchand, Philippe, 2017. "The Tragedy of the Grabbed Commons: Coercion and Dispossession in the Global Land Rush," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Elena Baglioni & Peter Gibbon, 2013. "Land Grabbing, Large- Small-scale Farming: what can evidence and policy from 20th century Africa contribute to the debate?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1558-1581, October.
    3. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2263 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ritu Verma, 2014. "Land Grabs, Power, and Gender in East and Southern Africa: So, What's New?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 52-75, January.
    5. Julia A. Heath & David H. Ciscel, 1988. "Patriarchy, Family Structure and the Exploitation of Women’s Labor," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 781-794, September.
    6. Elizabeth Daley & Sabine Pallas, 2014. "Women and Land Deals in Africa and Asia: Weighing the Implications and Changing the Game," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 178-201, January.
    7. Raynolds, Laura T., 2002. "Wages for Wives: Renegotiating Gender and Production Relations in Contract Farming in the Dominican Republic," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 783-798, May.
    8. Kristina Lanz & Jean‐David Gerber & Tobias Haller, 2018. "Land Grabbing, the State and Chiefs: The Politics of Extending Commercial Agriculture in Ghana," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1526-1552, November.
    9. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & von Braun, Joachim, 2009. ""Land grabbing" by foreign investors in developing countries: Risks and opportunities," Policy briefs 13, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Sam Moyo & Praveen Jha & Paris Yeros, 2013. "The Classical Agrarian Question: Myth, Reality and Relevance Today," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 2(1), pages 93-119, April.
    11. Dzodzi Tsikata & Joseph Awetori Yaro, 2014. "When a Good Business Model is Not Enough: Land Transactions and Gendered Livelihood Prospects in Rural Ghana," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 202-226, January.
    12. Place, Frank & Otsuka, Keijiro, 2001. "Population, Tenure, and Natural Resource Management: The Case of Customary Land Area in Malawi," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 13-32, January.
    13. Cheryl Doss & Gale Summerfield & Dzodzi Tsikata, 2014. "Land, Gender, and Food Security," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Lyn Ossome, 2014. "Can the Law Secure Women's Rights to Land in Africa? Revisiting Tensions Between Culture and Land Commercialization," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 155-177, January.
    15. Collier, Paul & Dercon, Stefan, 2014. "African Agriculture in 50Years: Smallholders in a Rapidly Changing World?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 92-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sajitha Dishanka & Takeshi Sakurai & Yukio Ikemoto, 2022. "Equity and Efficiency in Women-Empowered Contract Farming: An Explanatory Case Study on the Tea Estate Sector of Sri Lanka," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 13(6), pages 40-54.
    2. Cheryl Doss & Charles Gottlieb, 2025. "Gendered Patterns of Labor in Agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 431-445, May.
    3. Rebekah G. K. Hinton & Christopher J. A. Macleod & Mads Troldborg & Gift Wanangwa & Modesta Kanjaye & Emma Mbalame & Prince Mleta & Kettie Harawa & Steve Kumwenda & Robert M. Kalin, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Awareness and Adoption of Borehole-Garden Permaculture in Malawi: Lessons for the Promotion of Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Ali,Daniel Ayalew & Deininger,Klaus W., 2021. "Does Title Increase Large Farm Productivity ? Institutional Determinants of Large Land-BasedInvestments’ Performance in Zambia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9702, The World Bank.
    5. repec:ags:cfcp15:344339 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Leonard Itayi Chirenje & Geetha Mohan & Osamu Saito, 2025. "Exploring the nexus of land use transitions and community livelihoods: a causal loop perspective," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus, 2022. "Institutional determinants of large land-based investments’ performance in Zambia: Does title enhance productivity and structural transformation?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Bahati, Ibrahim & Martiniello, Giuliano & Abebe, Gumataw Kifle, 2022. "The implications of sugarcane contract farming on land rights, labor, and food security in the Bunyoro sub-region, Uganda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Freddy Ruzhani & Mushunje Abbyssinia, 2022. "Perceptions of Small-Scale Farmers on Tobacco Contract Farming: The Case of Marondera Rural District, Zimbabwe," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(3), pages 1-10.
    10. Neida Albornoz-Arias & Camila Rojas-Sanguino & Akever-Karina Santafe-Rojas, 2025. "Rural Women’s Leadership Within the Cocoa Production Chain in Tibú, Norte de Santander, Colombia: A Gender Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Paola Belingheri & Filippo Chiarello & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon & Paola Rovelli, 2021. "Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    12. Ambler, Kate & Jones, Kelly & O'Sullivan, Michael, 2021. "Facilitating women’s access to an economic empowerment initiative: Evidence from Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Yang & Jun He, 2021. "Global Land Grabbing: A Critical Review of Case Studies across the World," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus, 2022. "Institutional determinants of large land-based investments’ performance in Zambia: Does title enhance productivity and structural transformation?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Xia, Fang, 2018. "Assessing the long-term performance of large-scale land transfers: Challenges and opportunities in Malawi’s estate sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 281-296.
    4. Christoph Oberlack & Markus Giger & Ward Anseeuw & Camilla Adelle & Magalie Bourblanc & Perrine Burnod & Sandra Eckert & Wegayehu Fitawek & Eve Fouilleux & Sheryl Hendriks & Boniface Kiteme & Livhuwan, 2021. "Why do large-scale agricultural investments induce different socio-economic, food security, and environmental impacts? Evidence from Kenya, Madagascar, and Mozambique," Post-Print hal-03419337, HAL.
    5. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    6. Ernest Nkansah‐Dwamena & Hyunsoo Yoon, 2022. "Why is sub‐Saharan Africa an attractive destination to foreign land grabbers? Evidence from country characteristics," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(2), pages 280-292, June.
    7. Imren Borsuk, 2023. "Gendered dispossession and women’s changing poverty by slum/squatter redevelopment projects: A case study from Turkey," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(5), pages 1190-1206, August.
    8. Fonjong, Lotsmart N & Gyapong, Adwoa Y, 2021. "Plantations, women, and food security in Africa: Interrogating the investment pathway towards zero hunger in Cameroon and Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives in Nigeria and Rural Women Livestock Keepers in Oil Host Communities," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 18/060, African Governance and Development Institute..
    10. Wenrong Qian & Dandan Li & Xinjie Shi, 2025. "Competitive or crowding‐out? Estimating spillover effects from large‐scale farms on smallholders in China," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 27-44, January.
    11. Sändig, Jan, 2021. "Contesting large-scale land acquisitions in the Global South," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    12. Nanhthavong, Vong & Bieri, Sabin & Nguyen, Anh-Thu & Hett, Cornelia & Epprecht, Michael, 2022. "Proletarianization and gateways to precarization in the context of land-based investments for agricultural commercialization in Lao PDR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Kumeh, Eric Mensah & Kyereh, Boateng & Birkenberg, Athena & Birner, Regina, 2021. "Customary power, farmer strategies and the dynamics of access to protected forestlands for farming: Implications for Ghana's forest bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. İnan, Canan Emek & Albulut, Koray, 2022. "Linking actors and scales by green grabbing in Bozbük and Kazıklı," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Gyapong, Adwoa Yeboah, 2020. "How and why large scale agricultural land investments do not create long-term employment benefits: A critique of the ‘state’ of labour regulations in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Doss, Cheryl & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 2020. "Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Hambloch, Caroline, 2022. "Land formalization turned land rush: The case of oil palm in Papua New Guinea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Alhola, Sara & Gwaindepi, Abel, 2024. "Land tenure formalisation and perceived tenure security: Two decades of the land administration project in Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. Manda, S. & Tallontire, A. & Dougill, A.J., 2020. "Outgrower schemes and sugar value-chains in Zambia: Rethinking determinants of rural inclusion and exclusion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Deininger, Klaus W. & Xia, Fang, "undated". "Assessing Impacts of Large Scale Land Transfers: Challenges and Opportunities in Malawi’s Estate Sector," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258112, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:282-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.