IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v35y2014icp358-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing optimal bunkering ports for liner shipping companies: A hybrid Fuzzy-Delphi–TOPSIS approach

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ying
  • Yeo, Gi-Tae
  • Ng, Adolf K.Y.

Abstract

With sustained high bunker prices, new methods for choosing optimal bunkering ports to save on total operating costs have appeared in research involving liner shipping companies. Generally speaking, the bunkering port selection problem is solved by utilizing ship planning software. However, this can only work optimally when ship arrivals can be forecasted rather accurately, and its primary limitation is that it ignores unforeseen circumstances in actual operations. There are as yet no fixed rules for bunkering port selection. To address this, the paper develops a benchmarking framework that evaluates bunkering ports’ performances with in regular liner routes in order to choose optimal ones. Bunkering port selection is typically a multi-criteria group decision problem, and in many practical situations, decision makers cannot form proper judgments using incomplete and uncertain information in an environment with exact and crisp values; thus, fuzzy numbers are proposed in this paper. A hybrid Fuzzy-Delphi–TOPSIS based methodology that divides the benchmarking into three stages is employed to support the entire framework. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is performed. The proposed framework can enable decision makers to better understand the complex relationships of the relevant key performance factors and assist managers in comprehending the present strengths and weaknesses of their strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ying & Yeo, Gi-Tae & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2014. "Choosing optimal bunkering ports for liner shipping companies: A hybrid Fuzzy-Delphi–TOPSIS approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 358-365.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:35:y:2014:i:c:p:358-365
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X14000961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.04.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Liner ship fleet deployment with container transshipment operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 470-484.
    2. Acosta, Manuel & Coronado, Daniel & Del Mar Cerban, Ma, 2011. "Bunkering competition and competitiveness at the ports of the Gibraltar Strait," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 911-916.
    3. John Dinwoodie & Sarah Tuck & Harriet Knowles & James Benhin & Mark Sansom, 2012. "Sustainable Development of Maritime Operations in Ports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 111-126, February.
    4. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Robust schedule design for liner shipping services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1093-1106.
    5. Huang, Shell Ying & Hsu, Wen Jing & He, Yuxiong, 2011. "Assessing capacity and improving utilization of anchorages," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 216-227, March.
    6. Mohammad Mazraati, 2011. "Challenges and prospects of international marine bunker fuels demand," OPEC Energy Review, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, vol. 35(1), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Koi Yu (Adolf) Ng, 2006. "Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transhipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(3), pages 234-250, September.
    8. Omar Besbes & Sergei Savin, 2009. "Going Bunkers: The Joint Route Selection and Refueling Problem," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 694-711, February.
    9. Du, Yuquan & Chen, Qiushuang & Quan, Xiongwen & Long, Lei & Fung, Richard Y.K., 2011. "Berth allocation considering fuel consumption and vessel emissions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1021-1037.
    10. Qi, Xiangtong & Song, Dong-Ping, 2012. "Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 863-880.
    11. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Liner ship route schedule design with sea contingency time and port time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 615-633.
    12. Meng, Qiang & Wang, Shuaian, 2012. "Liner ship fleet deployment with week-dependent container shipment demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 241-252.
    13. Notteboom, Theo E. & Vernimmen, Bert, 2009. "The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 325-337.
    14. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 701-714.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Raimonds Aronietis & Christa Sys & Edwin van Hassel & Thierry Vanelslander, 2017. "Investigating the bunkering choice determinants: the case of the port of Antwerp," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Peng, Peng & Yang, Yu & Lu, Feng & Cheng, Shifen & Mou, Naixia & Yang, Ren, 2018. "Modelling the competitiveness of the ports along the Maritime Silk Road with big data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 852-867.
    4. Abdy Kurniawan & Gunung Hutapea & Sri Hardianto & I Ketut Suhartana & Apri Yuliani & Teguh Pairunan Putra & Wilmar Jonris Siahaan & Kamarul Hidayat & Windra Priatna Humang & Chairul Paotonan & Daeng P, 2022. "Finding a New Home: Rerouting of Ferry Ships from Merak–Bakauheni to East Indonesian Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Sedat Baştuğ & Hercules Haralambides & Soner Esmer & Enes Eminoğlu, 2021. "Port competitiveness: Do container terminal operators and liner shipping companies see eye to eye?," Post-Print hal-04046233, HAL.
    6. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    7. Eisuke Watanabe & Ryuichi Shibasaki, 2023. "Extraction of Bunkering Services from Automatic Identification System Data and Their International Comparisons," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Wei-Ming Wang & Hsiao-Han Peng, 2020. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Urban Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Patyal, Vishal Singh & Kumar, Ravi & Kushwah, Shiksha, 2021. "Modeling barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: An Indian perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Seo, Young-Joon & Park, Jin Suk, 2016. "The estimation of minimum efficient scale of the port industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 168-175.
    11. Yang, Yi-Chih & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2016. "Determinants of global logistics hub ports: Comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 179-189.
    12. Wen-Chin Chen & Hui-Pin Chang & Kuan-Ming Lin & Neng-Hao Kan, 2015. "An Efficient Model for NPD Performance Evaluation Using DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP—Applied to the TFT-LCD Touch Panel Industry in Taiwan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Amy H. I. Lee & He-Yau Kang, 2024. "A Model for Developing a Mobile Payment Service Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akyüz, M. Hakan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2016. "Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-71.
    2. Wang, Hua & Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2014. "Simultaneous optimization of schedule coordination and cargo allocation for liner container shipping networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 261-273.
    3. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Robust bunker management for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 789-797.
    4. Zhao, Shuaiqi & Yang, Hualong & Zheng, Jianfeng & Li, Dechang, 2024. "A two-step approach for deploying heterogeneous vessels and designing reliable schedule in liner shipping services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Zhang, Abraham & Zheng, Zhichao & Teo, Chung-Piaw, 2022. "Schedule reliability in liner shipping timetable design: A convex programming approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 499-525.
    6. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2013. "Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-62.
    7. Chen, Kang & Chen, Dongxu & Sun, Xueshan & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2016. "Container Ocean-transportation System Design with the factors of demand fluctuation and choice inertia of shippers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 267-281.
    8. Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Xinchang, 2016. "A polynomial-time algorithm for sailing speed optimization with containership resource sharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 394-405.
    9. Manuel Herrera & Per J. Agrell & Casiano Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate & Lourdes Trujillo, 2017. "Vessel capacity restrictions in the fleet deployment problem: an application to the Panama Canal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(2), pages 845-869, June.
    10. Ksciuk, Jana & Kuhlemann, Stefan & Tierney, Kevin & Koberstein, Achim, 2023. "Uncertainty in maritime ship routing and scheduling: A Literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 499-524.
    11. Meng, Qiang & Du, Yuquan & Wang, Yadong, 2016. "Shipping log data based container ship fuel efficiency modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 207-229.
    12. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2013. "Containership scheduling with transit-time-sensitive container shipment demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 68-83.
    13. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Bell, Michael G.H., 2013. "Liner ship route capacity utilization estimation with a bounded polyhedral container shipment demand pattern," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 57-76.
    14. Xi Jiang & Haijun Mao & Yadong Wang & Hao Zhang, 2020. "Liner Shipping Schedule Design for Near-Sea Routes Considering Big Customers’ Preferences on Ship Arrival Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Dulebenets, Maxim A. & Ozguven, Eren Erman, 2017. "Vessel scheduling in liner shipping: Modeling transport of perishable assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 141-156.
    16. Dulebenets, Maxim A., 2018. "A comprehensive multi-objective optimization model for the vessel scheduling problem in liner shipping," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 293-318.
    17. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    18. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Liner ship route schedule design with sea contingency time and port time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 615-633.
    19. Zhen, Lu & Shen, Tao & Wang, Shuaian & Yu, Shucheng, 2016. "Models on ship scheduling in transshipment hubs with considering bunker cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 111-121.
    20. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2013. "Container routing in liner shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-7.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:35:y:2014:i:c:p:358-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.