Author
Listed:
- Zhou, Tuqiang
- Li, Qiuyi
- Wang, Rong
- Sun, Yifan
- Zhang, Saifei
Abstract
The congestion and time loss caused by expressway accidents are significant, and existing studies have not fully explored the differences and mechanisms of drivers' adaptive behaviors before, and during expressway driving. Based on 30,000 decision choices from 2500 drivers in western Japan, this study uses latent class analysis (LCA), XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting), and discrete choice model (DCM) to identify key influencing factors, compare model performance, and make policy recommendations. The LCA divided drivers into three categories; Results of XGBoost shows that there are significant differences in the importance of factors such as age, trip purpose, and accident clearance time among different scenarios and driver groups, and the model outperformed DCMs in the individual cluster analysis, with cluster 3 achieving a prediction accuracy of 61.1 % (area under the curve value); and SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanation) analysis indicates that information accuracy, alternative expressways and queue dynamics are dominative factors affecting Cluster 1, 2 and 3 respectively by using important features, and young drivers are more sensitive to real-time information than middle-aged and older drivers, and commuters are significantly more inclined to change routes than leisure travelers (P < 0.01). It is recommended to strengthen visual early warning for low-sensitivity groups, provide accident details for safety-priority groups, optimize the layout of expressway entrances and exits, and implement hierarchical information release based on age and travel purpose. This study provides an empirical basis for the design and policy formulation of dynamic transportation systems across scenarios and clusters.
Suggested Citation
Zhou, Tuqiang & Li, Qiuyi & Wang, Rong & Sun, Yifan & Zhang, Saifei, 2025.
"Exploring effects of expressway accident on drivers’ adaptive behavior in different scenarios: A comparative evaluation of machine learning techniques and discrete choice models,"
Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003671
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103824
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.