IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v174y2025ics0967070x25003671.html

Exploring effects of expressway accident on drivers’ adaptive behavior in different scenarios: A comparative evaluation of machine learning techniques and discrete choice models

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Tuqiang
  • Li, Qiuyi
  • Wang, Rong
  • Sun, Yifan
  • Zhang, Saifei

Abstract

The congestion and time loss caused by expressway accidents are significant, and existing studies have not fully explored the differences and mechanisms of drivers' adaptive behaviors before, and during expressway driving. Based on 30,000 decision choices from 2500 drivers in western Japan, this study uses latent class analysis (LCA), XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting), and discrete choice model (DCM) to identify key influencing factors, compare model performance, and make policy recommendations. The LCA divided drivers into three categories; Results of XGBoost shows that there are significant differences in the importance of factors such as age, trip purpose, and accident clearance time among different scenarios and driver groups, and the model outperformed DCMs in the individual cluster analysis, with cluster 3 achieving a prediction accuracy of 61.1 % (area under the curve value); and SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanation) analysis indicates that information accuracy, alternative expressways and queue dynamics are dominative factors affecting Cluster 1, 2 and 3 respectively by using important features, and young drivers are more sensitive to real-time information than middle-aged and older drivers, and commuters are significantly more inclined to change routes than leisure travelers (P < 0.01). It is recommended to strengthen visual early warning for low-sensitivity groups, provide accident details for safety-priority groups, optimize the layout of expressway entrances and exits, and implement hierarchical information release based on age and travel purpose. This study provides an empirical basis for the design and policy formulation of dynamic transportation systems across scenarios and clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Tuqiang & Li, Qiuyi & Wang, Rong & Sun, Yifan & Zhang, Saifei, 2025. "Exploring effects of expressway accident on drivers’ adaptive behavior in different scenarios: A comparative evaluation of machine learning techniques and discrete choice models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003671
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003671
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izdebski, Mariusz & Jacyna-Gołda, Ilona & Gołda, Paweł, 2022. "Minimisation of the probability of serious road accidents in the transport of dangerous goods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Ben-Elia, Eran & Shiftan, Yoram, 2010. "Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 249-264, May.
    3. Zheng, Yunan, 2007. "A preliminary evaluation of the impact of local accident information on the public perception of road safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1170-1182.
    4. Wang, Bobin & Shao, Chunfu & Li, Juan & Weng, Jinxian & Ji, Xun, 2015. "Holiday travel behavior analysis and empirical study under integrated multimodal travel information service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 21-36.
    5. Nagatani, Takashi, 2022. "Dynamic transition induced by route choice in two-route traffic network with onramp," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 596(C).
    6. Zhao, Wenjing & Ma, Zhuanglin & Yang, Kui & Huang, Helai & Monsuur, Fredrik & Lee, Jaeyoung, 2020. "Impacts of variable message signs on en-route route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 335-349.
    7. Bijmolt, T.H.A. & Paas, L.J. & Vermunt, J.K., 2004. "Country and consumer segmentation : Multi-level latent class analysis of financial product ownership," Other publications TiSEM fb506162-d125-4091-9083-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Li, Tianhao & Chen, Peng & Tian, Ye, 2021. "Personalized incentive-based peak avoidance and drivers’ travel time-savings," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 68-80.
    9. Wijayaratna, Kasun P. & Dixit, Vinayak V., 2016. "Impact of information on risk attitudes: Implications on valuation of reliability and information," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 16-34.
    10. Yao, Mingzhu & Wang, Donggen, 2018. "Mobility and travel behavior in urban China: The role of institutional factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 122-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Jianhua & Zhang, Yongqing, 2020. "Valuation of travel time reliability: Considering the traveler's adaptive expectation with an indifference band on daily trip duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 337-353.
    2. Ioannis Politis & Georgios Georgiadis & Aristomenis Kopsacheilis & Anastasia Nikolaidou & Chrysanthi Sfyri & Socrates Basbas, 2023. "A Route Choice Model for the Investigation of Drivers’ Willingness to Choose a Flyover Motorway in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Han, Xiao & Yang, Yong & Jiang, Rui & Gao, Zi-You & Zhang, H. Michael, 2025. "Commuting departure time choice under stochastic demand: Departure preferences and the value of information," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Schwanen, Tim, 2020. "Towards decolonial human subjects in research on transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Zhang, Tong & Li, Dawei & Huang, Hongfei & Chen, Xianlong & Chen, Zhuo, 2026. "Optimizing platform subsidy strategies in the MaaS era: Employing a mixed equilibrium dynamic traffic assignment framework with route choice rights game," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Jacqueline Arriagada & C. Angelo Guevara & Marcela Munizaga & Song Gao, 2025. "An experiential learning-based transit route choice model using large-scale smart-card data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1543-1568, August.
    7. Marko Renčelj & Osman Lindov & Miloš Pljakić & Drago Sever, 2025. "Assessment of Dangerous Goods Transport: Case Western Balkan Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Guevara, C. Angelo & Tang, Yue & Gao, Song, 2018. "The initial condition problem with complete history dependency in learning models for travel choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 850-861.
    9. Fang, Lan & Quan, Yurong & Mao, Hui & Chen, Shaojian, 2022. "The Information Communication Technology and Off-farm Employment of Rural Laborers: An Analysis Based on the Micro Data of China Family Panel Studies," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322088, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Emilian Szczepański & Renata Żochowska & Mariusz Izdebski & Marianna Jacyna, 2025. "Decision-Making Problems in Urban Transport Decarbonization Strategies: Challenges, Tools, and Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Arriagada, Jacqueline & Prato, Carlo & Munizaga, Marcela, 2025. "Incorporating the inertia effect into a route choice model using fare transaction data from a large-scale public transport network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Ekkapong Cheunkamon & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2020. "Determinant Factors Influencing Thai Tourists’ Intentions to Use Social Media for Travel Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Tian, Ye & Li, Yudi & Sun, Jian, 2022. "Stick or carrot for traffic demand management? Evidence from experimental economics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 235-254.
    14. Natalia Casado-Sanz & Begoña Guirao & Maria Attard, 2020. "Analysis of the Risk Factors Affecting the Severity of Traffic Accidents on Spanish Crosstown Roads: The Driver’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Yuntao Guo & Srinivas Peeta & Shubham Agrawal & Irina Benedyk, 2022. "Impacts of Pokémon GO on route and mode choice decisions: exploring the potential for integrating augmented reality, gamification, and social components in mobile apps to influence travel decisions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 395-444, April.
    16. Kunbo Shi & Long Cheng & Jonas De Vos & Yongchun Yang & Wanpeng Cao & Frank Witlox, 2021. "How does purchasing intangible services online influence the travel to consume these services? A focus on a Chinese context," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2605-2625, October.
    17. Soriguera, Francesc, 2014. "On the value of highway travel time information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 294-310.
    18. Yang, Shan & Liu, Yang, 2024. "Markov game for CV joint adaptive routing in stochastic traffic networks: A scalable learning approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Jou, Rong-Chang & Chen, Ke-Hong, 2013. "An application of cumulative prospect theory to freeway drivers’ route choice behaviours," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 123-131.
    20. Hu, Songhua & Xiong, Chenfeng & Ji, Ya & Wu, Xin & Liu, Kailun & Schonfeld, Paul, 2024. "Understanding factors influencing user engagement in incentive-based travel demand management program," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:174:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.