IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v165y2025icp97-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating utility-based walking accessibility: New versus old development areas in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jiaqi
  • Liang, Zheng
  • Huai, Yue
  • Lo, Hong K.

Abstract

Walking accessibility is a fundamental component of urban design, which plays a significant role in creating livable, sustainable and inclusive cities. This study aims to investigate potential disparities in walking accessibility between new and old development areas. To achieve this, a utility-based walking accessibility measure is developed, incorporating the impacts of street-level walking attributes, the spatial distribution of points of interest (POIs), pedestrians' heterogeneous behavioral preferences and population distribution. Walking accessibility disparity or inequity among different age groups is further quantified using Gini coefficients and Theil indices. The comparative case study focuses on Kwun Tong, an old urban area, and Kai Tak, a new development area in Hong Kong. The results show that the new development area exhibits lower walking accessibility across all age groups and a higher level of inequity for young and middle-aged pedestrians compared to the old development area, while the inequity difference for the elderly is not significant. This disparity can be attributed to the concentration of POIs within a few business clusters and insufficient pedestrian facilities. Additionally, the elderly have the worst walking accessibility among the three age groups. The findings highlight the necessity to incorporate pedestrians’ diverse preferences in planning new development areas to create a pedestrian-friendly environment for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jiaqi & Liang, Zheng & Huai, Yue & Lo, Hong K., 2025. "Investigating utility-based walking accessibility: New versus old development areas in Hong Kong," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 97-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:165:y:2025:i:c:p:97-106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000617
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:165:y:2025:i:c:p:97-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.