IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v155y2024icp150-160.html

How to apply the four-step model for 150,000 travel zones: The HIPAT model

Author

Listed:
  • Ihrig, Jan
  • Jochem, Patrick
  • Szimba, Eckhard

Abstract

Current European transport demand models following the classical four-step approach are less suitable for analysing the traffic volumes on inter-regional road infrastructure with relevant demand of regional trips, as they consider only about 10% of the trip demand with passenger cars. Mainly due to runtime problems, these models are limited to operation at the NUTS-3 level. This level comprises around 1500 regions for Europe with an average diameter of about 50km. However, more than 90% of the trips are shorter than 50km and are, therefore, not adequately considered in the trip distribution model and the trip matrix. Computing this matrix at a higher spatial resolution, such as the LAU-2 level, is not possible as the runtime of the overall model and the size of the trip matrix increase quadratically with the number of travel zones. In the HIPAT model, this obstacle is overcome by an innovative concept operating at different hierarchical levels. This reduces the complexity of the trip matrix, such that the HIPAT model can be applied at large scale for 150,000 travel zones without any runtime problems. This is demonstrated by a prototype implementation for a case study that handles 33,000 travel zones in two minutes. In addition, the limitations of applying NUTS-3-based travel zones for transport modelling are shown: 94.6% of the trips are shorter than the average diameter of the travel zones (50km) and are therefore not correctly represented by the model. Smaller travel zones decrease this number and provide a better basis for analysing infrastructure policies and, ultimately, for decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Ihrig, Jan & Jochem, Patrick & Szimba, Eckhard, 2024. "How to apply the four-step model for 150,000 travel zones: The HIPAT model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 150-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:155:y:2024:i:c:p:150-160
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.06.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400177X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaudry, M. & Mandel, B. & Rothengatter, W., 1994. "Introducing Spatial Competition Through an Autoregressive Continunous Distributed (AR-C-D) Process in Intercity Generation-Distribution Models within a Quasi-Direct Format (QDF)," Cahiers de recherche 9412, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    2. Panayotis Christidis & Juan Nicolás Ibanez Rivas, 2012. "Measuring road congestion," JRC Research Reports JRC69961, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Staffan Algers & Jonas Eliasson & Lars-Göran Mattsson, 2005. "Is it time to use activity-based urban transport models? A discussion of planning needs and modelling possibilities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 39(4), pages 767-789, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Els Hannes & Diana Kusumastuti & Maikel Espinosa & Davy Janssens & Koen Vanhoof & Geert Wets, 2012. "Mental maps and travel behaviour: meanings and models," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 143-165, April.
    2. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Electric cargo cycles - A comprehensive review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 278-303.
    3. Teng Zhong & Guonian Lü & Xiuming Zhong & Haoming Tang & Yu Ye, 2020. "Measuring Human-Scale Living Convenience through Multi-Sourced Urban Data and a Geodesign Approach: Buildings as Analytical Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2020. "MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    5. Rifki, Omar & Chiabaut, Nicolas & Solnon, Christine, 2020. "On the impact of spatio-temporal granularity of traffic conditions on the quality of pickup and delivery optimal tours," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Yves Sprumont, 1998. "On the Game-Theoretic Structure of Public-Good Economies," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 26(4), pages 455-472.
    7. Marlies Vanhulsel & Carolien Beckx & Davy Janssens & Koen Vanhoof & Geert Wets, 2011. "Measuring dissimilarity of geographically dispersed space–time paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 65-79, January.
    8. Ben-Dor, Golan & Ogulenko, Aleksey & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2024. "Simulation-based policy evaluation of monetary car driving disincentives in Jerusalem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Marie Briguglio & Glenn Formosa, 2023. "Sharing Is Caring: An Economic Analysis of Consumer Engagement in an Electric Vehicle Sharing Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Andrew Daly, 2013. "Forecasting behaviour: with applications to transport," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Choice Modelling, chapter 2, pages 48-72, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Dimitrios Rizopoulos & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2020. "A Method for the Optimization of Daily Activity Chains Including Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Schubert, Daniel & Sys, Christa & Vanelslander, Thierry & Roumboutsos, Athena, 2022. "No-queue road pricing: A comprehensive policy instrument for Europe?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Chang, Yu Sang & Lee, Yong Joo & Choi, Sung Sup Brian, 2017. "Is there more traffic congestion in larger cities? -Scaling analysis of the 101 largest U.S. urban centers-," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 54-63.
    14. Miquel-Ángel Garcia-López & Ilias Pasidis & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2015. "Express delivery to the suburbs. The effects of transportation in Europe’s heterogeneous cities," Working Papers 2015/30, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    15. Chen Weng & Jingyi Wang & Chunming Li & Rencai Dong & Chencan Lv & Yaran Jiao & Yonglin Zhang, 2022. "Recreational Green Space Service in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area: A Multiple Travel Modes Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Vandyck, Toon & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2018. "Regional labor markets, commuting, and the economic impact of road pricing," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 217-236.
    17. Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Yang, Yongchun & Witlox, Frank, 2019. "Does e-shopping replace shopping trips? Empirical evidence from Chengdu, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 21-33.
    18. Aris Christodoulou & Panayotis Christidis, 2020. "Measuring congestion in European cities: A focus on Brussels, Seville and Krakow," JRC Research Reports JRC118448, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Moya-Gómez, Borja & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2017. "The impacts of congestion on automobile accessibility. What happens in large European cities?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 148-159.
    20. Frederik Priem & Philip Stessens & Frank Canters, 2020. "Microsimulation of Residential Activity for Alternative Urban Development Scenarios: A Case Study on Brussels and Flemish Brabant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:155:y:2024:i:c:p:150-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.