IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v132y2023icp163-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Container terminal daily gate in and gate out forecasting using machine learning methods

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Jiahuan
  • Ma, Mingyu
  • Jin, Huan
  • Cui, Tianxiang
  • Bai, Ruibin

Abstract

Container throughput is an essential indicator for measuring the container terminal’s efficiency. Gate in and gate out containers are the containers that are transported to and transported out of the terminal respectively. Containers are stacked in the container yard before they leave the terminal. Handling of these containers accounts for a major workload at the terminal. Therefore, accurate short-term forecasting of the daily gate in and gate out containers at a container terminal is critical for operational planning. While most forecasts are made for the strategical level of the overall container throughput, this paper focuses on the daily gate in and gate out container quantities with a case study of Ningbo Zhoushan Port Beilun Second Container Terminal. Traditional approaches are mainly time series prediction algorithms that purely rely on the previously observed values. This paper proposes a novel decomposition-ensemble methodology framework which first divides the daily forecasting into a group of forecasting on a set of vessels which arrive in a certain time range around the predicted day. A novel machine learning method, “Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost)”, is used for the vessel level of forecasting, where some temporal-related features of vessels are considered in the model. We then ensemble the predicated value of all vessels in the set as the total gate in/out amount for a day. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method achieves notable performance gains compared to the time series-based method ARIMA. In addition, the results of this new technology can be fed into the terminal operating system (ToS) in the Ningbo Beilun container terminal for better management. Specifically, the prediction results facilitate effective real-time decision-making for operational management and policy drafting, such as workload planning, equipment scheduling, yard planning, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Jiahuan & Ma, Mingyu & Jin, Huan & Cui, Tianxiang & Bai, Ruibin, 2023. "Container terminal daily gate in and gate out forecasting using machine learning methods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 163-174.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:132:y:2023:i:c:p:163-174
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.11.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X22003225
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.11.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gang Xie & Yatong Qian & Hewei Yang, 2019. "Forecasting container throughput based on wavelet transforms within a decomposition-ensemble methodology: a case study of China," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 178-200, February.
    2. Brian Levine & Linda Nozick & Dean Jones, 2009. "Estimating an Origin-Destination Table for US Exports of Waterborne Containerised Freight," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(2), pages 137-155, June.
    3. Yanjie Zhou & Kap Hwan Kim, 2021. "Optimal concession contract between a port authority and container-terminal operators by revenue-sharing schemes with quantity discount," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 1010-1031, October.
    4. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    5. Ümit Gökkuş & Mehmet Sinan Yıldırım & Metin Mutlu Aydin, 2017. "Estimation of Container Traffic at Seaports by Using Several Soft Computing Methods: A Case of Turkish Seaports," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, March.
    6. Twrdy, Elen & Batista, Milan, 2016. "Modeling of container throughput in Northern Adriatic ports over the period 1990–2013," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 131-142.
    7. King-Fai Fung, 2001. "Competition between the ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: a structural vector error correction model to forecast the demand for container handling services," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 3-22, January.
    8. Tang, Ling & Yu, Lean & Wang, Shuai & Li, Jianping & Wang, Shouyang, 2012. "A novel hybrid ensemble learning paradigm for nuclear energy consumption forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 432-443.
    9. Feng-Ming Tsai & Linda J.W. Huang, 2017. "Using artificial neural networks to predict container flows between the major ports of Asia," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 5001-5010, September.
    10. Petering, Matthew E.H., 2009. "Effect of block width and storage yard layout on marine container terminal performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 591-610, July.
    11. Paflioti, Persa & Vitsounis, Thomas K. & Teye, Collins & Bell, Michael G.H. & Tsamourgelis, Ioannis, 2017. "Box dynamics: A sectoral approach to analyse containerized port throughput interdependencies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 396-413.
    12. Sushil Punia & Konstantinos Nikolopoulos & Surya Prakash Singh & Jitendra K. Madaan & Konstantia Litsiou, 2020. "Deep learning with long short-term memory networks and random forests for demand forecasting in multi-channel retail," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(16), pages 4964-4979, July.
    13. Rashed, Yasmine & Meersman, Hilde & Sys, Christa & Van de Voorde, Eddy & Vanelslander, Thierry, 2018. "A combined approach to forecast container throughput demand: Scenarios for the Hamburg-Le Havre range of ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 127-141.
    14. Peter Schulze & Alexander Prinz, 2009. "Forecasting container transshipment in Germany," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(22), pages 2809-2815.
    15. Levine, Brian & Nozick, Linda & Jones, Dean, 2009. "Estimating an origin-destination table for US imports of waterborne containerized freight," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 611-626, July.
    16. M. Milenković & N. Milosavljevic & N. Bojović & S. Val, 2021. "Container flow forecasting through neural networks based on metaheuristics," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 965-997, June.
    17. Vonck, Indra & Notteboom, Theo, 2016. "Panarchy within a port setting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 308-315.
    18. Gu Pang & Bartosz Gebka, 2017. "Forecasting container throughput using aggregate or terminal-specific data? The case of Tanjung Priok Port, Indonesia," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(9), pages 2454-2469, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Dong & Grifoll, Manel & Sanchez-Espigares, Jose A. & Zheng, Pengjun & Feng, Hongxiang, 2022. "Hybrid approaches for container traffic forecasting in the context of anomalous events: The case of the Yangtze River Delta region in the COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Feng, Hongxiang & Grifoll, Manel & Zheng, Pengjun, 2019. "From a feeder port to a hub port: The evolution pathways, dynamics and perspectives of Ningbo-Zhoushan port (China)," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 21-35.
    3. Anqiang Huang & Xinjun Liu & Changrui Rao & Yi Zhang & Yifan He, 2022. "A New Container Throughput Forecasting Paradigm under COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Francesco Parola & Giovanni Satta & Theo Notteboom & Luca Persico, 2021. "Revisiting traffic forecasting by port authorities in the context of port planning and development," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 444-494, September.
    5. Filom, Siyavash & Amiri, Amir M. & Razavi, Saiedeh, 2022. "Applications of machine learning methods in port operations – A systematic literature review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Truong Ngoc Cuong & Le Ngoc Bao Long & Hwan-Seong Kim & Sam-Sang You, 2023. "Data analytics and throughput forecasting in port management systems against disruptions: a case study of Busan Port," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 61-89, March.
    7. M. Milenković & N. Milosavljevic & N. Bojović & S. Val, 2021. "Container flow forecasting through neural networks based on metaheuristics," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 965-997, June.
    8. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    9. Yi Xiao & Minghu Xie & Yi Hu & Ming Yi, 2023. "Effective multi‐step ahead container throughput forecasting under the complex context," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1823-1843, November.
    10. Kumawat, Govind Lal & Roy, Debjit & De Koster, René & Adan, Ivo, 2021. "Stochastic modeling of parallel process flows in intra-logistics systems: Applications in container terminals and compact storage systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 159-176.
    11. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    12. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    13. Tiller, Kara Carroll & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2017. "Spatial patterns of landside trade impedance in containerized South American exports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 272-285.
    14. Jones, Dean A. & Farkas, Julie L. & Bernstein, Orr & Davis, Chad E. & Turk, Adam & Turnquist, Mark A. & Nozick, Linda K. & Levine, Brian & Rawls, Carmen G. & Ostrowski, Scott D. & Sawaya, William, 2011. "U.S. import/export container flow modeling and disruption analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 3-14.
    15. Truong Ngoc Cuong & Sam-Sang You & Le Ngoc Bao Long & Hwan-Seong Kim, 2022. "Seaport Resilience Analysis and Throughput Forecast Using a Deep Learning Approach: A Case Study of Busan Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Marco Ferretti & Ugo Fiore & Francesca Perla & Marcello Risitano & Salvatore Scognamiglio, 2022. "Deep Learning Forecasting for Supporting Terminal Operators in Port Business Development," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Erhan Karakaya & Alice E. Smith & Rosa G. González Ramírez & Jimena Pascual, 2023. "Design of empty container depot layouts using data and analytics," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 196-240, March.
    18. Guerrero, David, 2014. "Deep-sea hinterlands: Some empirical evidence of the spatial impact of containerization," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 84-94.
    19. Christoph Martius & Lutz Kretschmann & Miriam Zacharias & Carlos Jahn & Ole John, 2022. "Forecasting worldwide empty container availability with machine learning techniques," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Kashiha, Mona & Thill, Jean-Claude & Depken, Craig A., 2016. "Shipping route choice across geographies: Coastal vs. landlocked countries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:132:y:2023:i:c:p:163-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.