IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v199y2025ics1366554525002108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information service and quality strategies in a supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Fei
  • Yang, Hui
  • Chen, Jing
  • Chen, Bintong
  • Yu, Bo

Abstract

E-commerce platforms (EPs) commonly provide information services. This study explores an EP’s information service strategy and an original equipment manufacturer’s (OEM) quality strategy in a supply chain. The OEM outsources production to a competing contract manufacturer (CM), and both the OEM and the CM sell their products through the platform, paying a preset commission. The EP decides whether to provide information on consumer quality preferences to the two manufacturers, incurring an associated cost. The OEM needs to determine its product quality strategy by strategically setting the optimal quality level relative to the CM’s product. By developing a game-theoretical model, we derive the optimal information service strategy for the EP and the quality strategy for the OEM. Our findings show that the platform prefers to provide the information services when the CM’s product has a low cost-quality ratio or when obtaining the information is inexpensive. In addition, the OEM opts for lower product quality relative to the CM’s product when the cost-quality ratio is high. We identify two effects of the EP’s information service: increasing product quality investment (quality-discrimination effect) and intensifying competition (competition-intensification effect) driven by price adjustments. These effects significantly impact the OEM’s quality strategy when consumers have low-quality preferences, leading to reduced quality and selling price when the cost-quality ratio of the CM’s product is low. Interestingly, these effects may conflict, inducing the OEM to increase both quality and selling price when this ratio is relatively high. Our study provides valuable managerial insights, suggesting that EPs should provide the information service when the CM’s product has a low cost-quality ratio or when obtaining consumer quality preferences is inexpensive. OEMs should strategically adjust their product quality relative to the CM’s product, especially when targeting consumers with low quality preferences. Extensions confirms the robustness of the major results derived from our main model.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Fei & Yang, Hui & Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong & Yu, Bo, 2025. "Information service and quality strategies in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guan, Xu & Mantrala, Murali & Bian, Yiwen, 2019. "Strategic information management in a distribution channel," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 42-56.
    2. Liang Guo, 2021. "Partial Unraveling and Strategic Contract Timing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7719-7736, December.
    3. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2021. "Incentive of retailer information sharing on manufacturer volume flexibility choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Jing Wang & Yingchen Yan & Huibin Du & Ruiqing Zhao, 2020. "The optimal sales format for green products considering downstream investment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1107-1126, February.
    5. Albert Ha & Xiaoyang Long & Javad Nasiry, 2016. "Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 280-298, May.
    6. Lin Tian & Asoo J. Vakharia & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Yifan Xu, 2018. "Marketplace, Reseller, or Hybrid: Strategic Analysis of an Emerging E‐Commerce Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1595-1610, August.
    7. Bruce McWilliams, 2012. "Money-Back Guarantees: Helping the Low-Quality Retailer," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(8), pages 1521-1524, August.
    8. Dong, Binwei & Tang, Wansheng & Zhou, Chi & Ren, Yufei, 2021. "Should original equipment manufacturer assist noncompetitive contract manufacturer to expand capacity?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Chen, Jing & Zhang, Hui & Sun, Ying, 2012. "Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 571-583.
    10. Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Tang, Christopher S., 2013. "Strategies and tactics of Chinese contract manufacturers and western OEMs (2001–2011)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 14-24.
    11. Padilla, Jorge & Piccolo, Salvatore & Vasconcelos, Helder, 2021. "Should vertically integrated platforms be mandated to share information with their rivals?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    12. Xiao, Lei & Xu, Minghui & Zheng, Jun-Jun & Huang, Song, 2020. "Inducing manufacturer’s quality enhancement via retailer’s acquisition strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Xianjun Geng & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Lai Wei, 2018. "How Add†on Pricing Interacts with Distribution Contracts," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(4), pages 605-623, April.
    14. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "The developer’s sourcing strategy in the presence of a competing manufacturer and consumers’ two-dimensional differentiated preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    15. Hongyan Shi & Yunchuan Liu & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2013. "Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1162-1176, May.
    16. Avner Shaked & John Sutton, 1982. "Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 49(1), pages 3-13.
    17. Wang, Sujuan & Hu, Qiying & Liu, Weiqi, 2017. "Price and quality-based competition and channel structure with consumer loyalty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 563-574.
    18. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    19. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    20. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kinshuk Jerath & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2259-2280, August.
    21. Huamin Wu & Hong Zheng & Jinchao Li, 2023. "The interplay between quality improvement and information acquisition in an E-commerce supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 847-870, October.
    22. Rajiv D. Banker & Inder Khosla & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 1998. "Quality and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(9), pages 1179-1192, September.
    23. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2018. "Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 97-108.
    24. Xue Li & Xiaoqiang Cai & Jian Chen, 2022. "Quality and Private Label Encroachment Strategy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 374-390, January.
    25. Cai, Gangshu (George) & Zhang, Zhe George & Zhang, Michael, 2009. "Game theoretical perspectives on dual-channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 80-96, January.
    26. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    27. Cui, Qinquan, 2019. "Quality investment, and the contract manufacturer’s encroachment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 407-418.
    28. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 141-168.
    29. Lin Hao & Yong Tan, 2019. "Who Wants Consumers to Be Informed? Facilitating Information Disclosure in a Distribution Channel," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 34-49, March.
    30. Yushi Tsunoda & Yusuke Zennyo, 2021. "Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4219-4235, November.
    31. Yang, Hui & Chen, Jing & Chen, Xu & Chen, Bintong, 2017. "The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 139-150.
    32. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    33. Liu, Molin & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Shuguang & Ma, Songxuan, 2021. "Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 572-584.
    34. Cui Zhao & Xiaojun Wang & Yongbo Xiao & Jie Sheng, 2022. "Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3840-3858, October.
    35. Wang, Lisha & Chen, Jing & Song, Huaming, 2021. "Marketplace or reseller? Platform strategy in the presence of customer returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    36. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-qing, 2019. "Factory encroachment and channel selection in an outsourced supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 73-83.
    37. Peng Liu & Rong Zhang & Bin Liu, 2023. "Information sharing under agency selling in an e-commerce supply chain with competing OEMs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-27, September.
    38. Chester Chambers & Panos Kouvelis & John Semple, 2006. "Quality-Based Competition, Profitability, and Variable Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1884-1895, December.
    39. Dongwook Shin & Assaf Zeevi, 2024. "Product Quality and Information Sharing in the Presence of Reviews," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1428-1447, March.
    40. Guo Li & Lin Tian & Hong Zheng, 2021. "Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3713-3734, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Fei & Chen, Jing & Yang, Hui & Chen, Bintong & Wan, Zeying, 2023. "Production outsourcing decision in the presence of consumer’s preference uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Dong, Shuang & Qin, Zhongfeng & Yan, Yingchen, 2022. "Effects of online-to-offline spillovers on pricing and quality strategies of competing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    3. Luo, Huajiang & Zhong, Ling & Nie, Jiajia, 2022. "Quality and distribution channel selection on a hybrid platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    5. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    6. Chen, Jingxian & Liang, Liang & Yao, Dong-Qing & Sun, Shengnan, 2017. "Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 935-948.
    7. Tan, Yinliang (Ricky) & Yu, Chuanbin & Liu, Yang & Zheng, Quan, 2024. "Agency models in online platforms: A review of recent developments and future prospects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 679-695.
    8. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Huaming & Shi, Victor & Yang, Shilei, 2021. "Quality differentiation in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1000-1013.
    9. Tong, Yang & Li, Lixu & Yang, Danqin & Jiang, Xia, 2023. "Impacts of online intermediary’s platform openness under asymmetric quality information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Zhu, Haoruo & Ni, Yaodong & Xiao, Yongbo, 2025. "Information sharing across competing platforms with varying information capabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 125-138.
    11. Wang, Lisha & Chen, Jing & Song, Huaming, 2021. "Marketplace or reseller? Platform strategy in the presence of customer returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Huamin Wu & Hong Zheng & Jinchao Li, 2023. "The interplay between quality improvement and information acquisition in an E-commerce supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 847-870, October.
    13. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong, 2024. "Impact of a contract manufacturer's entry on two competing platforms' sourcing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    15. Zhang, Qi & Chen, Jingxian & Zhao, Ju & Yao, Dong-Qing, 2025. "Quality certification decision of online retail platform under heterogeneous manufacturers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    16. Zhang, Xinxin & Zhang, Xiuyi & Huang, Junran, 2025. "Socially responsible e-commerce supply chains: Sales mode preference and store brand introduction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Hu, Shu & Fu, Ke, 2025. "Equilibrium analysis of the seller’s fulfillment channels and sales channels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 544-558.
    18. Le Wang & Zhen He & Shuguang He, 2023. "Quality differentiation and e‐tailer's choice between reselling and agency selling," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3518-3536, September.
    19. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    20. Chen, Zhongwei & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Offering return-freight insurance or not: Strategic analysis of an e-seller's decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:199:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525002108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.