IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v196y2025ics1366554525000584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generic model for capacity allocation on transportation terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Berktas, Nihal
  • Zografos, Konstantinos G.

Abstract

Transportation terminals play an important role in the functioning of the transportation system. Therefore, the efficient use of the capacity of transportation terminals is considered a major determinant of the performance of transportation networks. An important decision related to the efficient functioning of congested terminals relates to the optimum allocation of the available capacity to different operators (users). The capacity allocation problem in transportation terminals, such as airports, railroad stations, ports, involves the optimum apportion of the available capacity to different users, such as airlines, rail, and shipping companies, while satisfying operational, and regulatory constraints and requirements. Motivated by the similarities across capacity allocation problems in terminals of different transportation modes and the lack of a unifying framework, this study introduces a generic mixed integer linear programming (MILP) formulation and demonstrates its applicability through a detailed application of the proposed model for rail networks. The generic mathematical model is a generalization of models highly utilized in airport slot allocation. We explicitly present how the model applies to the train timetabling problem and conduct computational experiments using publicly available data. Our computational experiments show that the model consistently achieves optimal solutions across almost all tested cases, including instances where published solutions are suboptimal. The analysis of the results for a specific instance indicates that incorporating station capacity constraints yields the same set of scheduled requests but alters the deviations from the desired arrival and departure times. In contrast, increase in the flexibility of the requested times significantly affect the solution, leading to increase in the number of scheduled trains, deviations, and the overall length of the journey.

Suggested Citation

  • Berktas, Nihal & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2025. "Generic model for capacity allocation on transportation terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525000584
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525000584
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernardo Martin-Iradi & Dario Pacino & Stefan Ropke, 2022. "The Multiport Berth Allocation Problem with Speed Optimization: Exact Methods and a Cooperative Game Analysis," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 972-999, July.
    2. Luis Cadarso & Ángel Marín, 2012. "Integration of timetable planning and rolling stock in rapid transit networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 113-135, October.
    3. Pan, Hanchuan & Yang, Lixing & Liang, Zhe, 2023. "Demand-oriented integration optimization of train timetabling and rolling stock circulation planning with flexible train compositions: A column-generation-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 184-206.
    4. Pan, Hanchuan & Yang, Lixing & Liang, Zhe & Yang, Hai, 2024. "New Exact Algorithm for the integrated train timetabling and rolling stock circulation planning problem with stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 906-929.
    5. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2021. "Train timetabling with stop-skipping, passenger flow, and platform choice considerations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 52-74.
    6. Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2012. "Nominal and robust train timetabling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 727-737.
    7. Cacchiani, Valentina & Furini, Fabio & Kidd, Martin Philip, 2016. "Approaches to a real-world Train Timetabling Problem in a railway node," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 97-110.
    8. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 401-417, May.
    9. Keskin, Merve & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2023. "Optimal network-wide adjustments of initial airport slot allocations with connectivity and fairness objectives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Alberto Caprara & Matteo Fischetti & Paolo Toth, 2002. "Modeling and Solving the Train Timetabling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 851-861, October.
    11. Giallombardo, Giovanni & Moccia, Luigi & Salani, Matteo & Vacca, Ilaria, 2010. "Modeling and solving the Tactical Berth Allocation Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 232-245, February.
    12. Katsigiannis, Fotios A. & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2021. "Optimising airport slot allocation considering flight-scheduling flexibility and total airport capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 50-87.
    13. Robenek, Tomáš & Maknoon, Yousef & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Chen, Jianghang & Bierlaire, Michel, 2016. "Passenger centric train timetabling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 107-126.
    14. Pellegrini, Paola & Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Pesenti, Raffaele, 2017. "SOSTA: An effective model for the Simultaneous Optimisation of airport SloT Allocation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 34-53.
    15. Fernández, Elena & Munoz-Marquez, Manuel, 2022. "New formulations and solutions for the strategic berth template problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 99-117.
    16. Cacchiani, Valentina & Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing, 2020. "Robust optimization models for integrated train stop planning and timetabling with passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-29.
    17. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte & Pasquale Legato & Luigi Moccia, 2005. "Models and Tabu Search Heuristics for the Berth-Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 526-538, November.
    18. Ribeiro, Nuno Antunes & Jacquillat, Alexandre & Antunes, António Pais & Odoni, Amedeo, 2019. "Improving slot allocation at Level 3 airports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 32-54.
    19. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    20. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    21. Cacchiani, Valentina & Caprara, Alberto & Toth, Paolo, 2010. "Scheduling extra freight trains on railway networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 215-231, February.
    22. Fairbrother, Jamie & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2021. "Optimal scheduling of slots with season segmentation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 961-982.
    23. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    24. Valentina Cacchiani & Alberto Caprara & Matteo Fischetti, 2012. "A Lagrangian Heuristic for Robustness, with an Application to Train Timetabling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 124-133, February.
    25. Imai, Akio & Yamakawa, Yukiko & Huang, Kuancheng, 2014. "The strategic berth template problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-100.
    26. Yan, Fei & Bešinović, Nikola & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Multi-objective periodic railway timetabling on dense heterogeneous railway corridors," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 52-75.
    27. Jamie Fairbrother & Konstantinos G. Zografos & Kevin D. Glazebrook, 2020. "A Slot-Scheduling Mechanism at Congested Airports that Incorporates Efficiency, Fairness, and Airline Preferences," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 115-138, January.
    28. Zhen, Lu, 2015. "Tactical berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 928-944.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoqi Xie & Daniela Ambrosino, 2025. "Operations Research, Machine Learning, and Integrated Techniques for Decision Problems in the Seaside Area of Container Terminals," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-51, June.
    2. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    3. Wawrzyniak, Jakub & Drozdowski, Maciej & Sanlaville, Éric, 2020. "Selecting algorithms for large berth allocation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 844-862.
    4. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    5. Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang & Kai Wang, 2016. "Terminal allocation problem in a transshipment hub considering bunker consumption," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(7), pages 529-548, October.
    6. Xavier Schepler & Nabil Absi & Dominique Feillet & Eric Sanlaville, 2019. "The stochastic discrete berth allocation problem," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(4), pages 363-396, December.
    7. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    8. Kai Wang & Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang, 2018. "Column Generation for the Integrated Berth Allocation, Quay Crane Assignment, and Yard Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 812-834, August.
    9. Jiang, Feng & Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2017. "Train timetabling by skip-stop planning in highly congested lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 149-174.
    10. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An expanded robust optimisation approach for the berth allocation problem considering uncertain operation time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Eduardo Lalla-Ruiz & Stefan Voß & Christopher Expósito-Izquierdo & Belén Melián-Batista & J. Marcos Moreno-Vega, 2017. "A POPMUSIC-based approach for the berth allocation problem under time-dependent limitations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(2), pages 871-897, June.
    12. Keskin, Merve & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2023. "Optimal network-wide adjustments of initial airport slot allocations with connectivity and fairness objectives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Kramer, Arthur & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Iori, Manuel & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "Novel formulations and modeling enhancements for the dynamic berth allocation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 170-185.
    14. Zhen, Lu & Liang, Zhe & Zhuge, Dan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2017. "Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 193-217.
    15. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2020. "A two-stage robust optimization approach for the berth allocation problem under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 425-452, June.
    16. Liu, Baoli & Li, Zhi-Chun & Sheng, Dian & Wang, Yadong, 2021. "Integrated planning of berth allocation and vessel sequencing in a seaport with one-way navigation channel," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 23-47.
    17. Jin, Jian Gang & Lee, Der-Horng & Hu, Hao, 2015. "Tactical berth and yard template design at container transshipment terminals: A column generation based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 168-184.
    18. Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan & Yao, Yu & Zhang, Xin & Zhou, Xuesong, 2019. "Solving cyclic train timetabling problem through model reformulation: Extended time-space network construct and Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 344-379.
    19. Zhen, Lu & Shen, Tao & Wang, Shuaian & Yu, Shucheng, 2016. "Models on ship scheduling in transshipment hubs with considering bunker cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 111-121.
    20. Fernández, Elena & Munoz-Marquez, Manuel, 2022. "New formulations and solutions for the strategic berth template problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 99-117.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525000584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.