IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v184y2024ics1366554524000772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agency, reselling, or hybrid mode? Competing with store brand

Author

Listed:
  • Ke, Wan
  • Zhou, Xiaoyang
  • Lev, Benjamin
  • Zhang, Kai

Abstract

Platform supply chains are emerging as a new form of global supply chain that encompass reselling, agency selling, and hybrid selling modes. This paper examines the impact of store brand products on the firms’ sales strategies. We consider the selection between three sales modes available to suppliers, both with and without the store brand products: reselling, agency selling, and hybrid selling. Comparing the firms’ optimal strategies shows that the hybrid mode consistently yields greater profits when compared to the agency selling mode. Notably, our findings reveal that firms’ optimal choice of sales mode varies depending on the commission rate. The optimal sales mode differs when the commission rate is lower or higher. In the presence of the store brand products, firms choose the reselling mode only when the commission rate is high and consumers’ perceived value of national brand products is low. Otherwise, equilibrium outcomes are not achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke, Wan & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Lev, Benjamin & Zhang, Kai, 2024. "Agency, reselling, or hybrid mode? Competing with store brand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000772
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524000772
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.