IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v45y2011i8p1266-1283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for customer service level protection under multi-echelon supply chain disruption risk

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitt, Amanda J.

Abstract

We model a multi-echelon system where disruptions can occur at any stage and evaluate multiple strategies for protecting customer service if a disruption should occur. The strategies considered take advantage of the network itself and include satisfying demand from an alternate location in the network, procuring material or transportation from an alternate source or route, and holding strategic inventory reserves throughout the network. Unmet demand is modeled using a mix of backordering and lost sales. We conduct numerical analysis and provide recommendations on selecting strategic mitigation methods to diminish the impact of disruptions on customer service. We demonstrate that the greatest service level improvements can be made by providing both proactive inventory placement to cover short disruptions or the start of long disruptions, and reactive back-up methods to help the supply chain recover after long or permanent disruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitt, Amanda J., 2011. "Strategies for customer service level protection under multi-echelon supply chain disruption risk," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1266-1283, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:45:y:2011:i:8:p:1266-1283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261511000221
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    2. Schmitt, Amanda J. & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2010. "Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 313-328, October.
    3. Ramesh Bollapragada & Uday S. Rao & Jun Zhang, 2004. "Managing Inventory and Supply Performance in Assembly Systems with Random Supply Capacity and Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12), pages 1729-1743, December.
    4. Chu, Peter & Yang, Kuo-Lung & Liang, Shing-Ko & Niu, Thomas, 2004. "Note on inventory model with a mixture of back orders and lost sales," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 470-475, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    2. Asghari, M. & Afshari, H. & Jaber, M.Y. & Searcy, C., 2023. "Credibility-based cascading approach to achieve net-zero emissions in energy symbiosis networks using an Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    3. Lu, Mengshi & Huang, Simin & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2011. "Product substitution and dual sourcing under random supply failures," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1251-1265, September.
    4. Chen, Kebing & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2015. "Outsourcing strategy and production disruption of supply chain with demand and capacity allocation uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 243-257.
    5. René Y. Glogg & Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2022. "Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 395-423, July.
    6. Schmitt, Amanda J. & Sun, Siyuan Anthony & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2015. "Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 201-212.
    7. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Ruhul Sarker & Daryl Essam, 2018. "A reactive mitigation approach for managing supply disruption in a three-tier supply chain," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1581-1597, October.
    8. Mohammaddust, Faeghe & Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Mofidfar, Mohammad & Hill, Alex, 2017. "Developing lean and responsive supply chains: A robust model for alternative risk mitigation strategies in supply chain designs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 632-653.
    9. Shao, Xiao-Feng, 2012. "Demand-side reactive strategies for supply disruptions in a multiple-product system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 241-252.
    10. Hong, Yoo Suk & Huh, Woonghee Tim & Kang, Changmuk, 2017. "Sourcing assemble-to-order inventories under supplier risk uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 1-14.
    11. Sevgen, Arya & Sargut, F. Zeynep, 2019. "May reorder point help under disruptions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 61-69.
    12. Ray, Pritee & Jenamani, Mamata, 2016. "Mean-variance analysis of sourcing decision under disruption risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 679-689.
    13. Ying Wu & Haiyan Li & Qinglong Gou & Jibao Gu, 2017. "Supply chain models with corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6732-6759, November.
    14. Rongfang Yan & Dejun Kou & Bin Lu, 2019. "Optimal Order Policies for Dual-Sourcing Supply Chains under Random Supply Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Masih-Tehrani, Behdad & Xu, Susan H. & Kumara, Soundar & Li, Haijun, 2011. "A single-period analysis of a two-echelon inventory system with dependent supply uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1128-1151, September.
    16. Lingxiu Dong & Brian Tomlin, 2012. "Managing Disruption Risk: The Interplay Between Operations and Insurance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(10), pages 1898-1915, October.
    17. Cheong, Taesu & Song, Sang Hwa, 2013. "The value of information on supply risk under random yields," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-38.
    18. A. Thangam, 2017. "Retailer’s optimal replenishment policy in a two-echelon supply chain under two-part delay in payments and disruption in delivery," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 26-46, January.
    19. Gregory A. DeCroix, 2013. "Inventory Management for an Assembly System Subject to Supply Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(9), pages 2079-2092, September.
    20. Xu, He & Zuo, Xiaolu & Liu, Zhixue, 2015. "Configuration of flexibility strategies under supply uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 71-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:45:y:2011:i:8:p:1266-1283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.