IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v43y2009i1p73-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information-based network control strategies consistent with estimated driver behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Paz, Alexander
  • Peeta, Srinivas

Abstract

This study proposes a fuzzy control based methodology to determine information-based network control strategies that are consistent with the controller's objectives and its estimation of driver response behavior. It is the core of the broader problem where the objective is to enhance the performance of a vehicular traffic system through real-time information-based network control strategies. The controller seeks behavior consistency by solving a fixed-point problem that estimates drivers' likely reactions to the controller-proposed information strategies while determining them. Experiments are performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The results suggest the importance of using a behavior-consistent approach to determine the information-based network control strategies. That is, the effects of driver response behavior to information provision may require more meaningful strategies than those provided under the traditional dynamic traffic assignment models to reliably estimate or control system performance. Information strategies that are not behavior-consistent can potentially deteriorate system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Paz, Alexander & Peeta, Srinivas, 2009. "Information-based network control strategies consistent with estimated driver behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 73-96, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:43:y:2009:i:1:p:73-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(08)00078-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shlomo Bekhor & Moshe Ben-Akiva & M. Ramming, 2006. "Evaluation of choice set generation algorithms for route choice models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 235-247, April.
    2. Yannis Pavlis & Markos Papageorgiou, 1999. "Simple Decentralized Feedback Strategies for Route Guidance in Traffic Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 264-278, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lianzhen Wang & Han Zhang & Lingyun Shi & Qingling He & Huizhi Xu, 2021. "Optimization Model of Regional Traffic Signs for Inducement at Road Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Wu, Hsi-Jen, 2015. "Driver perception uncertainty in perceived relative speed and reaction time in car following – A quantum optical flow perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 257-274.
    3. Yu-Ting Hsu & Srinivas Peeta, 2013. "An aggregate approach to model evacuee behavior for no-notice evacuation operations," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 671-696, May.
    4. Assemi, Behrang & Baker, Douglas & Paz, Alexander, 2020. "Searching for on-street parking: An empirical investigation of the factors influencing cruise time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 186-196.
    5. Paz, Alexander & Peeta, Srinivas, 2009. "On-line calibration of behavior parameters for behavior-consistent route guidance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 403-421, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2021. "Shortest paths, travel costs, and traffic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 828-844, May.
    2. Pi, Xidong & Qian, Zhen (Sean), 2017. "A stochastic optimal control approach for real-time traffic routing considering demand uncertainties and travelers’ choice heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 710-732.
    3. Katrien Ramaekers & Sofie Reumers & Geert Wets & Mario Cools, 2013. "Modelling Route Choice Decisions of Car Travellers Using Combined GPS and Diary Data," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 351-372, September.
    4. Yao, Rui & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2022. "A variational autoencoder approach for choice set generation and implicit perception of alternatives in choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 273-294.
    5. Daniel Hess, 2012. "Walking to the bus: perceived versus actual walking distance to bus stops for older adults," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 247-266, March.
    6. Dinopoulou, Vaya & Diakaki, Christina & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2006. "Applications of the urban traffic control strategy TUC," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1652-1665, December.
    7. Shanjiang Zhu & David Levinson, 2011. "A Portfolio Theory of Route Choice," Working Papers 000096, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    8. Evanthia Kazagli & Michel Bierlaire & Matthieu de Lapparent, 2020. "Operational route choice methodologies for practical applications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 43-74, February.
    9. Songyot Kitthamkesorn & Anthony Chen, 2024. "Stochastic User Equilibrium Model with a Bounded Perceived Travel Time," Papers 2402.18435, arXiv.org.
    10. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Bierlaire, Michel, 2013. "Metropolis–Hastings sampling of paths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 53-66.
    11. Liu, Haoxiang & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng, 2019. "Bike network design problem with a path-size logit-based equilibrium constraint: Formulation, global optimization, and matheuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 284-307.
    12. Kazagli, Evanthia & Bierlaire, Michel & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2016. "Revisiting the route choice problem: A modeling framework based on mental representations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-23.
    13. Xuan Di & Henry X. Liu & Shanjiang Zhu & David M. Levinson, 2017. "Indifference bands for boundedly rational route switching," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1169-1194, September.
    14. C. Jacobs-Crisioni & C. C. Koopmans, 2016. "Transport link scanner: simulating geographic transport network expansion through individual investments," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 265-301, July.
    15. Guo, Zhan & Loo, Becky P.Y., 2013. "Pedestrian environment and route choice: evidence from New York City and Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 124-136.
    16. Wenyun Tang & David Levinson, 2014. "An empirical study of the deviation between actual and shortest travel time paths," Working Papers 000125, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    17. Felipe González & Carlos Melo-Riquelme & Louis Grange, 2016. "A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 407-423, May.
    18. Thomas, Tom & Tutert, Bas, 2015. "Route choice behavior in a radial structured urban network: Do people choose the orbital or the route through the city center?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 85-95.
    19. Jaap Vreeswijk & Tom Thomas & Eric Berkum & Bart Arem, 2014. "Perception bias in route choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1305-1321, November.
    20. Scott, Darren M. & Lu, Wei & Brown, Matthew J., 2021. "Route choice of bike share users: Leveraging GPS data to derive choice sets," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:43:y:2009:i:1:p:73-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.