Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior
We propose another version of the multinomial probit model with a structured covariance matrix to represent any overlapped relation between route alternatives. The fundamental ideas of the model were presented in Yai et al. (1993) and Yai and Iwakura (1994). The assumptions introduced in the model may be more realistic for route choice behaviors on a dense network than the strict assumption of the independent alternative property of the multinomial logit model. As the nested logit model assumes an identical dispersion parameter between two modeling levels for all trip makers, the model has difficulty in expressing individual choice-tree structures. To improve the applicability of the multinomial probit model to route choice behaviors, we introduce a function which represents an overlapped relation between pairs of alternatives and propose a multinomial probit model in which the structured covariance matrix uses the function in order to consider the individual choice-tree structures in the matrix and the estimatability of the new alternative's covariances. After examining the applicability of the multinomial probit model using empirical route choice data in a Tokyo metropolitan region, we also propose a method for evaluating consumer benefits on complicated networks based on the multinomial probit model.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 31 (1997)
Issue (Month): 3 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- John F. Geweke & Michael P. Keane & David E. Runkle, 1994.
"Alternative computational approaches to inference in the multinomial probit model,"
170, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
- Geweke, John & Keane, Michael P & Runkle, David, 1994. "Alternative Computational Approaches to Inference in the Multinomial Probit Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(4), pages 609-32, November.
- Daniel McFadden, 1987.
"A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration,"
464, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- McFadden, Daniel, 1989. "A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models without Numerical Integration," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(5), pages 995-1026, September.
- J. A. Hausman & D. A. Wise, 1976.
"A Conditional Profit Model for Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogeneous Preferences,"
173, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- Hausman, Jerry A & Wise, David A, 1978. "A Conditional Probit Model for Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogeneous Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(2), pages 403-26, March.
- Bolduc, Denis, 1992. "Generalized autoregressive errors in the multinomial probit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 155-170, April.
- C F Daganzo & Y Sheffi, 1982. "Multinomial probit with time-series data: unifying state dependence and serial correlation models," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 14(10), pages 1377-1388, October.
- Bunch, David S., 1991. "Estimability in the Multinomial Probit Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gf1t128, University of California Transportation Center.
- Pakes, Ariel & Pollard, David, 1989. "Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(5), pages 1027-57, September.
- H C W L Williams, 1977. "On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit," Environment and Planning A, SAGE Publishing, vol. 9(3), pages 285-344, March.
- C F Daganzo & Y Sheffi, 1982. "Multinomial Probit with Time-Series Data: Unifying State Dependence and Serial Correlation Models," Environment and Planning A, SAGE Publishing, vol. 14(10), pages 1377-1388, October.
- Horowitz, Joel L., 1991. "Reconsidering the multinomial probit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 433-438, December.
- Bunch, David S., 1991. "Estimability in the multinomial probit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-12, February.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:31:y:1997:i:3:p:195-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.