IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v16y1982i3p382-401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of the Accuracy of the Clark Approximation for the Multinomial Probit Model

Author

Listed:
  • Joel L. Horowitz

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.)

  • Jürg M. Sparmann

    (University of California, Berkeley, California)

  • Carlos F. Daganzo

    (University of California, Berkeley, California)

Abstract

The Clark approximation, in which the maximum of two normally distributed random variables is approximated by a third normally distributed random variable, forms the basis of a relatively inexpensive technique for evaluating the choice probabilities of multinomial probit models. This paper reports the results of a series of numerical experiments in which the accuracy of probit computations based on the Clark approximation was investigated. In contrast to previous investigations, these experiments dealt with the accuracy of the results obtained when the Clark approximation is used for econometric estimation of the values of probit models' parameters and for prediction of choice probabilities using the estimated parameter values. It was found that the accuracy of the results obtained with the Clark approximation varies greatly from model to model. In many of the experiments the approximation performed quite satisfactorily, but in others it produced errors that probably would be causes for concern in practical work. It is difficult or impossible to judge the accuracy of results obtained using the Clark approximation without knowledge of the results that would be obtained using a computational technique that is known to be accurate. Consequently, in practical empirical work it often will not be possible to obtain reliable indicators of the Clark approximation's accuracy. However, it is likely that the errors resulting from use of the Clark approximation to estimate a probit model are small compared to the errors that would result from using the simpler logit model in a situation where the correct model specification is probit

Suggested Citation

  • Joel L. Horowitz & Jürg M. Sparmann & Carlos F. Daganzo, 1982. "An Investigation of the Accuracy of the Clark Approximation for the Multinomial Probit Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 382-401, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:16:y:1982:i:3:p:382-401
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.16.3.382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.16.3.382
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.16.3.382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tasos Nikoleris & Mark Hansen, 2012. "Queueing Models for Trajectory-Based Aircraft Operations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 501-511, November.
    2. Paul Gertler & Roland Sturm & Bruce Davidson, 1994. "Information and the Demand for Supplemental Medicare Insurance," NBER Working Papers 4700, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Bolduc, Denis & Kaci, Mustapha, 1993. "Estimation des modèles probit polytomiques : un survol des techniques," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 69(3), pages 161-191, septembre.
    4. Wada, Kentaro & Usui, Kento & Takigawa, Tsubasa & Kuwahara, Masao, 2018. "An optimization modeling of coordinated traffic signal control based on the variational theory and its stochastic extension," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 907-925.
    5. Deng, Wen & Lei, Hao & Zhou, Xuesong, 2013. "Traffic state estimation and uncertainty quantification based on heterogeneous data sources: A three detector approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 132-157.
    6. Vijverberg, Wim P. M., 1997. "Monte Carlo evaluation of multivariate normal probabilities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 281-307.
    7. Batram, Manuel & Bauer, Dietmar, 2019. "On consistency of the MACML approach to discrete choice modelling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Sean F. Reardon & Benjamin R. Shear & Katherine E. Castellano & Andrew D. Ho, 2017. "Using Heteroskedastic Ordered Probit Models to Recover Moments of Continuous Test Score Distributions From Coarsened Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-45, February.
    9. Yai, Tetsuo & Iwakura, Seiji & Morichi, Shigeru, 1997. "Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 195-207, June.
    10. Maher, M. J. & Hughes, P. C., 1997. "A probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 341-355, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:16:y:1982:i:3:p:382-401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.