IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v105y2017icp401-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sufficient optimality conditions for distributed, non-predictive ramp metering in the monotonic cell transmission model

Author

Listed:
  • Schmitt, Marius
  • Ramesh, Chithrupa
  • Lygeros, John

Abstract

We consider the ramp metering problem for a freeway stretch modeled by the Cell Transmission Model. Assuming perfect model knowledge and perfect traffic demand prediction, the ramp metering problem can be cast as a finite horizon optimal control problem with the objective of minimizing the Total Time Spent, i.e., the sum of the travel times of all drivers. For this reason, the application of Model Predictive Control (MPC) to the ramp metering problem has been proposed. However, practical tests on freeways show that MPC may not outperform simple, distributed feedback policies. Until now, a theoretical justification for this empirical observation was lacking. This work compares the performance of distributed, non-predictive policies to the optimal solution in an idealised setting, specifically, for monotonic traffic dynamics and assuming perfect model knowledge. To do so, we suggest a distributed, non-predictive policy and derive sufficient optimality conditions for the minimization of the Total Time Spent via monotonicity arguments. In a case study based on real-world traffic data, we demonstrate that these optimality conditions are only rarely violated. Moreover, we observe that the suboptimality resulting from such infrequent violations appears to be negligible. We complement this analysis with simulations in non-ideal settings, in particular allowing for model mismatch, and argue that Alinea, a successful, distributed ramp metering policy, comes close to the ideal controller both in terms of control behavior and in performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmitt, Marius & Ramesh, Chithrupa & Lygeros, John, 2017. "Sufficient optimality conditions for distributed, non-predictive ramp metering in the monotonic cell transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 401-422.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:401-422
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261516305951
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2017.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Lei & Levinson, David, 2004. "Optimal freeway ramp control without origin-destination information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 869-887, December.
    2. Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos, 2000. "A Linear Programming Model for the Single Destination System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 37-49, February.
    3. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    4. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    5. Smaragdis, Emmanouil & Papageorgiou, Markos & Kosmatopoulos, Elias, 2004. "A flow-maximizing adaptive local ramp metering strategy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 251-270, March.
    6. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    7. Como, Giacomo & Lovisari, Enrico & Savla, Ketan, 2016. "Convexity and robustness of dynamic traffic assignment and freeway network control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 446-465.
    8. Yuan, Kai & Knoop, Victor L. & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2017. "A kinematic wave model in Lagrangian coordinates incorporating capacity drop: Application to homogeneous road stretches and discontinuities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 472-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmitt, Marius & Lygeros, John, 2018. "An exact convex relaxation of the freeway network control problem with controlled merging junctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-25.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reilly, Jack & Martin, Sébastien & Payer, Mathias & Bayen, Alexandre M., 2016. "Creating complex congestion patterns via multi-objective optimal freeway traffic control with application to cyber-security," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 366-382.
    2. Schmitt, Marius & Lygeros, John, 2018. "An exact convex relaxation of the freeway network control problem with controlled merging junctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-25.
    3. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    5. Mohebifard, Rasool & Hajbabaie, Ali, 2019. "Optimal network-level traffic signal control: A benders decomposition-based solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 252-274.
    6. Ngoduy, D. & Hoang, N.H. & Vu, H.L. & Watling, D., 2016. "Optimal queue placement in dynamic system optimum solutions for single origin-destination traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 148-169.
    7. Chi Xie & Jennifer Duthie, 2015. "An Excess-Demand Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approach for Inferring Origin-Destination Trip Matrices," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 947-979, December.
    8. Islam, Tarikul & Vu, Hai L. & Hoang, Nam H. & Cricenti, Antonio, 2018. "A linear bus rapid transit with transit signal priority formulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 163-184.
    9. He, Sheng-Xue, 2016. "Will a higher free-flow speed lead us to a less congested freeway?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 17-38.
    10. Samitha Samaranayake & Walid Krichene & Jack Reilly & Maria Laura Delle Monache & Paola Goatin & Alexandre Bayen, 2018. "Discrete-Time System Optimal Dynamic Traffic Assignment (SO-DTA) with Partial Control for Physical Queuing Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 982-1001, August.
    11. Schmitt, Marius & Lygeros, John, 2020. "On convexity of the robust freeway network control problem in the presence of prediction and model uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 167-190.
    12. Kontorinaki, Maria & Spiliopoulou, Anastasia & Roncoli, Claudio & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2017. "First-order traffic flow models incorporating capacity drop: Overview and real-data validation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 52-75.
    13. Kimms, A. & Maiwald, M., 2018. "Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1122-1136.
    14. Michael W. Levin, 2019. "A Combinatorial Dynamic Network Trajectory Reservation Algorithm for Connected Autonomous Vehicles," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 27-55, March.
    15. Kachani, Soulaymane & Perakis, Georgia, 2006. "Fluid dynamics models and their applications in transportation and pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 496-517, April.
    16. Xuedong Yan & Xiaobing Liu & Yulei Song, 2018. "Optimizing evacuation efficiency under emergency with consideration of social fairness based on a cell transmission model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    17. Douglas Bish & Edward Chamberlayne & Hesham Rakha, 2013. "Optimizing Network Flows with Congestion-Based Flow Reductions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 283-306, September.
    18. Wang, Peirong (Slade) & Li, Pengfei (Taylor) & Chowdhury, Farzana R. & Zhang, Li & Zhou, Xuesong, 2020. "A mixed integer programming formulation and scalable solution algorithms for traffic control coordination across multiple intersections based on vehicle space-time trajectories," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 266-304.
    19. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    20. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:401-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.